The Question of Presidential Authority in Executive Decisions, and Who Actually Had It: Hillary or Obama?

download (1)

CjiuLrSWgAQwqYzThis is not so much about the private emails as much as what was in them, on who’s authority major state decisions were made, and the fact the servers were hacked and compromised national security. The illicit emails, and the way the establishment is handling it, suggest Obama was or is subordinate to Clinton, and is protecting her for that very reason.  If this is true, the office of the President of the United States is a sham. Why? It means a wealthy private citizen, be it herself or George Soros, can make decisions regarding state matters without oversight or consequence, decisions only the President of the United States can make, particularly arms sales and in her case, coup plotting in the Ukraine. You can do a lot of damage with the powers of the Secretary of State, without the oversight of the White House, and especially when you were getting hacked all along. This is why every Secretary of State before her agreed to be interviewed by the Inspector General, they know, at stake is the credibility and standing of the highest office in the United States. This is why they understood this is a matter of the highest national security concern. She was literally cutting secret deals under Obama’s nose, and aside from the illegality of the transactions working under the color of authority (you can’t when you a are hiding it from the authority on whose behalf you presume  to speak), our national security was compromised.

All agreed to be interviewed except Hillary.

[pullquote]If this is true, the office of the President of the United States is a sham. It means a subordinate or wealthy private citizen, be it herself or George Soros, can make decisions regarding state matters without oversight or consequence, decisions only the President of the United States can make. [/pullquote]It would also explain his inability, or unwillingness to create an independent commission to bypass a conflict of interest due to AG Loretta’s Lynch’s close ties to the Clintons. This email and video accompanying it, incidentally, are proof of conspiracy to engage in a felony act, to violate Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code, there is some evidence of a cover-up regarding what was compromised. This itself would be a violation of the 2009 Federal Records Act and the Freedom of Information Act. She knew the private server was illegal and a threat to national security. But if, indeed, her authority supersedes Obama’s, at least in secret, if indeed she is Obama’s superior, it explains why Hillary is the “inevitable” candidate with the “insurmountable” lead. It would also explain why, justifiably, the FBI is pissed. We already know, for a fact, that the servers were hacked by Russia and other countries. Hillary’s hacked emails to Victoria “Fuck the EU” Nuland were even used in a Russian court case against a Ukrainian pilot earlier this year.

All of that, of course, is just the start. It is what was in those emails that matters.

Hillary broke the President's chain of authority, she made national security decisions, devastating ones like waging war, secretly and without oversight or Presidential consent. The emails from Hillary's private email server describe her working with Stratfor in the Ukrainian coup plot, with Victoria Nuland. They confirm what our intelligence experts noted, that the Russians, and other nations, hacked her server. Even if Obama gave her the green light to plan this coup, it would lead us to events that nearly caused a nuclear confrontation with Russia. Because these actions were hidden from Obama, it can be strongly argued she acted, willfully, without his knowledge and authority. But the media pundits say it's ok.
Hillary broke the President’s chain of authority, she made national security decisions, devastating ones like waging war, secretly and without oversight or Presidential consent. The emails from Hillary’s private email server describe her working with Stratfor in the Ukrainian coup plot, with Victoria Nuland. They confirm what our intelligence experts noted, that the Russians, and other nations, hacked her server. Even if Obama gave her the green light to plan this coup, it would lead us to events that nearly caused a nuclear confrontation with Russia. Because these actions were hidden from Obama, it can be strongly argued she acted, willfully, without his knowledge and authority. But the media pundits say it’s ok.

Those emails to Victoria Nuland, incidentally, the private ones, may have something to do with this:

[pullquote]This is not so much about the private emails as much as what was in them, on who’s authrity major state decisions were made, and the fact the servers were hacked and compromised national security.[/pullquote]”He testified how the Vanguard Corporation has printed billions of high quality fake dollars and paid mercenaries in Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, Libya, etc and paid mercenaries of Greystone and ISIS. He testified about connections and oil deals between Vanguard Corporation and ISIS. He described how all of the major mass murders and atrocities were organized by the Vanguard Corporation and Greystone mercenaries; how he communicated with Igor Kolomoyskiy and how together they were spreading fake dollars in Ukraine… On the day after that, Ukraine has a new government, chosen mainly by [Victoria] Nuland and John McCain from the National Republican Institute. When the US administration recognized that the snipers were trained NATO (in Poland – TV), and the whole operation was organized by Vanguard, the CIA and the State Department – Obama almost had a heart attack.” As The Intercept notes regarding Hillary Clinton’s duplicitous plan to reign in banks: “Clinton’s plan was mute on a key sector of the industry: asset management firms, like BlackRock or Vanguard or Fidelity, which control a staggering $30 trillion in global wealth.”

ISIS, Neo-Nazis, and Vanguard Corporation’s Counterfeit Dollars to Fund Terrorism

It is also why Trump, and Clinton, were afraid to debate Sanders. Unofficially, she may be Trump’s boss as well. We’ve all seen the pictures of Hillary and Bill at Trump’s wedding. We’ll see how he handles this, being the reality show thespian that he is.

Cj9UiUrXIAA8ZaJ
Donald Trump has a long history with the Clintons. A very friendly one, albeit sometimes friends fight. We’ll see.

There is actually video evidence of conspiracy in her discussing this with a wealthy contributor. It’s gone viral.

And finally, as to the question of Hillary acting under the color of presidential authority:

Screenshot_5Screenshot_4

When what you see in the Globe is reflected in mainstream news outlets, you know it’s bad.
About Independent Press 458 Articles
Methinks I am a conspiracy theorist. Art thou? Thou block, thou stone, thou worse than senseless thing, for whilst thou slept didst this become a badge of honor. Informed dissent shall always prevail, wherefore art thou worthy, or art thou this unwholesome fool in the group conformity experiment herein?

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply