Exclusive Previews

Exclusive Preview: The DaVinci Code Sequel

"Your book's precious conjecture that Jesus had children with Mary, who then moved to France and thus became a royal blood lineage... What better way to perpetuate the unworthy kingdoms of inbreds than to fool the world into believing the royal families of Europe are direct descendants of Jesus of Nazareth?"

Exclusive Excerpts from upcoming sequel, The Mystery of the Holy Grail, the Holy Salad Tongs, the Holy Gravyboat and the Holy Pepper Grinder

The Holy Grail. It was the cup Christ used at the Last Supper. But some biblical scholars now believe the mystery of the Holy Grail cannot be solved without the three missing utensils that made this Last Supper complete: the Holy Salad Tongs, the Holy Gravyboat, and the Holy Pepper Grinder. It was all hidden from Unworthy Man for thousands of years, until now...

SYNOPSIS: The Holy Salad Tongs are a code concealed for centuries by a lineage of Druid and apostate Templar masons hungry to discredit Judaism and Christianity. Among them is a powerful alien publisher, The Reptilian, who hypes Brown Daniels, a mediocre writer that shares his anti-Semitic and anti-Christian beliefs. Daniels is a neo-Wiccan Amway salesman whom argues Judaism and Christianity are based on a massive fraud as described by Jesus' talking salad tongs. His findings conclude that the key to translating the mystery of the Holy Salad Tongs is an anagram in the label of the long missing Holy Pepper Grinder and the Holy Gravyboat. Though Daniels is thought clinically insane, the Reptilian uses his findings to divert the masses from the real secret of his dark order: that Jesus and Moses were linked to alien awareness and visitations from the beginning.

"Is Heaven not space? Verily, this is the Great Secret of Illuminist masons since Adam Weishaupt- that the devil, like God, is an extraterrestrial."

Worse, Daniels had incorrectly translated the "code", which was not even a code but read, in plain English:

"In the beginning, men were seeded on earth by God. God and Lucifer represent opposing factions of extraterrestrial life, but Lucifer was cast down and bound to earth. Is Heaven not space? Verily, this is the Great Secret of Illuminist masons since Adam Weishaupt- that the devil, like God, is an extraterrestrial. Though now earthbound and subterranean, these extraterrestrial 'demonic' entities control most of mankind through technological superiority and knowledge of highly advanced biology and poly-dimensional physics which men doth perceive as magic. Thus Lucifer and his angels were the gods of the Egyptians, and of Illuminist masons who began as astrologers but soon fell to worshipping the same Fallen Angel of countless names; this as attempts were made to resurrect the extraterrestrial 'magic' and glory of ancient Egypt. Behold, this is why masonic symbolism is awash in Egyptian mysticism as thou mayest find on the American dollar bill. Verily, at the highest level, unbeknownst to new initiates and lower ranking masons below the 30th degree, these gods are aliens, they are right under our noses.

But the Almighty God of Adam, Abraham and Moses didst show mercy unto man, and Jesus' crucifixion marked the sealing of a prophecy of man's redemption that doomed the alien and dragon Lucifer, and those who had allied themselves to him. For behold, Jesus himself claimed he was an ET, as a Son of God, who is in heaven. Those who have ears to hear, and eyes to see...let them hear, and let them see."

This was not good enough for Daniels. Convinced it was a code based on a sliding cipher, he partially- and erroneously- translated it thus...

"In the beginning, there was the spoon and fork. God showed mercy unto men, and that men may drink not from a bowl, didst bring unto men the Holy Grail and Holy Shot Glass, that beverages may be sipped therefrom, and God saw that it was good. And God saw the table needed more utensils, for the garden salad was not easy to toss, and behold, he did create for man the salad tongs. And these Holy Salad tongs did speak unto men and shew many miracles, and they brought forth the Holy Pepper Grinder and the Holy Gravy Boat that it may not be alone on the supper table."

Herein is the first chapter, the first in a series of installments...

Chapter 1

"I'm a Tool!"

"Tonight the rightful guardians will be restored. Tell me where it is hidden, and you will live." The strange albino man leveled his gun at the kneeling curator's head. "Is it a secret you will die for?"

Pike could not breathe. The gunman was wearing J Lo perfume, its fumes pungent enough to permeate the clothes of those around him. Damn him! thought his hapless victim. I'm gonna die smelling like ass and Puff Daddy.

"Your brethren have something that does not belong to you. Tell me where it is!"

"Never! I will die first!" Pike grumbled defiantly.

"Tell me and you may live! Tell me!"

"I don't know! I swear, and if I did know, I wouldn't tell you that I know!"

"Tell me! And what did you and your brethren do with my Vagisil?"

Continued

Actual Cancellation Call to AOL. (MP3) Think it's a risk free trial? Listen to what happens when a trial member tries to cancel.

Actual Cancellation Call to AOL. (RM)

What AOL doesn't tell you about the "Risk Free Trial

You are not billed after 90 days. You are billed immediately after joining. Only if you cancel before 90 days will that money be refunded.
Creating an account for someone other than yourself requires only one person, but to cancel the same account requires at least two: yourself and the member you created it for.
If the person you created the account for is dead, you must fill out a form and return it to AOL before cancellation can be processed.
If the person you created it for is not dead and unavailable to provide consent, the only option you have is to cancel the card and call your bank or credit card company to block recurring payments to AOL.

AOL Demands Consent from the Dead to Cancel

It's your card, your credit, but you can't cancel an AOL account you make for others, even if the member is dead, A taped phone cancellation proves it...

Not too long ago, I had been researching an AOL fraud allegation regarding the impossibility of canceling an AOL account you create for a friend or family member. One member spoke of an attempt to cancel the account of a relative that had just passed away, an account he had charged on his card as a gift. Now that she was deceased, the account wasn't needed anymore, so he called AOL and asked them to cancel the account. The AOL rep said it was impossible, because even though he was paying for the account and it was charged in his name, his aunt's name was on the account, and she had to be consulted before the cancellation could be processed. He was told AOL would send him a form to fill out within seven days, and that after that, the cancellation would be processed. He never heard from AOL again.

Surely no company could be so stupid as to pull a stunt like this, I thought. No company could be so fucking blockheaded as to pull a stunt like this as they were losing more members than they could sign up. Boy was I wrong.

Incredulous at my friend's experience with AOL, I decided to try it myself. I got a 90 day "risk free trial account" for a fictional sister. I charged it to my card. And then I tried to cancel. It was impossible, just as he said.

Because this seems so preposterous, and since AOL records conversations between members and customer reps, I taped the call I made to cancel the account. For those of you who are familiar with AOL, the infuriating stalling tactics and deception won't be too surprising. But for everyone else, I can safely say you will find the tape as clear-cut evidence of fraud and illegal business practices exceeding those reported to the FTC in March of 2005. (See Complaints Mount Over AOL Cancellations, KRON Television, March 29, 2005). If you want to see just how low AOL has stooped to in their attempts to stem the flow of cancellations, an actual recording of the phone call may best illustrate the hassles members endure when trying to leave AOL.

Actual Cancellation Call to AOL. (MP3) Think it's a risk free trial? Listen to what happens when a trial member tries to cancel.

They're Still At It, and it's Gotten Worse

"AOL's free trial period is a negative option deal. If you don't cancel, you're signed up for a monthly fee. The ads say 'simply cancel.' That's not what these people say. They're just a few of the consumers complaining to us. That they too expected free. But now can't get AOL off their backs. In fact, Laura Fremont with the Federal Trade Commission says right now, the FTC is monitoring the company. "

KRON TV Report- "Complaints Mount Over AOL Cancellations"

If you were suckered into an AOL account via the "90 day risk free trial", it is very likely that you will be charged after cancellation if you choose to pay by credit card or debit card. You are not billed after 90 days. You are billed immediately after joining. Only if you cancel before 90 days will that money be refunded. Creating an account for someone other than yourself requires only one person, but to cancel the same account requires at least two: yourself and the member you created it for. If the person you created the account for is dead, you must fill out a form and return it to AOL before cancellation can be processed. If the person you created it for is not dead and unavailable to provide consent, the only option you have is to cancel the card and call your bank or credit card company to block recurring payments to AOL.

AOL Billing Terms

"To continue my AOL membership, I am confirming my choice of payment method. By typing "I Agree" in the box below, I am also providing my signature to authorize America Online to automatically deduct from my bank account ending in XXXX the AOL membership fee of $25.90 billed per month plus the $5.00 handling fee (applicable after the initial FREE trial and the introductory rates) and all usage fees that I , or other authorized users, incur with respect to my AOL account. I understand that debits from my account may vary from month to month. I further agree I will only receive notices related to debits from my bank account electronically at my AOL account e-mail address. To revoke my authorization for automatic debit or my consent to receive notices by e-mail, I acknowledge that I must contact AOL at 1-888-265-8003, in which case , I may be asked to provide an alternate billing method. If I cancel my AOL account or my AOL account is terminated, I hereby authorize AOL to deduct from my bank account all fees I incur through the date of my cancellation or termination. I will print and save this page and any further notices for my records. I can call AOL Member Services with any questions regarding my account 24 hours a day, seven days a week."

There is no mention herein of any requirement for anyone other than the cardholder to authorize the cancellation of an account. As you can see from tape of the cancellation attempt, AOL does not mention that creating an account for someone other than yourself requires only one person, but to cancel the same account requires at least two: yourself and the member you created it for.

Throughout the call, you heard the phrase "for your security and privacy" when the customer rep explained the need for a deceased member to consent to the cancellation of an account you created, and are paying for. The claim it is being done for our "security and privacy" is not only untrue it is insulting. If anything, the requirement to obtain consent from those who aren't paying for the service exposes the cardholder to the possibility of more theft and fraud than ever. For example, if an account is made without permission of the cardholder, the hacker enjoying the account must still consent to the cancellation!

WHAT TO DO:

Call your bank or credit card company, order a stop payment
Make sure there are no recurring payments to AOL
Notify the FTC's Laura Fremont or Linda K. Badger: Better yet, try the media contact listed below...

FTC CONTACT INFO: Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20580

MEDIA CONTACT: Claudia Bourne Farrell
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2181

STAFF CONTACT: Linda K. Badger
Western Region - San Francisco
415-848-5151

Laura Fremont
Western Region - San Francisco
415-848-5193

Come November, guess who'll pay a price for listening to this neo-segregationist lodge tard?

"The Republican Party also was not faring well: 35 percent of those surveyed said they were happy with the job the party was doing running Congress. Fifty-five percent of registered voters planned to vote for the Democratic candidate in November midterm elections."
Washington Post/ABC Poll April 11, 2006

My Friend Pedro

When not stealing coveted jobs from Americans, like this one, Pedro here doesn't miss a chance to fly to Washington and earmark money for campaign contributors, draining the federal treasury of $50 billion a year for what is ultimately personal use of public funds to maintain a seat in high office. Oh, wait, that wasn't Pedro. Pedro can't vote or run for office. That was Congressman Tom and his ilk, in both parties.

Price-gouging and Hurricane Katrina

The farcical hearings and "grilling" of oil executives on charges of price-gouging during a national emergency were the most obscene form of grandstanding possible. Yet Sen. Tad Stevens (R) actually had the nerve to accuse proponents of grandstanding when they asked the execs be sworn in; because if they weren't, the whole point of grilling the oil executives on price-gouging was negated. Stevens, the head of the Senate Commerce Committee, had rejected calls by senators to abide by standard protocol and have the executives sworn in. It was obvious that without an oath, no perjury charges could be leveled after the oil execs lied to Congress, which was expected. Stevens must have known this, as he went out of his way to protect witnesses from any legal consequences of such deception. And so the big oil execs lied at the mock hearings, and lied with child-like abandon, and if you believe they did otherwise, you will believe Pedro is responsible for the rise in the price of gasoline, global warming, and crop circles.

Big Oil's Faithful Bitch

Sen. Tad Stevens of Alaska. In 2005, his state of some 663,661 people was appropriated $325 million in pork. That made an average of $489.87 in earmarking per capita, over sixteen times the national state average of $30.55 per person.

This Summer, it's Not Pedro Who will Raise the Price of Gas...

Surely, most US voters can look at Pedro and realize he isn't planning to raise the price of gasoline this summer to boost election year coffers for GOP candidates in November. Voters know it's big oil and their puppets on the Hill, and the higher the price of gas, the more determined voters will be to oust incumbents.

