Articles by Independent Press

“The file included documentation of a 2003 preliminary report on 9/11 which identified the event as a nuclear demolition on behalf of a terrorist organization that had accessed nuclear material from US stockpiles though Israeli penetration of the Department of Energy. It further alleged that the Department of Homeland Security had been established to manage the coverup and silence whistleblowers.” […]

Hillary’s coronation was strange indeed. From the beginning, the DNC was ruthlessly suppressing all challengers, and even members of Congress who supported Sanders were warned not to, or else. Only four known Democrats in Congress, out of hundreds, are not supporting Hillary Clinton. That’s a shakedown. That is the essence of racketeering: cooperate, or else. That’s why otherwise reasonable people say Hillary’s phony lead is “insurmountable.” But for the hundreds of delegates who announced their support before Sanders even ran, willing and unwilling, and those pledged now and are in any way tied to the Hillary Victory Fund, this would be a good time to distance themselves from ground zero. […]

I knew this smug, lying, pseudo-intellectual anteater was a fraud but it's always nice to be validated. […]

The Democratic front-runner says she's raising big checks to help state committees, but they've gotten to keep only 1 percent of the $60 million raised. Those parties rely on that money to get re-elected, and they are getting 1 cent on the dollar. This is why they supported Hillary in the first place.

The Sanders campaign first raised questions about the arrangement in an April 18 letter from Brad Deutsch, the attorney for Sanders’ campaign, to U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chair of the DNC. […]

Congratulations, President Obama. You just made history. You endorsed the first presidential candidate under a criminal FBI investigation over another candidate, Sanders, that has a better chance of beating Trump. What a remarkable legacy to end eight years. What an amazing addition to your presidential library! You put a political party before your country, your legacy, your honor.

But in Warren and Obama, did we see an endorsement, or did we see fear?
[…]

"He testified how the Vanguard Corporation has printed billions of high quality fake dollars and paid mercenaries in Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, Libya, etc and paid mercenaries of Greystone and ISIS. He testified about connections and oil deals between Vanguard Corporation and ISIS. He described how all of the major mass murders and atrocities were organized by the Vanguard Corporation and Greystone mercenaries; how he communicated with Igor Kolomoyskiy and how together they were spreading fake dollars in Ukraine… On the day after that, Ukraine has a new government, chosen mainly by [Victoria] Nuland and John McCain from the National Republican Institute." […]

“Hillary Clinton has been used for the purpose of scuttling the Sanders campaign,” claims election fraud experts Cliff Arnebeck. […]

If this notorious CIA voter suppression PSYOP (psychological operation) didn't exist then, it exists now, and admitted by media figures like Chris Matthews themselves. This time, it is waged against Americans, not Venezuelans. Here's the proof the corporate media sees Americans as an enemy to be subjected to black op level psychological warfare. […]

"How could you? Do you realize that with that one comment you threw away whatever shot you may have had to fulfill your dream of convincing, brainwashing and/or bullying the super D's into handing you the nomination? How could you implode like that? It was a despicable act of desperation and, quite frankly, it was pathetic. With that one reckless opportunistic blunder you not only threw away the campaign, but your legacy as well. A once valiant warrior, you are now just a sad footnote in history. An embarrassment. I suspect you will never recover politically from your monumentally insensitive RFK comment, made in the very same week that Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy was diagnosed with a deadly brain tumor. "And so I can no longer support this destructive campaign of yours…" […]

Download the PDF, This should have gone viral a long time ago. Share so everyone knows what is really at stake. Is the President of the United actually subordinate to Hillary Clinton to the point she could make presidential decisions without his consent or knowledge (hence the private server), and in refusing to allow indictment, will the entire nation know for certain we have no republic to speak of? […]

Based on a dipshit politician convinced that support of a boycott movement against Israeli companies constitutes a criminal act, this app was proposed. In the Old South, authorities tried to punish blacks that participated in the bus boycotts, so they tried to arrest any black people they saw walking. It backfired. An app like this could automatically boycott businesses behind this attack on free speech. […]

This is separate from the DNC emails, but likely more incriminating. The emails from Hillary’s private email server describe her working with Stratfor in the Ukrainian coup plot, as we saw in her correspondence with Victoria Nuland. They confirm what our intelligence experts noted all along, that the Russians, and other nations, hacked her server. Even if Obama gave her the green light to plan this coup, it would lead us to events that nearly caused a nuclear confrontation with Russia. Because these actions were hidden from Obama, it can be strongly argued she acted, willfully, without his knowledge and authority. This is why, among other reasons, the matter is incredibly serious. We already know, for a fact, that Russia has them (at least 22,000): they were used in a court case in Russia earlier this year […]

“But the point is they are not a free people now under us. They are not a free people, and we cannot fight communism terrorism all over the World, and I think we should have learned that lesson by now.” John Kerry. Once upon a time there was an idealistic man. Once there was a man with eyes to see, ears to hear, and a mouth to speak. He was a man that hated war, saw its futility and horrors, and saw who grew rich from the deaths and misery of millions. He was a man that recognized an endless war in Vietnam, and surely could spot it anywhere. He was a man who once advocated for peace “so when thirty years from now our brothers go down the street without a leg, without an arm, or a face, and small boys ask why, we will be able to say ‘Vietnam’ and not mean a desert, not a filthy obscene memory, but mean instead where America finally turned and where soldiers like us helped it in the turning.” […]