Las Vegas is not the only place that relies on people who are bad at math. To discount coincidence, the media counts on our inability to properly formulate probability in states of anxiety or fear.


Bizarro

Malaysia has just lost two airliners in the space of 5 months. What could it have done to spawn such bad luck? Is it the fact that Malaysia issued arrest warrants for George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, John Yoo, Donald Rumsfeld, et al for war crimes? And the fact that because of them, you’re not seeing any of them flying outside the United States?

It is believed Bush emissaries had threatened the Malaysian government against such a trial, and that if they dared hold it warned of severe consequences. Since neither tragedy was an accident, it’s hard to see things otherwise: Malaysia is being targeted for reprisal as promised, and Russia is a possible false flag.There are actually two known precursors and templates for what is happening today. The first is Operation Gladio, the employment of neo-Nazis in Europe for terrorist operations by right-wingers that would frame the opposition, and Operation Northwoods, which was drafted in 1962 and rejected by President Kennedy. The latter involved downing a passenger jet and blaming another nation. freda-falsoe-flag

Here’s a good article by criminologist Jason Kissner on the very, very slim odds of this incident being chance alone. To wit:

The analogy with MH 17 is as follows. If five months ago (before the vanishing of MH 370) you had contemplated the likelihood that the next two major airline disasters to receive massive global coverage would each involve Malaysia Airlines, you would have been justified in concluding that the likelihood was very low indeed. By analogy, it would be like specifying only an {H, H} sequence as the outcome ahead of time (a {T, T} sequence would represent the same airline as having been involved, but not Malaysia Airlines).

Now what the Western mainstream media are implicitly arguing is that MH 370 and MH 17 have no real link and are only connected with massive airline disasters in recent months by chance;they’re saying that it could just as well have been any two flights so linked (by analogy, {H, H} or {H, T} or {T, H} or {T, T}). If this argument is valid, nothing at all should be made at all of the fact that Malaysia Airlines was involved in both instances, since all possible sequences are accounted for and no sequence is much more likely than any other.

And yet, the evidence presented in this article suggests that MH 370 and MH 17 are linked in ways that might not be due to chance. Both MH 370 and MH 17 appear to have lost communicative contact, and both appear to have veered off course on very unusual routes. How many aircraft of other airlines have done so in recent months, never mind how many of the 55 aircraft over Donetsk did so on July 17? How many aircraft other than MH 17 had their inaugural voyage on the date of July 17? [TWA Flight 800 went down on July 17, 1996.]

These considerations suggest that, in fact,in the cases of MH 370 and MH 17 we might not be dealing with a “fair coin.”

A simpler question is this: betting on these odds is something Las Vegas wouldn’t do, and no mathematician would see possible, so why should you believe the corporate media’s absurd little narrative? because Rachel Maddow or Bill O’Reilly say so? If I bet you 1,000 dollars that, say, two Boeing 777 Virgin Airlines passenger jets would veer off course mysteriously, then lose contact, and be downed in the space of the next five months by chance alone, would you take the bet? If you like easy money, I think you would, and you would be very mean, because you would be taking money from an idiot. (That’s like stealing.)

In fact, the donkey dicks in the mainstream media have failed to tell you that you are likelier to win the California lottery than for the aforementioned MH17 scenario to take place by chance. That is one in 42 million. If you consider that it happened on the anniversary of the navy’s accidental missile downing and cover-up of Flight 800 on July 17, 1996, things get stranger still, because the odds get even more astronomical those particular coincidences would happen on that particular anniversary. Is that not peculiar? an accidental missile downing and cover-up on the same exact day? There’s two explanations to choose from: the impossible odds or the premeditated selection of that date for its symbolic impact.

Strings of coincidences are always created and do not exist in nature. When Wall Street is involved, they also need to know a specific date because their aim is to engage in “risk free” speculative trading like we saw just before 9/11, like dumping airline stocks knowing their value will plummet.

Occam’s Razor, and disturbing evidence, dictates the latter. Here’s what we have from 21st Century Wire:

US-NATO’s Military Drill in the Black Sea Ended on July 17th

Russia’s Satellite Data and Public Presentation on Monday July 21st has put Washington on its back foot. The existence of this intelligence, now made public, along with other data in Russia’s possession, means that the Washington cannot show the real intelligence – which they too have. It’s no coincidence that US and NATO conducted a large-scale military and intelligence drill in the Black Sea just south of Crimea named, SEA BREEZE 2014, which just so happened to end on…July 17th. The drill included hundreds of US military specialists running ‘war simulations’ in electronic warfare, data collection from a spy satellite, and ‘monitoring’ of all passenger aircraft flying in the region. A massive drill – yet another improbable coincidence.