McMinutemen

Congressman Tom's vision of a brand new America: low skill labor market as the new career standard for high school and college graduates.

Meet Tom Tardcredo, a rather ambitious little bigot from Colorado with surprisingly transparent ties to white supremacist militia groups and ideology. He's a joke, sure, but is now an increasingly unfunny joke to the GOP he belongs to.

Soon, we'll discuss how and why his little state alone has taken on an economic behemoth, California, that is the world's fifth largest economy. We'll discuss the purchasing power of a group he has set his myopic sights on: attacking a Latino purchasing power that nationally, will top $1.08 trillion by 2010, up 413 percent from 1990, according to a report by the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the University of Georgia.

The fatal counter-strike? the inevitable boycott.

Immediately feeling the backlash, the businesses boycotted by Tom's race baiting will not be pleased when he and his ilk come around asking for campaign donations. They will carry this contempt to the party that embraces him, that gave him a platform. And so, come November, the Democrats will quite possibly take the House and/or Senate as well, with one insipid, angry little apron-boy lodge turd from Colorado undoing all the work President Bush and Ken Mehlman had accomplished in wooing Hispanics to the party.

Early polls point to this. According to a Washington Post/ABC Poll April 11, 2006, the Republican Party is not faring well: 35 percent of those surveyed said they were happy with the job the party was doing running Congress. Fifty-five percent of registered voters planned to vote for the Democratic candidate in November midterm elections. In other words, the race baiting didn't help, it backfired, Hispanic GOP voters that accounted for recent gains in GOP numbers were alienated, and many will now gravitate towards the opposing party.

All in all, most US voters could look at an immigrant and realize "hey, this guy didn't send my boy to Iraq and wipe out my life-savings, it was Congress and the spawn of Ken Lay." Surely, most US voters can look at an immigrant picking lettuce in the field and realize he isn't planning to raise the price of gasoline this summer to boost election year coffers for GOP candidates. Voters know its big oil and their puppets in the party, and the higher the price of gas, the more determined voters will be to oust the incumbents allied with them.

Ironically, in a an attempt to boost popularity, the House GOP decided that going draconian on the immigrant bashing bandwagon would help their cause. It hasn't. Proof of it is the fact they lost even more support afterwards, and moreover, lost support to a party that favors an opposing stance on immigration. What does that tell you? it tells you that the immigrant bashing failed, that it divided, not united white Americans and that as a platform, immigration will cost the GOP dearly because it is no secret it is sheer race politics.

The logic you'll hear from Tom's unabashedly racist ilk is absurd from the get-go. If the undocumented immigrant is indeed an overall detriment to a state's economy, it follows that the state with the most undocumented immigrants would have the worst economy. But the opposite is true. California's economy is not only the most powerful in America, tax revenue from this state alone is the lifeblood of the American economy. Indeed, one out of every eight Americans lives in California.

The fall in public support tells you that whatever the GOP has to offer now is not enough to keep a majority. You can't blame the immigrant for the war, or the price of gasoline. You can't blame the immigrant for the Enrons of the world, the corporate corruption and CEOs who got rich off of outsourcing US jobs and downsizing- firing American workers to earn their record salaries and the golden parachutes they'll use when they are caught embezzling from the company, and resign.

Most important of all, you can't blame the undocumented immigrant for earmarking billions in deficit spending (i.e., spending more tax dollars than we take in); that's something only Congress can do, and it does it with abandon. All deficits must be repaid, and to repay them, taxes must be raised proportionately. There is even an economic term for this: Ricardian Equivalence. It's just a matter of tax now, or tax later, and of course, we're in the "tax later" option. But we will see higher taxes in the future, it's inevitable, and it's likely the average American will get the brunt of it. This leads us to...

The Biggest Drain on the US Economy: Earmarking, AKA Congressional Pork Barrel Spending in the Midst of Budget Deficits

"Mr. President, according to information compiled from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the total number of earmarks has grown from 4,126 in fiscal year 1994 to 14,040 in fiscal year 2004. That’s an increase of 240 percent. In terms of dollars, the earmarking has gone from $26.6 billion to $47.9 billion over the same period. The practice of earmarking funds in appropriations bills has simply lurched out of control."

