Snowden NSA Docs, Slideshow PDF: The Art of Deception Training for a New Generation of Online Covert Operations. Associating whistle-blowers with kooks. How to control the masses with media and social media, attack informed dissent, political opposition.
Why is 9/11 such a powerful national trauma? You don’t have to connect too many dots to realize that Bush’s neocons violently overthrew our republic. Accepting the reality of a lawless regime change backed by the corporate media can give one a sense of helplessness. Still, you are anything but.
Why would Christian leaders be led, politically and spiritually, by people in Tel Aviv who don’t believe in Jesus? Even Muslims recognize Jesus as a prophet. These Christians are led even to the point of risking nuclear war! We are truly a nation in a trance state. Television programming isn’t just a schedule.
We go to college to learn the scientific method, to think objectively, and throw all that away when we turn on the television set and watch the news. The suspension of disbelief we have for drama shows or comedies seeps into the news broadcasts. The first thing you are hit with is “fear porn.” That is when you can’t watch a single broadcast on the news that doesn’t feature the word “terrorist.” They also make you angry. Sometimes I talk to conservative friends and they seem really upset, angry about the Russians, immigrants, people on welfare. “Liberals” are angry about abortion rights being diminished, gay marriage challenges, or whatever. The point is, they’re all mad. And they forget we’re all Americans. Nobody wants this division more than the establishment, because you’ll notice no one is then talking about Wall Street or bankers or the naked treason perpetrated by them or an unquestioning and complicit press.
Trauma-Based Exploitation, The Reality of Thought Control, The Stress Hormone Cortisol and Television
You may have already noticed that there are virtually no positive stories on the cable news. Perhaps the worst part of this all is that you are not only being deceived and manipulated to act against your interests, the cumulative effects of constant stress and anxiety from watching cable news actually exacerbates depression or despair in a nation struggling with economic recovery.
In the video at the beginning of this article wherein psychologists discuss 9/11 denial, one reports the spike in new clients and a return of old ones after the attack. (Slide 1).
Dr. J Clive Spiegel M.D., Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, notes that there is also a link between psychotic depression and excessive cortisol levels.
All of which is to say, the deliberate and systematic promulgation of stress-inducing terrorist “news” coverage and traumatic stimuli forcing Americans to re-live 9/11 can serve no other purpose than to increase cortisol levels and shatter the critical thinking needed to question authority, especially for those who do not question the mainstream media news.
Virtual Reality: Thought control is par for the course in the Western mediopoly. Because we have a media monopoly designed to replicate the function of a state-controlled totalitarian press, it is not difficult for the most intelligent among us to be deceived, and even controlled.
Why is 9/11 such a powerful national trauma? You don’t have to connect too many dots to realize that Bush’s neocons violently overthrew your republic. Accepting the reality of a lawless regime change backed by the corporate media can give one a sense of helplessness. Still, you are anything but.
The press was supposed to protect us, but instead it conducts smear campaigns on informed dissent. This is why the Bill of Rights has been so easily dismantled by men an illicit regime appointed to the Supreme Court. No judge who respected the law would do to our Constitution what Bush’s appointee’s have done: literally reverse, make from white to black, the stated meaning and intent of your basic rights, such as the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendment.
One of the hallmarks of PTSD is the tendency for one to avoid any reminders of trauma.
Knowing your country has been overthrown is pretty traumatic. We now live with uncertainty and anxiety. Those who only recognize it at the subconscious level will be highly vulnerable to manipulation. This is why the networks, particularly FOX News, the Bush Channel, are obsessed with presenting a cultural patsy, the Iranian, Russian or “Islamic terrorist threat.”
Because we do not want to remember that trauma, it is easy for the culpable to focus your attention elsewhere whenever someone brings it up and asks the hard questions.
Now, try to imagine that you had just come out of a cave somewhere and did not have to experience 13 years of propaganda. These facts, over which BBC is presently being sued by Matt Campbell, the brother a 9/11 victim exposing a cover-up, will be laid out before you:
1. Confirmed free fall of WTC Building 7
World Trade Centre Building 7 fell at free-fall acceleration for at least 2.25 seconds (105 feet/8 stories) as confirmed in 2008 by the official investigators NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). This means that at least 8 stories of the building collapsed with absolutely zero structural resistance within them, and that all 80 of the core steel columns, and all of the steel beam cross connections for those 8 stories had to have been completely severed, all within a split second of each other in order to achieve the perfectly symmetrical free fall collapse that is seen in WTC Building 7. The only thing that can achieve this is controlled-demolition using carefully placed explosives and perfectly timed detonation. Controlled Demolition of a high rise tower cannot be prepared within a few hours. It takes weeks or months to plan and implement.