Another smoking gun: Is it a coincidence that the US had its new experimental satellite positioned over Eastern Europe for 1-2 hours, and directly over Donetsk in eastern Ukraine from  5:06  pm – 5:21  pm. Taking this fact into consideration, alongside the other improbable ‘coincidences’, leads to an almost certain conclusion.

In addition to SEA BREEZE, both US and British armed forces had also scheduled a concurrent military exercise, code named, Rapid Trident 2014, a NATO event which takes place annually in and around the Ukraine, designed to “promote regional stability and security, strengthen partnership capacity and foster trust while improving interoperability between the land forces of Ukraine, and NATO and partner nations,” according to the US Forces in Europe website. Since March, the Pentagon has kept quiet regarding the number of US forces, and hardware assets expected to participate in the maneuvers.

According to US Army spokesman Col. Steven Warren, Rapid Trident is the only Ukraine military exercise the US planned to participate in this year, and it’s main purpose was, “To help the Ukrainian military improve its troops and weapons operability with NATO forces.”

When it was clear no US satellite data would be released to counter Russia’s exculpatory data, US intelligence officials announced on Tuesday, July 22 that it was an accidental downing, by a military outfit, but that it was not linked to the Russians.

FAIL!

The night prior, the Daily Show and the Colbert Report lampooned the impossibility of anyone other than Russia shooting down the plane, and sadly, Stewart resorted to a straw man. In this logical fallacy you take the silliest argument proposed by the opponent’s side, or even create one, then ridicule it as being their actual stance, only to declare victory in the debate without ever addressing the actual argument.

The straw man was the alleged Russian official whom, conveniently off camera, claimed the plane was pre-loaded with dead bodies in Amsterdam. However, the official Russian response had been immediately known and circulated: the Russians presented satellite data supporting their account that a Ukrainian Su-25 fighter jet had been trailing MH17 and that missile batteries had been moved by Ukrainians into a rebel area just prior, and that they knew we had a live satellite feed over the area as well. Because of that, they demanded we release our data. That was Putin’s official response, but Comedy Central is part of the mainstream media and didn’t just ignore it, they completely misled the public on what the response actually was.

That US data is still classified, and it has not and will not be released willingly because it doesn’t support the original account. What Stewart used to buttress his assertion that Russia downed the plane were the very networks his show is dedicated to mocking. Same thing with Colbert. They didn’t appeal to reason this time. They didn’t air the official Russian press briefing disclosing their sat data and their demands to see ours. How could they? It was a rock solid defense and they had thrown all their eggs into one basket, as they had bet that the establishment spin machine would win again. Don’t get me wrong. I love Stewart and I think he is a good man. Colbert too. But we are in a new paradigm now, and you can’t use the same diaper you just threw out to change the baby.

1415993366158_wps_23_Russian_Channel_1_shows_v

Russian satellite view of MH17 shoot-down credible as anything else presented by Kiev, which is nothing.

CBUwLJ1UcAAu-bD

Russian satellite view of MH17 shoot-down credible as anything else presented by Kiev, which is nothing.

In the same episode he opened with the painful observation that we have a controlled media and that he cannot even say Israel or question its state policies without being viciously attacked. Celebrities are being warned by their agents not to tweet or post opinions on international events, particularly Gaza, and that’s why they have tweeted support for Palestine and then immediately deleted them. Stewart’s observation is true. Viacom is one one of the five corporations controlling the western broadcast media, and they own Comedy Central. That’s why Colbert had a pundit to ridicule anyone who questioned the official story regarding Russian responsibility the day before she, too, was contradicted by US intelligence. It was the only move left if you don’t have satellite data required to convince allied nations. Here’s what Stewart’s straw man was designed to conceal: the day prior, the entire world saw this:

Even the The Wall Street Journal reported that:

In an elaborate presentation displaying radar and satellite imagery, Mr. Makushev said it was likely that the second airplane was a Ukrainian fighter jet. He also showed satellite photos allegedly portraying several Buk ground-to-air missile systems in the area close to where the plane crashed. The systems, he said, could only belong to the Ukrainian military. Ukraine has accused Russia of giving the rebels a Buk system, with which they then shot down the passenger jet.