Sen. John McCain

It is often said what we hate most in others we find in ourselves. The demagogues of both parties, though long at the public trough, will attempt to cite a spurious or outright fallacious "immigrant drain on public resources gambit" to justify the racial polarization and attacks on the undocumented that they use to divert attention from their own draining of the treasury via pork barrel politics, their record or matters of pressing national concern, be it the war or health care. That there is a drain on the system is true. That it is a drain easy to pinpoint and verify is also true. But the true culprit here is the politician, and no one else. You can blame the immigrant all you want, but the appropriations bill doesn't lie: anyone who wants to look can see the billions drained from the federal treasury irrefutably went to please campaign contributor interests or local projects completely unrelated to the budget in question; that earmarked money for campaign contributors or local interests drain the federal treasury of almost 50 billion a year for what is ultimately personal use of public funds to maintain a seat in high office.

The demagogue in either political party will conveniently ignore the fact they are individually and collectively- penny for penny- the biggest drain on public resources in the history of the United States. Earmarking, at bottom, is the completely unregulated spending of federal tax dollars to get re-elected, and pork barrel politics has been around since 1817. Seeing that this drain on the treasury is too obvious to conceal, those guiltiest of appealing to it often need a convenient scapegoat, and immigrants are a perennial favorite. In the 19th century Irish Catholics and Chinese immigrants bore the brunt of Congress' "immigrant drain on public resources gambit", by the 20th century Italian immigrants got the lash, and now its South American immigrants. Earmarking, naturally, has been around all that time; and so has Congress' need for a scapegoat.

Let's take a closer look the state which received the most earmarked dollars in 2005, Alaska, where some 663,661 people were appropriated $325 million in pork. That made an average of $489.87 in earmarking per capita, over sixteen times the national average of $30.55 per person, this at the behest of Sen. Tad Stevens (R) Alaska.

At the end of the price-gouging born of the Katrina disaster , Exxon earned more than $36 billion in 2005, the biggest profit ever for a U.S. company. Other oil companies also boasted record earnings on the backs of Hurricane Katrina victims particularly, but also the nation as a whole. It wasn't Pedro who argued against putting these big oil executives under oath in Senate hearings, it was the GOP. These farcical proceedings gave oil execs the right to utter bold face lies to Congress regarding price-gouging and record profits after Katrina. Of course they denied any gouging took place knowing they couldn't be prosecuted for it, but eventually, as it became clear they had lied to Congress, it was too late to do anything about it. The GOP leaders who argued against putting them under oath knew this perfectly well, and are hoping you're too stupid to realize have a hearing without an oath is a trial without a judge, jury, or crime.

The farcical hearings were the most obscene form of grandstanding possible. Yet Sen. Tad Stevens (R) actually had the nerve to accuse proponents of grandstanding when they asked the execs be sworn in, because if they weren't, the whole point of grilling the oil executives on price-gouging was negated.

Stevens, head of the Senate Commerce Committee, thus rejected calls by senators to have the executives sworn in. Without an oath, no perjury charges could be applied after the execs lied to Congress, which was expected. Stevens knew that is exactly what they planned to do- lie and lie with puerile abandon, and if you believe otherwise, you will believe Pedro is responsible for the rise in the price of gasoline, global warming, and crop circles.

So Stevens and his ilk weren't just draining the federal treasury for pet projects that benefited big oil, they were giving big oil the right to price-gouge consumers in the face of a national emergency. As more and more Americans realized the extent of the corruption, the party demagogues were called in to make a smoke screen, and from their trusty stage props they culled an old favorite: Pedro the illegal alien.

Say You, Say Me

We can only blame ourselves in the end, for voting carelessly. We can, and should blame ourselves for casting a vote for amoral politicians so contemptuous of your intelligence they would have you believe the undocumented worker picking lettuce in the field outsourced your job; that the undocumented worker doing your yard work wiped out your life savings by protecting the Ken Lays and Enrons of the world. Now, it was our vote, as citizens, that put the puppets of these corporate criminals in office. Our vote. It was OUR vote, not some alien selling roses on the freeway, who put men in office that will take money from CEOs who downsize companies and move them abroad, in essence, it is our vote that directly influences the very existence of our jobs. Unless you work at McDonalds or picking berries for the minimum wage or less, an undocumented worker isn't about to steal your job.

