May 12, 2019
Mueller Mayhem Throws “Hillary Hell Bomb” Into US Federal Courts
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A thought-provoking new Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the recently released Mueller Report, which totally absolved President Donald Trump of the make believe charges brought against him comically claiming he conspired with Russia, or obstructed justice in defending himself against a crime that never happened, states that this over 400-pagesupposed legal document mocked by top White House attorney Emmet Flood as being “part truth commission report and part law school exam paper”, has now charted a mayhem (violent or damaging disorder; chaos) filled journey for itself on the road called “The Law Of Unintended Consequences”—where this more aptly named “Hillary Hell Bomb” is now exploding in US Federal Courts—the first being the US Federal Court hearing the case against Russian company Concord Management, whose lawyers warned the Mueller Report release violated court rules prohibiting lawyers in a case from making public comments that could reasonably “interfere with a fair trial or otherwise prejudice the due administration of justice”—and the second being the US Federal Court overseeing the case of former Trump advisor Roger Stone, whose lawyers have demanded the entire case be tossed out because the Mueller Report revealed that no evidence exists proving Russia hacked anything during the 2016 US Presidential Election. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, the entire Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 US Presidential Election is predicated on Russian intelligence having hacked the Democratic National Committee’s computers but the DNC wouldn’t let any outside parties examine their server—no proof of which any US intelligence agency has ever been able to show with, instead, the FBI accepting the word of CrowdStrike, a private contractor hired by the DNC, without any independent confirmation—which under US federal law is called “hearsay evidence”—that’s defined as an out-of-court statement, made in court, to prove the truth of the matter asserted, and is illegal to use.
The public evidence for the hacking of the DNC and Podesta computers to obtain their e-mails, this report details, originated with a Washington Post article published on 14 June 2016—that described how the DNC had noted unusual activity and hired an outside firm called CrowdStrike to analyze what was happening—with CrowdStrike then reporting that they “saw signs” of two known hacking groups tied to Russian intelligence—no proof or evidence of was ever obtained by the FBI, but that the Washington Post, on 28 June 2018, fantastically claimed wasn’t even needed because the FBI got a “fingerprint” instead—that they beyond belief, and tortuously, described as:
When investigators go to a crime scene, they use a technique to dust for fingerprints, which results in a reproduction of the contours of the tip of a suspect’s finger.
It’s that reproduction that is used to find a match against a database of fingerprints; FBI investigators don’t have to take the safe with them to constantly recheck the original print.
They use the copy.
That is essentially what the FBI did with the DNC server: The bureau was provided with copies of the data on the server, like duplicating your own hard drive.
Had Russians accessed the physical server after breaking into the DNC, the physical server itself might have been useful.
Instead, they were given the server’s fingerprint, so to speak.
This was confirmed by a spokesman for the DNC and by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony. “Best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves,” Comey said in March 2017, “but this — my folks tell me was an appropriate substitute.”
The Washington Post stating that the FBI using a “fingerprint” given to them by someone else in order to begin an investigation, this report explains, can more likely be compared to a criminal going to the FBI and giving them a “fingerprint” of an innocent person to keep themselves from being prosecuted—something which no sane policing agency in the entire world would ever think of doing—except, that is, for former disgraced FBI Director James Comey who said “my folks tell me was an appropriate substitute”—and who obviously could never even imagine that Hillary Clinton, or her Democrat Party, would ever want to frame Donald Trump.
Fortunately for those American people not submitting to the leftist propaganda and outright lies being spread by the likes of the Washington Post, this report continues, they’ve had as one of their most valuable resources the anonymous journalist and computer aficionado who goes by the pseudonym “Adam Carter”—that Russian intelligence more correctly notes is not a person, but an NSA operation—and who has spent the last couple of years cataloging evidence that CrowdStrike engaged in a disinformation campaign, inventing not just a fake Russian hack but also a fake hacker called “Guccifer 2.0”—all of which is devastatingly documented in the astonishing, and massive, computer forensic report on CrowdStrike titled “Guccifer 2.0: Game Over”.
As this “Hillary Hell Bomb” keeps exploding in these US Federal Courts sifting through the rubble of the Mueller Report, this report concludes, left unknown at this time is how exactly the US Federal Judges overseeing the Concord Management and Roger Stone cases are going to deal with this mayhem—as the one overseeing the Concord Management now has to deal with Mueller having already declared them guilty before the trial to prove their guilt has even taken place—and the one overseeing Roger Stone now has to give him evidence the FBI admits it never had—both of whose momentous issues stare straight into the very heart of the entire American legal system whose over two-centuries of precedents and legal rulings stand on the unshakable foundation principals that no defendant can be declared guilty of any crime unless a jury of their peers rules so after a fair and impartial trial—and every defendant has the absolute right to see the direct evidence against them, not “hearsay evidence”—and whose rulings on will, in effect, either show the United States is still ruled by laws, or by Hillary Clinton and her ilk.
May 12, 2019 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being’s right to know the truth. Due to our mission’s conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]