Right now, Trump and Clinton are about tied at best, and that's with polls rigged to favor Hillary by excluding the millenials. That means she loses. And if Trump wins, so fucking what? The DNC proved our votes can be invalidated by our own party. That means the only remedy to prevent this election fraud is leaving the party, making the #demexit not just symbolic but necessary. […]
DNC Donald Trump Report Leaked. Notes on the strategy for Installing Hillary. In addition to voter suppression and major exit poll discrepancies that two Stanford studies confirm are consistent with fraud, there is now actual material leaked evidence of election fraud and DNC collusion, rigged Primary; the Guccifer 2.0 Files. Here they are. [UPDATE] DNC, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, CA Sec of State Alex Padilla served for election fraud. […]
"The “Small Kindness” Perception: In threatening and survival situations, we look for evidence of hope — a small sign that the situation may improve. When an abuser/controller shows the victim some small kindness, even though it is to the abuser’s benefit as well, the victim interprets that small kindness as a positive trait of the captor."
The question is now how many Americans are in survival mode at the moment, struggling to get food on the table, a roof over their heads, medical care, struggling to find a job? And what is Hillary's small kindness if not a non-binding "progressive" platform? […]
Author and journalist H.A. Goodman raises a good point when he points out that if she even tried to get a job at McDonald's, and they did a background check, she would not be hired because she is at the center of a criminal FBI investigation. The GOP knows this full well, but will allow and encourage, in contained glee, for the Hillary camp to push her nomination and will do everything possible to ensure this. Afterwards, when it is too late to change horses, they will go all out on exposing this simple fact and much more, along with a major media campaign demanding an indictment. […]
Every time you hear about Hillary being the “Democratic nominee” that is actually false, according to the DNC itself. Super delegates don’t vote until July 25, and as it is now Hillary doesn’t have enough delegates. That is why there will be a contested convention.
This “transitioning phase” is part of a multi-pronged approach to the present Clinton crisis. This is being done to both mislead the public and donors, who just got leaked, as to everything being a-ok happy happy fun time, but also for the highly unlikely event the email scandal disappears, or if Sanders and his global movement drops out of the picture. […]
“The file included documentation of a 2003 preliminary report on 9/11 which identified the event as a nuclear demolition on behalf of a terrorist organization that had accessed nuclear material from US stockpiles though Israeli penetration of the Department of Energy. It further alleged that the Department of Homeland Security had been established to manage the coverup and silence whistleblowers.” […]
Hillary’s coronation was strange indeed. From the beginning, the DNC was ruthlessly suppressing all challengers, and even members of Congress who supported Sanders were warned not to, or else. Only four known Democrats in Congress, out of hundreds, are not supporting Hillary Clinton. That’s a shakedown. That is the essence of racketeering: cooperate, or else. That’s why otherwise reasonable people say Hillary’s phony lead is “insurmountable.” But for the hundreds of delegates who announced their support before Sanders even ran, willing and unwilling, and those pledged now and are in any way tied to the Hillary Victory Fund, this would be a good time to distance themselves from ground zero. […]
I knew this smug, lying, pseudo-intellectual anteater was a fraud but it's always nice to be validated. […]
The Democratic front-runner says she's raising big checks to help state committees, but they've gotten to keep only 1 percent of the $60 million raised. Those parties rely on that money to get re-elected, and they are getting 1 cent on the dollar. This is why they supported Hillary in the first place.
The Sanders campaign first raised questions about the arrangement in an April 18 letter from Brad Deutsch, the attorney for Sanders’ campaign, to U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chair of the DNC. […]
Congratulations, President Obama. You just made history. You endorsed the first presidential candidate under a criminal FBI investigation over another candidate, Sanders, that has a better chance of beating Trump. What a remarkable legacy to end eight years. What an amazing addition to your presidential library! You put a political party before your country, your legacy, your honor.
But in Warren and Obama, did we see an endorsement, or did we see fear?
[…]
"He testified how the Vanguard Corporation has printed billions of high quality fake dollars and paid mercenaries in Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, Libya, etc and paid mercenaries of Greystone and ISIS. He testified about connections and oil deals between Vanguard Corporation and ISIS. He described how all of the major mass murders and atrocities were organized by the Vanguard Corporation and Greystone mercenaries; how he communicated with Igor Kolomoyskiy and how together they were spreading fake dollars in Ukraine… On the day after that, Ukraine has a new government, chosen mainly by [Victoria] Nuland and John McCain from the National Republican Institute." […]
“Hillary Clinton has been used for the purpose of scuttling the Sanders campaign,” claims election fraud experts Cliff Arnebeck. […]
If this notorious CIA voter suppression PSYOP (psychological operation) didn't exist then, it exists now, and admitted by media figures like Chris Matthews themselves. This time, it is waged against Americans, not Venezuelans. Here's the proof the corporate media sees Americans as an enemy to be subjected to black op level psychological warfare. […]
"How could you? Do you realize that with that one comment you threw away whatever shot you may have had to fulfill your dream of convincing, brainwashing and/or bullying the super D's into handing you the nomination? How could you implode like that? It was a despicable act of desperation and, quite frankly, it was pathetic. With that one reckless opportunistic blunder you not only threw away the campaign, but your legacy as well. A once valiant warrior, you are now just a sad footnote in history. An embarrassment. I suspect you will never recover politically from your monumentally insensitive RFK comment, made in the very same week that Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy was diagnosed with a deadly brain tumor. "And so I can no longer support this destructive campaign of yours…" […]
Digging deep into Hillary's connections to Wall Street, Abby Martin reveals how the Clinton's multi-million-dollar political machine operates.
This episode chronicles the Clinton's rise to power in the 90s on a right-wing agenda, the Clinton Foundation's revolving door with Gulf state monarchies, corporations and the world's biggest financial institutions, and the establishment of the hyper-aggressive "Hillary Doctrine" while Secretary of State. […]
Download the PDF, This should have gone viral a long time ago. Share so everyone knows what is really at stake. Is the President of the United actually subordinate to Hillary Clinton to the point she could make presidential decisions without his consent or knowledge (hence the private server), and in refusing to allow indictment, will the entire nation know for certain we have no republic to speak of? […]
Copyright 2023 The Impious Digest