Mr. Makushev said the airplane deviated from its course by 14 kilometers, but then attempted to return to its course, before crashing shortly after.

He said Russia is prepared to hand all of the information it has to European authorities, which included satellite imagery and data from its own radars.



July 21, 2014

Briefing from the Russian Defense Ministry with new details about the crash Boeing 777 near Donetsk.

cnn-no-news-bearers-caption_stewartIn the meantime, Stewart was quoting CNN, screen captures of social media posts, and implying that a Wikipedia entry on the Ukraine downing, because it had a Russian IP address, that was proof positive of a Russian cover-up. He should know better. CNN isn’t even worth addressing as a credible source. Stewart never does and constantly compares it to a FOX News wanna-be, so why risk his credibility with them now?

Screen captures of “rebels celebrating the downing” in tweets or sloppily edited audio clips of rebel chatter can be dismissed immediately and have been. Most embarrassing of all, however, is the claim that an edited Wikipedia entry with a Russian IP address means Putin did it. What if that IP address was from the American Embassy in Moscow? Or what if it’s a pro-Kiev Russian, or even a western asset? What if, like most proxy servers used to anonymize browsers that IP address actually originated elsewhere? Yet the most absurd point of all is assuming whomever edited that entry had a role in the downing. freda-fox

But the generally trustworthy Stewart and Colbert made it appear as if the official Russian response was the “dead bodies in the plane” theory, when all they had to do to see the response was to pick up the fucking paper that morning. We’re not even talking a liberal paper, we’re talking the Wall Street Journal, war hawk Rupert Murdoch’s paper, and he makes Josef Goebbels look like an amateur.

So who came out looking foolish? Right now, it certainly isn’t the Russians. It’s not even a matter of being pro-Russian. They’re run by oligarchs too, but the main thing that redeems them comparatively is that their oligarchs aren’t spending their money to take away your vote and basic human rights, be it the right to drinking water, the Bill of Rights, or habeus corpus. Here, however, oligarchs that control the media are manipulating both parties to do just that in a Hegelian system that controls the opposites and manipulates the outcome. All you need to do that is money, and to give to both parties if you are wealthy enough. In such a system the odds of getting what your interests desire are 100%.

Ask the Koch Brothers and the dark money system they have in play with money going to both parties, not just the GOP. Just how bad is the propaganda? Here’s an example. A Howard Stern fan pretends he’s a US Staff Sergeant and prank calls MSNBC’s The Cycle to report he witnessed the plane being downed by a “blast of wind out of Howard Stern’s ass.” Most hilarious of all, that prank call was the show’s “breaking news.”

“BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Staff Sergeant Says He Witnessed Missile Strike”

You have to hear her response, and the caller’s surprise, to truly appreciate the phoned-in “intelligence” the State Department is relying on.

Why Coincidence Matters

The matter of coincidence cannot be stressed enough, because that’s how spooks, mobsters, politicians communicate when they’ve done something so horrible they dare not take credit openly, but still want it tacitly known that it was them that they might instill fear.

Strings of coincidences are always created and do not exist in nature.

When Wall Street is involved, they also need to know a specific date because their aim is to engage in “risk free” speculative trading like dumping airline and Russian stocks knowing their value will plummet. Right before 9-11, the CIA noted there was a lot of trading in airline stocks, which of course plummeted that day, and that every high ranking official in the Bush Administration had been warned not to fly in the days before 9-11, as we saw with John Ashcroft.

The evidence that this speculative trading also happened on July 17, 2014 is overwhelming. Numerous appearances by Dick Cheney on FOX News with dire warnings of “another 9-11” served as an excellent call for insiders to start selling, and people did, especially since it was clear something special would happen in the Ukraine on July 17, 2014, when the US-NATO military exercises in the Black Sea would end. Cheney, like Hunter Biden, has considerable interests in the energy and defense sector, being an oil man, and the Ukrainian crisis is all about shale gas. Before we get to the question of the downing of a Boeing 777, it is curious indeed it happened just after the BRICS summit; the latter which directly challenges the International Monetary Fund. IMF Director, Christine Lagarde had made a cryptic remark on the number 7 earlier this year.

«- Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | View All | Next -»

Related Post

CC BY 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

1 23 ... 5Next »