Predator’s stunt double, Whoopie Goldberg.

As a rule, stupid people think they are wiser than smart people and make a great show of it, via mockery or worse; so you have this  old proverb that goes “The idiot is always  the first to be heard.” The ignorant person believes if something is outside his skill set and perception of what is possible, then it cannot be done. Stupid always mocks genius because it doesn’t understand it. When stupid people are proven wrong, they don’t correct themselves, they continue, and pile on to their stupid adding to their failure a most unflattering display of vanity. Sometimes, because there are so many of them, they produce a television show and call it The View, and have Predator’s stunt double co-host it.

If you want to know why the lack of civil discourse exists the way it does today, consider this quote by Dostoyvesky:

“Above all, don’t lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others. And having no respect he ceases to love.”     

Fyodor Dostoyevsky,The Brothers Karamazov

Your author is not a genius, but could atone for my share of stupid as to how I ignored the red flags of a much better chess player; red flags like he always kicked my ass at it. After losing hundreds of games in a row and never winning I thought perchance my calling him a shitty player was premature.

Now I hate to break it to you, but we are brainwashed. All of us, some more than others, but to a very real extent all of us. So it is dangerous to judge the President without a careful, objective study of his history via media accounts or other sources before he ran for office, which tend to be the most objective.

A Presidential Daily Brief.

The surest proof of media brainwashing is thinking you are just as informed as the President of the United States without cabinet advisers or the Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) from all key intelligence agencies. No one in the press has access to this, so they are talking out of their ass. So what you get is the media circle jerk’s speculation bukkaki. Even former CIA and other intel officials don’t have it so they are clueless too, in regards to the SITREP, or military situation report.

It’s sad. Just sad. You’d almost think they had access to the same top secret information President Trump has to make an informed decision. They don’t, but even so, presume the authority and wisdom to cast judgment on matters they literally know nothing about, particularly in regards to national security and foreign affairs, the typical subjects within the PDB.

Their qualifications aside from watching cable news or echo chamber talk shows? Most impressive indeed! They’re celebrities and abortionists. Some even play super heroes, which means their movie powers transfer well into real life. Here is Mark Ruffalo, the guy who plays David Banner, the Hulk. You don’t want to make him angry. You wouldn’t like him when he’s angry.

Trump make Hulk angry! Hulk get mad! Hulk smash things! Hulk make picket sign and march in pussy hat! Argh!

POTUS’s uncle and MIT Professor of Engineering, John G. Trump, helped examine Nikola Tesla’s secret papers.

The 2nd surest proof of brainwashing is believing you are smarter than the President just because the media flatters you into believing it. But they’re really insulting your intelligence, and doing you a great disservice by such manipulative flattery. None of those teleprompter-reading motherfuckers in the Mockingbird press has a clue about the real world because they are literally forbidden to tell you about the real world. If they did, they would lose all their advertisers, and heads of state would roll 24/7.

So let us follow that logic that just because Richard Maddow says so, you are smarter than the President. So much smarter in fact, by virtue of watching this smug little Buddy Holly looking dude, that you even earned the right to make fun of the President.

Not that there is a lot of stock you can place in IQ tests, because you often see high IQ scores in unaccomplished people. That’s when it is passive. When applied, it often comes paired with great success.

Consider the skill set we need to be anywhere near Trump’s intelligence (estimated genius 156 IQ, believe it or not, with accomplishments and skill sets that actually support an applied, not passive, IQ):

  1. How many of us can say that we have, without ever having held any public office, ran for and won the presidency of the United States on our first try? None of us can, no one in history ever has done that.
  2. How many of us have made billions of dollars and fly around in our own private jets and helicopters?
  3. How many of us have starred in a top rated television show that was largely based on our reputation as a business savvy genius, like The Apprentice?
  4. How many of us can write best selling books?
  5. How many of us took down the Bush dynasty?
  6. How many of us took down the Clinton dynasty?
  7. How many of us have the power to affect the stock market with a single Tweet?
  8. How many of us can say we took on the fake news and exposed the CIA Mockingbird propaganda system designed to keep establishment politicians in power and promote illicit wars of aggression?
  9. How many of us come from a line of genius that worked with Nikola Tesla’s secret material and thus, even before running for office, had access to some of the most remarkable and secret information in the world? “A few days after Tesla died on January 8th, 1943, his possessions were seized by officials from the amazingly-named government Office of Alien Property. About 3 weeks after that, all of Tesla’s things and documents were given a thorough examination by a group of FBI agents that included none other than John G. Trump, the uncle of the current Republican candidate for U.S. President Donald J. Trump. Trump’s uncle was, by all accounts, a very accomplished and intelligent man, an M.I.T. Professor of Engineering, who helped design X-ray machines for cancer patients and did radar research work for the army during World War 2.”  Nikola Tesla’s Surprising Connection to Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, by Paul Ratner.

Here’s the FBI files on Tesla, by the way, in PDF.

  1. TESLA pages 1-249
  2. TESLA pages 250-290 
  3. Nikola Tesla Part 03 of 03

In terms of world history, President Trump has already outdone his quite remarkable uncle.

Ironically, NBC had aired decades of a man they supposedly knew to be racist, incompetent, and sexist. They should apologize as enablers since his show was on their network! Oh wait, that’s not true, is it? they only started saying that after he decided to run against Hillary, the candidate they bet the farm on. Before that everybody loved him, and everybody wanted his money.

Trump a racist? Looks like a lot of projection from the media.


President Donald Trump’s skill set seems pretty impressive to me, but if you believe the press, or some slack-jawed gossip-spewing plebeians like Whoopie Goldberg,  Joy Reid or Joy Behar, we all have it and more, and like them, just choose not to use it. We have gained this almighty wisdom by virtue of faithfully watching their shitty talk shows and cable news and listening to their pundits and “comedians.” Simple people mocking smart people as smart people keep winning seems kinda pathetic to me, but the way Kimmel, The View, Bill Maher and the rest of their ilk carry themselves, you’d think they had something to be proud of. It’s like the saying goes:

“Never play chess with a pigeon. The pigeon just knocks all the pieces over, shits all over the board. Then it struts around like it won.”

No one struts like Jimmy Kimmel. He seems to have won something.

What job requires a smarter person and the most demanding skill set, such as leadership, intelligence, literacy, persuasiveness, charisma, and courage? the Presidency or hosting a late night television show?

Who is the most  brainwashed of all, though? The mainstream media, of course. Consider, they were wrong on 9 out of 10 things regarding Trump, Russiagate, the economy. That’s worse than chance (50/50). If your respected panel of pundits are wrong 90 percent of the time or worse, it’s because they’re biased frauds and have lost any right to speak as an authority. Even so, their arrogance and certainty as they predict the President’s future like some Miss Cleo psychic rejects, after being so very, very wrong time and time again, is staggering.


In fact, watching the White House press pool is a sobering study in confirmation bias and political bigotry. Watch the way the reporters negatively frame the questions to sound like statements of fact, rather than sincere and objective inquiries into national policy.


The questions you ask say a lot about your character, or lack thereof. They also say a lot about your intelligence, or lack thereof. They say a lot about motive.

When you’re dating, for instance, you know the girl whose first questions are how much you make, your job title, etc. all bespeak a self-interested person who sees you as a means to an end. A girl who asks what you like to do, the foods and movies you like, what makes you happy; now that girl is a keeper. She asks those things because she likes you and wants to know how to keep you interested. Questions reveal a lot. The questions coming from this press pool reveal a disappointing lack of intellect and integrity. No one is there to report, only to spin a narrative to dehumanize the President at the expense of America’s being informed about the biggest issues shaping politics today. Observe the most self-infatuated reporter in the room, NBC’s Jim Acosta larvae, one Kristen Wanker or something.

Maddow’s blood libel against an entire people. Sad. Very, very sad. She reached her cross-eyed conclusion before Bob Mueller exonerated Trump, and before the facts were in she called for World War III. Not cool.

Perhaps it is the very thought that a member of one of the least respected professions in America proudly carries herself as a shimmering example of virtue and purity that irritates the most…. yet these are the people who tried to lure us into World War 3 with Russia, for over a year, because of a bogus dossier that framed Trump and was paid for by the Hillary campaign. This was a bogus dossier used as the basis for a warrant to spy on Trump.

Finally we get the Bob Mueller indictments. Trump is exonerated completely. Even Gen. Flynn is being urged to withdraw his plea of lying to the FBI, but tactic-wise, it wouldn’t give him the opportunity to demand discovery from the prosecution, and thereby expose the corruption on a national stage.

Amazingly, 13 Russians were indicted but among the charges were Russian attempts to undermine President Trump!

“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity,” Rosenstein said. “There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.”

There are a lot of evil bastards in that room, and you can usually spot them because their guilt for a career of bearing false witness creates leading questions seeking to justify their slanders and immoral behavior. It doesn’t matter how much they lie or how many times they’ve been caught, because it is a means to an end, and they seem to believe it is all justified since President Trump is, in their eyes, even more evil, inept and ignorant than themselves.

Let’s put this into context. Right now, there is sobering evidence that Obama used the FBI and DOJ to spy on the Trump campaign to the extent there are multiple House investigations and another by the Office of Inspector General to examine the weaponization of the intelligence agencies to undermine a presidential election and seat Hillary Clinton.

Some of the spook assets used in this plot were NOC press assets, and sitting in this room. (I’m looking at you Glenn Thrush.) But they’re going to waste this press conference on a domestic abuse case and will try to smear the President with guilt by association, because bless their hearts, they truly believe Americans see them as upstanding moral authorities rather than impediments to justice they are; miscreants who lust for war and civil unrest who turned journalism into a dark institution of organized slander.

Rachel Maddow is presently undergoing sexual reassignment surgery and transitioning into Buddy Holly.

If you look closely at the press pool, there is a contempt in their eyes like the President is a subhuman monster or idiot. I’ve never seen this kind of crass disrespect before, and it is clear the only reason they’re there is to spin a narrative. They’re asking the same stupid fucking question that is not journalism but a framing narrative. They’re like leading questions prohibited in court. As  Richard Nordquist writes, “A leading question is a type of question that implies or contains its own answer. By contrast, a neutral question is expressed in a way that doesn’t suggest its own answer.”

Rather than Sarah Huckabee Sanders answering a continuous stream of stupid questions, it would be interesting indeed if she questioned their motives and hearts. For example, from Feb 12, 2018:

Q Thanks, Sarah. Why haven’t we heard the President say exactly what you just said right there, that he takes domestic violence very seriously?

MS. SANDERS: I spoke with the President, and those are actually directly his words that he gave me.

Q But why hasn’t he said that? He had the opportunity. He’s, as you know, been active on Twitter.

He is the President, Cecilia, not your boyfriend. He doesn’t have to love you enough to know what you’re thinking.

Cecilia, the reporter, has offered a leading question. Her insinuation is that the President of the United States isn’t there to run this nation, but rather, to miraculously accommodate her unspoken expectations and become some form of hashtag social justice warrior to please her, which would be a dereliction of duty considering a president’s daily responsibilities. He is the President, Cecilia, not your boyfriend. He doesn’t have to love you enough to know what you’re thinking.

Jacqueline.

Q Sarah, I want to just go back to Cecilia’s point, which is that the President has a history of defending men who have been accused of sexual assault and harassment and abuse, including Mike Tyson, Bill O’Reilly, Steve Wynn, Corey Lewandowski, Roy Moore, and, now, Rob Porter. Would the White House like to say, today, unambiguously, that the President believes women making these accusations?

Here is Trump doing exactly that…


Sometimes I wish I was Ms. Sanders. I’d say “Yes, he believes them, 100%. Ask the women Bill Clinton is alleged to have raped or assaulted. Remember Juanita Broderick at the debate? But why would you ask such a thing, if not to indirectly impugn an after-the-fact, third party like President Trump? how does that make you a better, more moral, more informed person? Even if your false implication that President Trump likes wife beaters is true, is knowing you’re not the only piece of shit in the world some form of self-validation?  ‘I, too, am a piece of shit, and I am not alone?’

“Because the alternative narrative here is that you have never sinned, and therefore have the right to cast the first stone at the Commander in Chief. With all due respect, I’m inclined to believe, due to the evidence presented here today, that you also fall short as a human being, and had best put that stone down. Or better yet, give it to the person next to you, and have him beat you to death with it.”

MS. SANDERS: I think the President, like I said, above everything else, supports the victims of any type of domestic violence, but the President also supports due process. And I don’t have anything else further to add beyond that.

Q I just want to get back to the timeline, Sarah. So, the Intercept reporter, Ryan Grim, tweeted out photos of Colbie Holderness’s black eye at 1:53 a.m. on Wednesday. And The Daily Mail published them at 8:30 on Wednesday morning. Then the White House sent CBS’s statement at 1:45 on Wednesday afternoon, 12 hours after all of these photos were already published and out. Why was the White House still saying that Porter was a man of integrity and honor after these photos had circulated?

John Roberts reconstructs Trump’s timeline on the Porter story night before. Why didn’t he say something? why couldn’t the President read John’s mind and say and do exactly what he wanted him to? Is not the humble John the center of the universe?

“Are you, sir, a man of integrity and honor? If you were, you’d know the line of questions reveals a character that seeks to presume a moral authority over a third party you are trying to besmirch by association. In and of itself this lacks integrity and honor. It is all the more annoying because even if you could prove yourself to be a moral authority over President Trump, and by extension those who voted for him, it would be rooted in vanity and malice; both which are impossible to find in people with integrity and honor.

“You speak with the moral authority of a man whom has never sinned, good sir, but unlike President Trump, no one sees you as a role model. Now, John, you act like Trump directed Porter to beat his wife, which is the entire objective of this line of questioning, but is it flattering to you as a human being? A better question would be how is that question relevant to the nation in general? This is a clear political narrative that presumes your 1 in 7 billion perception of reality is shared by all Americans, and that is not the case. Roberts-vision is not a universal trait among humanity.

“Your perception of reality is truly unique to you. It is a series of predictions and expectations based on past experience, and consists of predictive processing based on a psychological database of your unique personal experiences. That means nobody really cares but you, because you haven’t gone out and found out what people care about before asking that question.

“From what I can tell, and correct me if I am wrong, this question is only important to you because it is part of a politically motivated narrative to dehumanize the president. However, most Americans don’t watch the press briefings to see who is likelier to go to heaven, you or President Trump.

“Half of America would appreciate a balanced view and honest reporting on issues affecting all Americans, and not the personal life of one of his former staff members. The latter is a narrative designed to distract from things you should be reporting on: an ongoing investigation of sedition and treason in our intelligence agencies, the DOJ, and the FBI.”

A framing narrative used by the DNC to spin Donald Trump. The establishment media is still relying on these tactics over a year after Trump became President. They are still “resisting” the will of the American voters,

White House Press Pool.

Let us assume they all succeeded today, and managed to falsely paint President Trump as an enabler of domestic violence. What would that accomplish? a pathetic sense of moral superiority? What good is that, knowing that at least some idiot in the White House press pool is “morally superior” to the POTUS? Would it get you closer to heaven, or make you a better, more informed person? would it put food on the table, a roof over your head, if you were to walk around town like these media clowns screaming “shame! shame! shame!”?

CNN’s wet dream.

This is why people hate the establishment press. They’re low IQ, low character dumb asses, but really believe they are superior human specimens worthy of casting judgment on their betters; and by betters I don’t mean high class human specimens, I mean stool specimens. They can’t even ask an original question, and latch on to the first stupid question lobbed out like it was a life preserver.

Let us examine one such authority, a Rhodes Scholar even:


This doesn’t mean the President is always right, or is an infallible god, or that we don’t have a right to challenge his policies or opinions; what it does mean is that we’re being manipulated against our best interests every time the media falsely implies we have better information at our disposal, through their out-of-the-loop reporting and outright lies, to make informed macro-economic/international decisions at the state level.

What it does mean is that the President of the United States earned his title and like any human being, deserves to be respected for his merits and gifts, and not dehumanized by minds poisoned with political bigotry. This is really an appeal to logic more than anything else. We need to show respect to get respect, and coming at the leader of the free world with such an ignorant and hateful attitude as the mainstream media wants to impress on us is the worst thing we can do to ourselves, and to our oft-maligned fellow citizens who rightfully exercised their elective franchise and voted for President Trump. Highly negative attitudes towards President Trump tend to color attitudes towards those who voted for him, and it’s time we call out those who wish to keep our house divided so long after the election with this so-called “resistance” based on a phony dossier.

CC BY 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.