Methinks I am a conspiracy theorist. Art thou? Thou block, thou stone, thou worse than senseless thing, for whilst thou slept didst this become a badge of honor. Informed dissent shall always prevail, wherefore art thou worthy, or art thou this unwholesome fool in the group conformity experiment herein?
Wikileaks proves DNC rigged primaries, robbed donors, undermined democracy. In rigging this primary election, in her now proven control of the media, she has exhibited more criminality and danger than Trump. For Sanders to support her he would literally be supporting the greater threat to democracy, a truly fascist state, as defined under the international standards regarding the absence of free elections. Perhaps he should go Green, contest, or pass the torch to someone else if the burden has become too heavy. Either way, as the DNC gets sued for defrauding donors of money by rigging the election for Hillary, Sanders needs to stop pretending there was no fraud lest further emails discredit him and loyalists as well. The absolute worst thing he can do, at this opportunity, is to bend a knee to the Clinton machine while hobbling the Greens or Libertarians hoping to create a lasting third party. […]
Seth Rich’s social media handle was “panda” and it was known among his friends in the DNC. Did Hillary publicly threaten to “shoot the panda” in a Vanity Fair article of January 24, 2016? Julian Assange has already strongly suggested it was Seth Rich. Kim Dotcom, through whom the data was passed, is willing to testify it was Rich. Hillary’s campaign manager John Podesta, who threatened to make an “example” of leakers whether or not they were guilty, works for The Washington Post. Worse, in clear mockery of the shooting of Seth Rich, a memorial bike rack at the DNC headquarters in Miami refers to the Panda. The DNC also hired a “spokesman” to gaslight the grieving family and to attack investigators of an unsolved murder case, which they treat as closed. […]
Please note both are fear-based narratives consistent with the most nefarious psyops and propaganda in politics. A narrative, in political terms, is a fictional story that is intended to frame a candidate in a positive or negative light. In modern attacks they are conveyed by manipulative and deceptive editing of video and/or audio which is then amplified in the media.
It is the opposite of the history of a candidate, which relies on facts and records. Here, the DNC outlines the framing of Donald Trump and the narrative to be used. they also did this to Bernie Sanders, with that narrative being that he's a commie, crazy, and his supporters are violent, and dangerous "Bernie Bros." The term framing is self-evident: you are setting someone up for something they did not, or do not do. Bernie, in the chair throwing myth, was framed. […]