– Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, The New Freedom. 1913
“The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation… The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties .. and control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, Legislative bodies, schools, our newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.”
– New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, New York Times. March 26.1922
For our purposes we shall thenceforth refer to the controversial book in question as The Protocols of The XXXX for short. Now read it and ask yourself if the outline for global domination by a long-established international banking cabal not only works but if it is behind two world wars and a plan for a third, the assault on religion, religious wars, presidential assassinations, countless genocides, dynastic rule in America, e.g. the Bush Dynasty (extended through Jeb Bush) and proposed Clinton Dynasty, extended through Hillary Clinton, which are both gearing for an AIPAC spurred and unwinnable oil war in the middle east against Russia and Iran. In Protocol 1, we read in regards to dynasties:
“… the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political — to all these things the PEOPLE paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause.”
Mad Money’s Jim Cramer: “The Council of Foreign Relations, the Bavarian Illuminati and the Queen of England are not all bad…”
At first dismissive, then apologetic, Cramer is discussing entities that do exist symbiotically and maintain massive influence in the world. His own role is minuscule, because he spoke of it openly and is therefore disposable. This was a message for investors that can read between the lines. His advice for investors to buy into subprime mortgages during the housing bubble that led to the 2008 led to the downfall of many, and was ridiculed by Jon Stewart. See: Daily Show vs. Mad Money: Jon Stewart, Jim Cramer feud raises questions about what CNBC knew about financial meltdown. Like J.P Morgan, Goldman Sachs, et al, Cramer was betting against his own advice, and was among the few who gained when the bubble burst.
The Illuminati Today…
“My determination to eliminate Robert F. Kennedy is becoming more the more an unshakeable obsession… Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated.”[easyrotator]erc_57_1425998872[/easyrotator]
Monarch Delta Assassins are twinned or come in teams of four. Sirhan’s accomplice was the infamous “Girl in the Polka Dot Dress.”
Was the Polka Dot Girl “Peggy Osterkamp”? “She practically stepped on me, and she said, “We’ve shot him. We’ve shot him.” Then I said, “Who did you shoot?” And she said, “We shot Senator Kennedy.” And I says, “Oh, sure.” She came running down the stairs, very fast, and then the boy in the gold sweater came running down after her, and I walked down the stairs.” L.A.P.D Interview of Sandy Serrano, 2:35 a.m., June 5, 1968, p. 27.
In one of Sirhan’s notebooks the name “Peggy Osterkamp” was written over and over. “I love you, Peggy,” in one place and in another, “Peggy Osterkamp Peggy Osterkamp Peggy Osterkamp Peggy Sirhan.”
When Dr. Marcus asked Sirhan who Peggy Osterkamp was, he said that she was just a girl he’d met a few times at the ranch where he’d worked as an exerciser of horses. Dr. Marcus asked Sirhan if he’d ever dated her, and Sirhan told Marcus the story he’d told the public defender about the night of the assassination.
Operation Mind Control, by Walter Bowart
“Delta alters –are activated to kill by the following three things: seeing specific clothing, items held in a persons hand, and particular words. Since these items would specific for a particular murder there is no particular specifics that can be given.” In this case, as we can see from Sirhan Sirhan’s writings, the word and object was “port wine.” Sen. Robert Kennedy was shot in the kitchen area of the Ambassador Hotel,where port wine was stored.
In 1968 almost no one knew of the Illuminati. Sirhan writes “Master approached, let us do it.” Above we see Sirhan mention the Illuminati three times; and also one “Master Kuthumi”, which may be the pseudonym used by his hypnoconditioner, or Master; believed to be the late Dr. William Joseph Bryan.
Master Kithumi is a reference to an occult master who gave Madam Helena Blavatsky her Secret Doctrine, a theory of 7 root races, particularly the supremacy of the Aryan race, upon which Nazism was founded. And speaking of mind control, Sirhan Sirhan was actually put under hypnosis by the LAPD to determine his programmer, as it had been evident he had been programmed to kill through hypnosis.
Illuminati black magic indeed. Here’s Sirhan’s hypnotic induction countdown.[ca_audio url_mp3=”http://impiousdigest.com/wp-content/uploads/Sirhan.mp3″ width=300 url_ogg=”” align=”none”]
The Los Angeles Police Department attempts to find Sirhan’s programmer, who was actually sitting right there at the time: CIA hypno-conditioner Dr. William Bryan. However, if you pay attention, it is painfully clear the hypnotist is trying to implant memories, not retrieve them, by repeating “you’re killing Kennedy, huh? Reach for your gun, Sirhan! Reach for your gun! You’re killing Kennedy!”