UK’s mass surveillance program, according to MPs implicated in a child sex scandal, is essential for national security. It will be used, however, to hunt down keywords linking politicians and child abuse claims. It will be used to flag potential witnesses and leave them vulnerable to intimidation tactics or retribution. If British PM David Cameron already associates “Truthers” with terrorists, child abuse victims may face a similar fate. Please do not doubt this.
Apart from the three towers that collapsed on 9/11, no steel frame building has ever collapsed from fire in history, either before or since 9/11. High rise towers are designed specifically so that this cannot happen. However on that day the BBC reported on live television that WTC Building 7 had collapsed more than 20 minutes before it actually collapsed. While the buildings collapse was being reported to the world by a BBC journalist, the fully intact building could still be seen standing in the background in what appeared to be a relatively uncompromised state and no obvious fires of any consequence. This footage is still available to see on YouTube. This would suggest that someone likely knew that the building was going to come down in a controlled manner and that the BBC reporter had inadvertently been given this information a little too early.
How did anyone know that the building was going to collapse as a result of simple office fires, as is NIST’s official explanation, when fire has never caused this to happen to any other building in history, apart from on that day, and it is physically impossible for fires to reach even close to the required temperature to even begin to weaken steel? Why did the BBC not actively investigate where that foreknowledge of collapse came from and inform the police or investigators, and the public? How did the source of that information know that the building was going to come down if a symmetrical collapse at free fall acceleration is impossible from office fires and is unprecedented in history?
3. The BBC’s misinformation & refusal to notify the public about critical and incontrovertible evidence
In 2007 the BBC ran a documentary which claimed that despite what hundreds of professional engineers, physicists, demolition experts, and scientists were claiming about free fall of WTC Building 7, they were in fact wrong and there was no free fall of WTC Building 7. Even after NIST, the official investigators, officially confirmed the existence of free fall in 2008 the BBC has refused to comply with the requirements of their own Editorial Guidelines and publicly correct their error about this absolutely vital issue. This is despite a number of professional experts and more than 500 members of the public making written requests in 2012 to the BBC for them to do so. The BBC still has not corrected this error and still has not informed the public of the quite incredible fact that in 2008 NIST officially confirmed the existence of free fall of WTC Building 7, which can only occur through controlled demolition.
In addition to this, a great deal more incontrovertible evidence supporting the controlled demolition of the three towers has been forwarded to the BBC by numerous professional experts and hundreds of the public, but the BBC has refused to show this evidence to the public. This includes eye witness testimonies from 118 first responder fire fighters on 9/11 who reported hearing or seeing explosions going off in all three towers. These eye witness reports were originally suppressed by the US government, but were later forced to be released through the Freedom of Information Act.
4.BBC deliberately misleading the public with biased and inaccurate reporting
Despite having hundreds of people demanding that the BBC show the evidence described above, the BBC has refused to do this and have instead shown documentaries which are seemingly designed only to smear and discredit the reputation of the professional individuals and organisations bringing this evidence forward, and the BBC has instead presented information that is based on methodology that runs in direct contradiction to the BBC’s own Editorial Guidelines for providing accurate and impartial information. This has included such things as removing the sounds of huge explosions going off in WTC Building 7 moments before it collapsed during one of the BBC’s documentaries which was examining the claims of hundreds of professional experts that WTC Building 7 was brought down with explosives in a controlled demolition. Why would the BBC remove these sounds of explosions going off in a documentary aimed specifically at examining the claims that the collapse of the towers on 9/11 may have been due to explosives?
Deliberate Censoring and Editing of WTC Blasts Proves Media Complicity Before or After the Fact
England’s Prime Minister David Cameron recently announced that 9/11 “Truthers” were equivalent to terrorists, as dangerous as ISIS. Unfortunately for Cameron, he is on very thin ice and may himself be in violation of a new Anti-terrorism act:
He [Matt Campbell ] will also claim that the BBC is guilty of an offence under Section 38B of the Terrorism Act 2000 as amended by Section 117 of Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001. Under Section 38B(2) of the TA 2000 if a person without reasonable excuse, fails to disclose information falling within Section 38B(1). A person may commit this offence through total inactivity (by not answering police questions or by not volunteering information), through the partial suppression of information, or by relating a false account when the true facts are known.
So you are out of that cave and know only what you have read here. If it was any other country you might think, well, duh. It was a false flag. But, being an American, it’s not that easy, because suddenly you realize we have no media, no concerted effort by the the press, to call those responsible into account. Knowing your country has been overthrown is stressful, and pretty traumatic. Those who only recognize it at the subconscious level, as these types of realizations tend to be deeply suppressed, will be highly vulnerable to manipulation. This is why the networks, particularly FOX News, the Bush Channel, are obsessed with presenting a cultural patsy, the Iranian or “Islamic terrorist threat.”
The intensity of Cameron’s denial of an establishment role in the pedophilia scandal dissuades no one, it serves only to confirm it and incite a just suspicion of his personal involvement.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.