But maybe you do want a career at McDonalds, or a job picking lettuce. If so, you're in luck, we may soon have a lot of openings.

Citizens Against Government Waste
The clever GOP strategy for defeat in November Wall Street Journal, April 13, 2006

CENSORED! The Brady Bunch You Never Saw

Click image to hear an Evil Brady rehearsal, with the censored part at the end of the song. Listen at your own peril.

The Brady Bunch You Never Saw

The following is a partial list of controversial and therefore abandoned episodes from the has-been television sit-com, The Brady Bunch. The list was compiled by NBC censors in the1970s before they mercifully canned the stupid-ass kiddie show...

February 19, 1973

"The Brady Six Six Six"

(partially censored, but aired)

The Brady family makes a pact with the devil. In exchange for their souls, the Brady family's hitherto hopeless band, The Brady Six, will become world famous. Davey Jones makes a special appearance as Satan. An excerpt:

The contract signed in blood, Satan squats suddenly, and defecates on the living room floor.

JAN

What are you doing?

SATAN

Do not question me. This works every time. Quickly now, get me some staff paper.

When she returns, Satan dips the point of his tail in the watery excrement and uses it to pen the music and lyrics of a song. Greg walks to a piano he couldn't play just minutes earlier. Greg's eyes roll up to their whites, suddenly he is in a demonic trance. He takes the sheet music and plays effortlessly. Satan begins to sing.

INT. KITCHEN- DAY

Alice is cooking dinner and overhears the music. She covers her ears, each verse immediately driving her deeper and deeper into an abyss of incurable insanity.

SATAN (O.S.)

I think I'll go for a walk outside now,
The summer sun's calling my name, I hear it now.
I just can't stay inside all day,
I've got to get out, gimme some of those rays.

Everybody's smiling (sunshine day),
Everybody's laughing (sunshine day),
Everybody seems so happy today in the sunshine day.

Oooh. Can't you dig the sunshine?
Feel the sun and the rays.
Can't you hear it calling your name?

EXT. DRIVEWAY BRADY RESIDENCE- DAY

Carol and Mike Brady arrive, the station wagon pulling up in the driveway. Their arms are loaded with groceries. She and Mike Brady are strangely immune to the evil sway of the music, and in fact, like it.

CAROL

What delightful music! Why, this morning none of them could read or write music!

MIKE

Catchy! Yes, I do believe the Brady Six have something going there!

CAROL

(as Mike opens the sliding glass door)

Alice, can you help me with the groceries please? Alice? Oh my God-- no Alice, no!

Carol and Mike find Alice standing on a chair, a noose around her neck.

ALICE

Don't try and stop me Mrs. Brady!.... can't you... can't you hear the sunshine calling your name?

Alice kicks the chair from under feet.

February 19, 1976

Mr. Brady’s Best Friend- Batteries Not Included

(censored, not aired)

Mr. Brady has some explaining to do when Bobby finds a vibrator and dildo in his father’s brief case while searching for cocaine money. Non-stop laughter when an unwitting Bobby takes the device to school the next day for Show and Tell, claiming it is one of his father’s favorite architect tools.

The boy no sooner mounts the strap-on and whips out his dad's blueprint for a new apartment complex before he is expelled by his humorless teacher, and is the butt of every joke to be told by the children for the rest of the semester. A script excerpt:

BOBBY

And this is my dad's favorite architect tool. I think he uses it to hold the blueprints to the table while he examines them, but I must admit it might be hard to see anything with these on.

Bobby mounts a strap-on dildo to his head, the rubber penis facing forward. His eyes are obscured by two large rubber testicles. The room bursts into laughter. Bobby has no idea what they find so funny.

Continued

EXCLUSIVE: In His Own Words- the L. Ron Hubbard Tapes

Notes on Impious Videos 1 and 2, In His Own Words: The L. Ron Hubbard Tapes: Herein, Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard addresses members on the great mysteries of high level Scientology.

The L. Ron Hubbard Tapes In His Own Words, L. Ron Hubbard and the OT III Secrets. Audio tapes of L. Ron Hubbard addressing Scientologists on the great mysteries of high level Scientology (COMPLETE VERSION)

"I watched my father doing something to my mother. She was lying on the bed and he was sitting on her, facing her feet. He had a coat hanger in his hand. There was blood all over the place."

