Was the Corporate Media Framing a False Flag Assassination Attempt?

CoGxct3WYAAB1S5
PROOF OF VOTER PSYOP: DNC leak detailing “dangerous Trump” narrative that would be conveyed to hundreds of news assets at once. This document was secret for a reason, as it outlines social engineering and conditioning using media monopolies.

CoJOAxKUsAAS_A1
It is believed that Hillary Clinton has almost 200 known journalists on the take in media channels throughout the west. That is why it is so easy to spread a narrative. More on this here.

“The emails contain enough damaging information to put Hillary Clinton in jail for selling State Department ‘official acts’ in exchange for contributions to the Clinton Foundation and as a reward for Clinton Foundation donors becoming clients of Teneo, the consulting firm established by Bill Clinton’s White House ‘body man’ Doug Band.” Bill Still

According to one Secret Service agent, someone even “above Soros” came storming into the White House and began discussing a plan was to stage an attempt on Hillary’s life and then blame it on Trump.  Any supporting evidence?
Consider the following:

rankin_enlarged1
Oswald, a known CIA operative, was also working with the FBI undercover to expose a “Cuban conspiracy” to assassinate President Kennedy. He became the prefect patsy.

Before this happens, a controlled, state media will often  frame a candidate with a narrative to make the coming false flag plausible. This is likely why so many media outlets began hyping the “Trump encouraging followers to kill Hillary” false narrative. Before the Kennedy assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald made a notable appearance on television discussing his pro-Castro views. This created the narrative that Castro was responsible for the assassination, for example. Oswald was, indeed, a patsy, and for those who still believe the Warren Commission, this link may prove informative.

Gannaway_Oswald-arrest_11-22-63The explosion of talking heads discussing a threat that Trump never made relied on the fact few would ever see the clip itself, and even when they did show it, they completely distorted the context, which a 12 year Secret Service veteran called them on when when Don Lemon was humiliated on national television. This “Dangerous Donald” tactic is actually outlined in the DNC Trump playbook leak. The same leaks revealed Sanders “Bernie Bros” supporters could be portrayed as violent, too, and they were.

Dangerous-Donald-Trump-Narrative..
A narrative, in political terms, is a fictional story that is intended to frame a candidate in a positive or negative light. In modern attacks they are conveyed by manipulative and deceptive editing of video and/or audio which is then amplified in the media. It is the opposite of the history of a candidate, which relies on facts and records. Here, the DNC outlines the framing of Donald Trump and the narrative to be used. they also did this to Bernie Sanders, with that narrative being that he’s a commie, crazy, and his supporters are violent, and dangerous “Bernie Bros.”

DNC leaks confirm they not only have the media assets and control to do it, they did it throughout the Sanders campaign and now the Trump campaign.

CNN’s role in this scenario is palpable. Other pro-Hillary assets strongly followed suit: The New York Times, MSNBC, etc. You can see in this interview with a Secret Service agent who turned the tables on a hysterical Don Lemon, who was doing his level best to try and make Trump look like a homicidal maniac. It is obvious that a narrative for a staged assassination attempt was now there.


Considering the fact that the FBI and U.S. attorneys have been investigating the Clinton Foundation for corruption, thus bypassing the DOJ, it seems likely Hillary would not escape indictment this time. Such a false flag would, if believed, put Trump out of the running.

Published on Aug 15, 2016 by Bill Still

According to Trump adviser, Roger Stone, Julian Assange of Wikileaks has a complete set of Hillary Clinton’s 36,000 emails which she scrubbed off her illegal home server.

Stone told WND’s Jerome Corsi that he has communicated directly with Assange.

“In the next series of emails Assange plans to release, I have reason to believe the Clinton Foundation scandals will surface to keep Bill and Hillary from returning to the White House,” said Stone.

He said that the next batch coming from Wikileaks will include Clinton’s communications with Clinton’s State Dept. aides, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin.

“The Democrats are right to fear Assange’s next email drops will be devastating to Hillary.”

“Assange claims the emails contain enough damaging information to put Hillary Clinton in jail for selling State Department ‘official acts’ in exchange for contributions to the Clinton Foundation and as a reward for Clinton Foundation donors becoming clients of Teneo, the consulting firm established by Bill Clinton’s White House ‘body man’ Doug Band,” he said.

About Independent Press 458 Articles
Methinks I am a conspiracy theorist. Art thou? Thou block, thou stone, thou worse than senseless thing, for whilst thou slept didst this become a badge of honor. Informed dissent shall always prevail, wherefore art thou worthy, or art thou this unwholesome fool in the group conformity experiment herein?

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply