See “Huge wave of false flags to follow Paris, San Bernadino”, Dr. Kevin Barrett, Dec. 8, 2015
Such distractions will be necessary in part because the official stories of what happened in Paris and San Bernadino have been pronounced “dead on arrival” by alternative media exposés of countervailing evidence. As of today, two mutually-corroborating witnesses, Sally Abdelmageed and Juan Hernandez, have exposed three white paramilitary mercenaries – not a Muslim couple – as the real killers of San Bernadino. (video below)
Editor’s Note:
“Operation Stay Behind was a CIA terrorist operation aimed at the citizens and politicians of European countries and their democratically elected leaders (20). According to the 1976 Senate report on the CIA by the Church Committee, this program was first conceived by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff was staffed and funded by the CIA, and put into operation in 1948 by the National Security Council. Essentially, the CIA was using Nazis, Neo-Nazis, SS-offic-ers, and CIA-trained terrorists to indiscriminately murder European men, women and children, and to assassinate or otherwise remove or eliminate communist, socialist, and left-wing politicians. In Italy, this program was referred to as “Operation Gladio (which means “sword”). In Austria it was named “Schwert” (“sword”).
“In France it was called “Glaive” (“sword”). It was called “Operation Sheepskin” in Greece. “Sveaborg” in Sweden. In Belgium, Operation Stay Behind had the name: “SDR-8.” Likewise, in Switzerland it was given an alpha-numerical name: “P26.” Regardless of country, Operation Stay Behind was run by the CIA and British Intelligence under the umbrella of NATO, and involved the use of snipers, police officers, and para-military units to kill people at random and to conduct brutal raids on supermarkets, theaters, and other public places (21–28). In one series of attacks, in Brussels in the mid 1980′s, 28 people were murdered while shopping at local supermarkets. Again, the purpose of these attacks was to strengthen the hand of right-wing governments and to prevent left-wing governments or politicians from coming to power.”
Rhawn Joseph, Ph. D. America Betrayed
In the NATO False Flag Gladio operations in Europe (Operation Stay Behind) which this is a virtual reproduction of, the men in charge were Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Henry Kissinger, and George H.W. Bush. On Dec. 2, the day of the attack, Russia had just released irrefutable evidence implicating Dick Cheney, Rupert Murdoch, John McCain, and George H. W. Bush, and much of NATO in an illicit oil trade with ISIS via partnership with Turkey. The trade ties in with Israel/Genie Energy’s efforts to oust Assad for the oil discovered in the Golan Heights, but in the meantime they were already in business with Turkey for years. In terms of disclosure, it is the equivalent of declassifying everything known about 9/11 and the Kennedy Assassination, and then some as ISIS is a truly international threat. No matter what now, the white hats in our intelligence agencies, military, and law enforcement from every nation on earth will have all the teeth they need, hence the apparent panic that would prompt such an idiotic move.
The Why: Neocons Really, Really Need You to Fear Islam to Survive
Immediately before 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld announced the Federal Reserve was missing 2 trillion dollars. That money, according to several reliable intelligence sources, went into creating Bush’s private army, a sort of SS: Blackwater. As it was independent of any control by the US armed forces, it was designed to exert control over the country long after Bush and Cheney left office. It is already in the process of being de-funded and attacked, but attacking it openly would, it was feared, lead to civil war.
It is the Bush-Cheney protection arm, and one key reason he hasn’t been arrested. This is about to to change, but until then you may see a few more sloppy false flags to “vindicate” his position on Islam and the police state he hopes to put in place through the neocons in both parties. Those private armies, for examples, were being fed by proceeds from illegal ISIS oil trades coming in from Turkey, which was why the US armed forced were forbidden from attacking such a key economic and strategic target. You need to put this in perspective: armies not only need oil for money, if they control the wells, they also need oil (or fuel) to move.
On December 2, 2015, the day of the Riverside attack it was revealed that Turkey was a key part of the ISIS oil trade, and it immediately implicated people like Bush and Cheney. The tankers ISIS was using, for example, were coming from Houston. A major customer for that oil was Israel, for whom the neocons work with symbiotically. And of course, Bush is an oil family.
At present, the most vulnerable asset is Rupert Murdoch, and that hasn’t been lost on anyone.
From the Edward Snowden files: the NSA’s “Art of Deception” guide to deceiving and controlling the public through manipulation of the corporate media and social media. Note that false flags are now a US standard in the black ops playbook.
Here’s some other times the corporate media changed witness accounts to fit a cover story:
Suppressed to Peddle Lone Nut Theory, Distract Americans from Lyndon Johnson’s role in Assassination of President John F. Kennedy
Suppressed to Peddle Lone Nut Theory, Distract Americans from Lyndon Johnson’s role in Assassination of President John F. Kennedy
Suppressed to Peddle Lone Nut Theory, Distract Americans from Lyndon Johnson’s role in Assassination of President John F. Kennedy
San Bernadino shooters were three white men dressed in military attire
By Kevin Barrett on December 7, 2015
Official story is “dead on arrival”
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor, with Martin Hill
My frequent radio guest Martin Hill (listen to Friday’s interview) has discovered another bombshell that blows the official story of the San Bernadino shooting to smithereens. In his new post Martin writes:
“Witness Sally Abdelmageed, who works at the Inland Regional Center and witnessed the shooting in San Bernardino, was interviewed live via telephone by CBS Evening News the day the massacre happened.“The news anchor begins ‘She saw the attackers enter the building, and we spoke to her by phone.’
‘We saw three men dressed in military attire,’ she says. ‘I couldn’t see his face, he had a black hat on… black cargo pants on, the kind with zippers on the side… He had a huge assault rifle a lot of ammo…
She continues, ‘They opened up the door to building then he starts to, you know, shoot all over into the room – that’s the room we have conferences in…
‘I called 911 and I just hid under my desk..
‘As I was talking to the dispatch, we went into my manager’s office and locked the doors..’
‘Mrs. Abdelmageed, can you describe to me in as much details as you can what did the gunman look like?’ the CBS anchor asks.
‘I couldn’t see his face, he had a black hat on. All I could see was a black hat, black long-sleeved shirt… He had extra ammo. He was probably ready for something, to reload – I don’t know know…
‘I just saw three, dressed exactly the same. They looked like they were athletic build, and um, they appeared to be tall…’
‘You’re certain that you saw three men?’ the news anchor asks.
‘Yeah,’ she replies, as she continues to describe the THREE WHITE MEN, their muscular build, etc.
After she leaves the line, the anchor insists ‘and of course we’ve just learned that one of the suspects was actually a woman.’”
[Read Martin Hill’s full report, Witness to San Bernardino Massacre Describes Shooters As Three White Men “Dressed In Military Attire”]
Now don’t get me wrong, folks. I’m a white man myself. And I am proud, not ashamed, of my Irish-Welsh-Scottish-German ancestry. But I’m sick of seeing paramilitary-type white guys committing massacres designed to be blamed on brown-skinned Muslims.
The same thing happened in Paris on November 13th. The shooters at La Belle Equipe restaurant were not brown-skinned Muslims; they were “white, clean shaven…They looked like soldiers or mercenaries and carried the whole thing out like a military operation.”
The killers in the Charlie Hebdo offices last January were also white men with blue eyes – which rules out the brown-skinned brown-eyed patsies, the Kouachi brothers.
Likewise, the killers of French soldiers in the 2012 shootings falsely blamed on Mohammed Merah had tattoos worn only by white-power extremists, and therefore were almost certainly white paramilitaries employed by Operation Gladio B. (For details, read the chapter on the Merah case by Dr. Laurent Guyénot in We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11.)
Western governments and their lapdog corporate media, by refusing to investigate, discover and report the truth about these cases, are pumping out racist, Islamophobic hate propaganda in a manner that would shame Dr. Goebbels. That is the point I made in my latest Press TV interview:
The US media characterizes a shooting attack as “terrorism” only when there is indication that the perpetrator might be a Muslim but refuses to use the word in other cases, American scholar Dr. Kevin Barrett says.
On Wednesday, Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and Tashfeen Malik, 29, stormed a holiday party in San Bernardino, California, killing at least 14 people and injuring 21 in the deadliest mass shooting in the US in three years. Hours later, the couple died in a fire exchange with police. [According to dubious mainstream reports. -KB]
Only hours after news broke that suspects had Muslim names, American Muslims strongly condemned the incident, but this did not stop the US mainstream media from spewing hate and venom against Muslims and Islam.
Commenting to Press TV on Sunday, Dr. Barrett said, “We had another ‘mass shooting’ in the United States. This is nothing new; we had probably hundreds already in 2015.”
“But this one is getting worldwide headlines because the alleged perpetrators are supposedly ‘radical Muslims’, and that’s led to endless speculation among the media and politicians whether this is a case of ‘terrorism,’” he added.
“The word terrorism apparently means when anybody who is ostensibly Muslim conducts a shooting, and if anybody else does it’s not terrorism,” the editor of Veterans Today noted. “Well, the problem though is that as with so many other similar cases, it appears that the link between the allegedly Muslim perpetrators and terrorism may have been fabricated.”
Dr. Barrett said, “We have some huge questions being raised about what really happened in San Bernardino, and one of the people raising the questions is the lawyer of the family of the two alleged perpetrators.”
“This lawyer has questioned why the suspects were in handcuffs – they were dead in handcuffs. His name is David Chesley. And he should be commended. For once we have a lawyer for people who are being accused for this kind of crime who is actually standing up for his clients,” he added.
“And he has pointed out that the handcuffed bodies could be interpreted as evidence that the people were executed, which is what we have seen in many other similar cases where alleged terrorist suspects – who one would think would be captured and interrogated, you would think that they would stop at nothing to capture these people alive so that they can take down their alleged terror networks – and yet case after case, bin Laden’s supposed execution and throwing him in the ocean with no witnesses to all sorts of other cases where these terror suspects have just been hunted down and executed point-blank, the authorities really don’t act as if they are really trying to stop terrorism; instead they act like they are trying to silence patsies who know too much.
“And we have other indications that that’s what happened. The couple blamed for the San Bernardino shooting was apparently gunned down in cold blood in their car. The police claim that there was a gun battle initiated by the suspects, but the car windows were rolled up and then blown out. Nobody starts a gun battle by shooting through rolled-up car windows from inside of a car. It’s pretty much physically impossible, it wouldn’t work.
So it appears once again that these people may have just been gunned down and silenced.
“There are all sorts of other questions being raised about the shooting. The fact that the facility where the shooting happened, which is a handicapped facility – a very strange place for Muslims to attack! Why would radical Muslims be angry at handicapped people? I don’t know.”
San Bernadino shooting story shot full of holes by patsies’ attorney
Ten questions THEY don’t want you to ask
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
As CNN has reported, an attorney in the case has stated bluntly that the government’s account of what happened in San Bernadino “does not add up.”
One think we know for sure: The government is lying. So what really happened? Here are some obvious questions that the mainstream media is afraid to ask.
Since the windows of the couple’s SUV were found rolled up and blown out, how could the couple have initiated a gun battle with police through rolled-up windows? Nobody is going to fire assault weapons through rolled-up vehicle windows. The logical inference is that the police executed these people in cold blood. There was no “shootout.”
Both victims were found dead in handcuffs. Are we supposed to believe that they initiated a gun battle with police while wearing handcuffs and shooting through rolled-up windows?! It seems that the two patsies were handcuffed, set in place for execution according to a scripted plan, and summarily shot dead.
Consider the photo above. Why the handcuffs? This is a post arrest execution, a homicide, completely outside police and intelligence protocol. He was already subdued, so there is no possibility of questioning and obtaining critical information to prevent any future attacks if this was indeed a genuine terrorist cell. In fact, had this been handled as an actual terrorist threat, the officer who executed the handcuffed suspect could, at the very least, face charges of obstruction of justice for that very reason.
If the alleged shooters really “had contact with Syrian al Qaeda-affiliated group AND al Shabaab in Somalia” why wouldn’t the authorities make every effort to capture them alive so they could be interrogated, and their alleged terror network dismantled? This same question comes up every time the authorities summarily execute terror suspects and/or witnesses – Bin Laden, Mohamed Merah, the Charlie Hebdo patsies, Boston bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev and key witness Ibragim Todashev…
4. If the couple was really part of a terrorist network, would the FBI let the media ransack the crime scene?
5. If this supposed radical Muslim Bonnie-and-Clyde acted alone, who was the third gunman reported by multiple eyewitnesses?
6. Could the five foot tall, under-125-pound woman really have handled: A tactic vest • Body armor • Smith & Wesson M&P .223 Caliber Assault rifle • Magazine re-loading clips • Hand gun • Spare pipe bomb, detonator…and then tweeted her allegiance to Islamic State exactly one minute after the shooting began? “She posted a pledge of allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook while the shooting was happening, three U.S. officials familiar with the investigation told CNN.”
7. Why would Inland Regional Center conduct active shooter drills “every month or so” as reported by the Los Angeles Times?
8. Is it just a coincidence that the only center for disabled people in the world that conducts active shooter drills every month (I challenge readers to find another one) happened to be the place where either (a) a huge mass shooting just happened to erupt, or (b) a drill went live?
9. And if it’s just a coincidence, were the 46 drills of 9/11 also a coincidence, Peter Power’s terror drills on 7/7/2005 yet another coincidence, the Boston Marathon bomb drills one more coincidence, the multiple-location active shooter exercises in Paris on 11/13 just another coincidence…and to accept all this “coincidence,” do you have to be a batshit-crazy coincidence theorist?
10. If this were really “radical Islamic terrorism,” why would the perpetrators target a facility for disabled people, rather than high-level individuals who are responsible for the murder of more than a million Muslims since the 9/11/2001 neocon propaganda stunt?
If we ever hear: “This just in! Radical Muslim terrorists have slaughtered Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Dov Zakheim, and the other architects of the genocidal War on Islam in General and Palestine in Particular launched by the 9/11 inside job,” I just might believe it. Until that day, we are safe in assuming that the increasingly ridiculous stories of alleged radical Islamist attacks on random civilians that no Muslim would ever want to harm – like virtually all alleged Islamic terror plots since 9/11, according to Aaronson’s detailed investigation – are part of the same Gladio B program launched by the 9/11 neocon coup d’état.
(For more information on suspected false flag events, don’t miss the False Flag Islamophobia Conference simulcast live from Paris, France next Saturday, December 12th, noon to 4 pm Eastern Time.)
Be the first to comment