invasion

A gravely worded new Security Council (SC) circulating in the Kremlin today outlining the agenda for the talks this coming week between President Putin and US National Security Advisor John Bolton states that “of most serious concern” to the Russian Federation is the United States planned invasion of Mexico that the US Congress, two days ago, quietly approved $82 billion to begin the combat preparations for—with  Security Council Member, and Chairwoman of the Council of Federation, Valentina Matviyenko further noting that the American people appear to be “mentally blinded/clueless” to the war propaganda techniques being poured onto them designed to whip them into a war frenzy prior to this invasion by splitting their left-right political factions—and as the US had effectively done in the months leading up to World War II to gain their citizens support to declare war on Nazi Germany.  […]

The United States Nuclear Risk Reduction Center(NRRC) notifying the Russian Navy that “combat operations” are предстоящий (impending, close at hand, near, fast approaching, coming, forthcoming) in the high seas off both the Eastern and Western coasts of the United States of Mexico—thus confirming the MoD’s 2 June assessment that the US is preparing to invade their southern neighbor—and that since has been further confirmed by the US Navy rapidly returning to port to take part in this invasion 5 of its most powerful Carrier Strike Groups—and whose aircraft carriers include CVN-71 USS Theodore Roosevelt that docked in San Diego on 7 May—CVN-78 USS Gerald R. Ford that docked in Norfolk on 9 June—CVN-77 USS George H.W. Bush that docked in Norfolk on 13 June—CVN-72 USS Abraham Lincoln that docked in Norfolk on 14 June—and CVN-74 USS John C. Stennis that docked in San Diego on 18 June.   […]

With the Russian diplomatic mission in San Francisco having been in existence since 1852, with its current location being sovereign Federation territory since 1972, the United States’ gross violation of their “receiving State” duties to protect this diplomatic building and its diplomats is, in fact, an “act of war”—and the Foreign Ministry calling it for what it is, “a blunt act of hostility” and “an occupation”. […]