Project Artichoke and the Programmed Assassin
“1. The ARTICHOKE Team visited [redacted] during period 8 January to 15 January 1954. The purpose of the visit was to give an evaluation of a hypothetical problem, namely: Can an individual of ****** descent be made to perform an act of attempted assassination involuntarily under the influence of ARTICHOKE?
a. The essential elements of the problem are as follows:
(1) As a “trigger mechanism” for a bigger project, it was proposed that an individual of ****** descent approximately 35 years old, well educated, proficient in English and well established socially and politically in the ****** Government be induced under ARTICHOKE to perform an act, involuntarily, of attempted assassination against a prominent ****** politician or if necesssary, against an American official…
Source: Page from a CIA memorandum from 1954. Published in Phil Melanson’s The Robert F. Kennedy Assassination, (New York: Shapolsky Publishers, Inc, 1994). In the exhibits (page not numbered).
Lone nuts with remarkable access then and now: Sarah Jane Moore, Squeaky Fromme, attempted to kill President Gerald Ford. Fromme was the product of a man convicted of programming assassins in the United States. You may have heard of him: Charles Manson, who programmed a Family to kill in the Tate and LaBianca murders in 1969, hoping to start a race war. James Earl Ray, Sirhan Sirhan, Arthur Bremer, John Hinkley. In lower inset is Oscar Ortega, a recent shooter who believes Obama is the Antichrist, a belief literally promulgated in the Christian Zionist* right-wing media since day one. In handcuffs a White House intruder, Omar Gonzalez, who jumped over the fence with a knife and made it into the interior, the Green Room.
*Christian Zionist defined herein as any “Israel first” Christian organization led politically and spiritually by people who don’t even believe in Jesus.
The oligarchy that is pushing a Bush-Clinton dynasty is not lost on mainstream news assets as well. Even Time Magazine covered it on May, 2014: “A 2016 Bush-Clinton Match-Up? Gag Me.”
Consider the obscene income inequality prescribed in the protocols, the neo-serfdom, which we are facing now, over 100 years later. We are under the most corrupt Supreme Court in the history of the United States and this, too, bows to the will of Wall Street. Above Wall Street are the main puppeteers, the federal reserve, a system of private banking in which the nation’s system of credit is privately concentrated in a handful of men the media naturally portrays as blameless or ignores altogether, exactly as writ in Protocol 20 by the men who printed the money then, and print it now:
“A loan is — an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 percent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty — treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt. From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealthy foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.”
That’s the federal reserve and International Monetary Fund, that is central banking, everything our founding fathers and greatest minds fervently opposed as the greatest threat to our democracy.
“A coalition of multinational corporate executives, big-city bankers, and hungry power brokers… want to give you George Bush… their purpose is to control the American government.”
– Ronald Reagan, 1980.
Global March: Protests around world against Monsanto
Reagan was right. The Bush Dynasty is responsible for the most compromised Supreme Court the nation has ever endured: Alito, Thomas, and Roberts were seated by the Bush family, which fully illustrates the destructive power of political dynasties when it comes to filling the Supreme Court with extensions of corporate will, not just men sympathetic to them. In simpler terms, 1/3 of the Supreme Court is owned by the Bush dynasty and its corporate and banking alliances. This cannot be more certain. The Bush family, since Prescott Bush’s failed 1930s attempt to overthrow FDR in the Business Plot, had made it their business to turn America into a fascist state controlled by Wall Street bankers.
The rulings of the justices have been 100% consistent with that objective; such as seating George W. Bush as president in a fraudulent election, ruling that corporations are people to undermine fair elections, equating money with free speech to perpetuate a fascist oligarchy, destroying the Writ of Habeus Corpus to allow for the secret and indefinite detention of citizens, dismantling the Voting Rights Act, removing the last vestige of campaign contribution limits, and countless other rulings consistent with the terrifying protocols to be discussed herein. Again, capital’s Supreme Court, for it is not ours but that of international capital; is a court which defined corporations as people rather than business contracts which they really are, but the person-hood given to corporations, particularly oil companies and banks, makes them not just people; but a special type of people that cannot breathe, walk, talk or bleed; that can own no conscience or soul, cannot go to jail, that pay no taxes, that may defy the law fearing no more than a paltry fine no matter how deadly or grievous the offense, be it fomenting a civil war here and abroad, political assassinations, dumping toxic wastes into our drinking water, money laundering for drug cartels, war lords, black market arms dealers, et cetera.
The NDAA Explained in 3 Minutes
Any sane man could tell the difference between a piece of paper; a business contract that is a corporation, and a human being, but not this august body of men cherry-picked by the Bush Dynasty. Their robes would imply they were honorable men, and they are not, it would imply they represented the interests of the American people or humanity in general, and they do not. Their positions would imply they have character, and they have none, else they would not have been seated. At the risk of proffering an ad hominem attack, it can be seriously argued these men are psychopaths. Why? For starters, psychopaths have no problem killing innocents.