L. Ron Hubbard, Jr., son of the late Scientology founder (below)

The L. Ron Hubbard Tapes

In His Own Words, L. Ron Hubbard and the OT III Secrets. Audio tapes of L. Ron Hubbard addressing Scientologists on the great mysteries of high level Scientology.

L. Ron Hubabrd encourages Scientologists to read Satanist Aleister Crowley Click for for comments by Scientology founder regarding "very good friend'' and Satanist Aleister Crowley.

Is Tom Cruise attempting a Hubbard Moon Child?

Mission Impossible star Cruise vows to eat placenta after birth The Daily Mirror April 16, 2006

"The best blood is of the moon, monthly: then the fresh blood of a child, or dropping from the host of heaven: then of enemies; then of the priest or of the worshippers: last of some beast, no matter what."

The Book of the Law, Aleister Crowley

Scientology and the Occult

"He [L. Ron Hubbard] got hold of the book by Alistair Crowley called The Book of the Law. He was very interested in...the creation of what some people call the Moon Child. It was basically an attempt to create an immaculate conception --except by Satan rather than by God. Another important idea was the creation of what they call embryo implants --of getting a satanic or demonic spirit to inhabit the body of a fetus. This would come about as a result of black-magic rituals, which included the use of hypnosis, drugs, and other dangerous and destructive practices. One of the important things was to destroy the evidence if you failed at this immaculate conception. That's how my father became obsessed with abortions."

L. Ron Hubbard, Jr., son of the late Scientology founder.

As Tom Cruise praises L. Ron Hubbard's credentials as the paragon of good parenting, even going to the extremes of hyping Hubbard's "Bradley Method" of "silent-birth" rituals, it''s a pity he has ignored or is completely ignorant of the one authority on the matter: L. Ron Hubbard, Jr., the son of the late founder whom has since changed his name to Ron DeWolf to distance himself from the notoriety inherent in the Hubbard name.

What does L. Ron Hubbard's own son have to say about his father?

"I have a memory of this that goes back to when I was six years old. It is certainly a problem for my father and for Scientology that I remember this. It was around 1939, 1940, that I watched my father doing something to my mother. She was lying on the bed and he was sitting on her, facing her feet. He had a coat hanger in his hand. There was blood all over the place. I remember my father shouting at me. ''Go back to bed!'' A little while later a doctor came and took her off to the hospital."

L. Ron Hubbard Jr., aka Ron DeWolf

An excerpt from the 1983 Penthouse interview:

Hubbard: According to him and my mother, he tried to do it with me. I was born at six and a half months and weighed two pounds, two ounces. I mean, I wasn’t born: this is what came out as a result of their attempt to abort me. It happened during a night of partying , he got involved in trying to do a black-magic number. Also, I’ve got to complete this by saying that he thought of himself as the
Beast 666 incarnate.

Penthouse: The devil?

Hubbard: Yes. The Antichrist. Alistair Crowley thought of himself as such. And when Crowley died in 1947, my father then decided that he should wear the cloak of the beast and become the most powerful being in the universe.

Penthouse: You were sixteen years old at that time. What did you believe in?

Hubbard: I believed in Satanism. There was no other religion in the house! Scientology and black magic. What a lot of people don’t realize is that Scientology is black magic that is just spread out over a long time period. To perform black magic generally takes a few hours or, at most, a few weeks. But in Scientology it’s stretched out over a lifetime, and so you don’t see it. Black magic is the inner core of Scientology, and it is probably the only part of Scientology that really works. Also, you’ve got to realize that my father did not worship Satan. He thought he was Satan. He was one with Satan. He had a direct pipeline of communication and power with him. My father wouldn’t have worshiped anything. I mean, when you think you’re the most powerful being in the universe, you have no respect for anything, let alone worship.

Penthouse: Let’s get back to how you saw Scientology working on an individual basis. What if someone wrote to your father asking if he could cure their cancer?

Hubbard: He’d say, Oh, yes, he could handle that.

Penthouse: And what would be the charge for curing cancer?

Hubbard: Back in those days it was anywhere from $10 to $25 an hour. Now, it’s up to $300 or more an hour.

"What a lot of people don’t realize is that Scientology is black magic that is just spread out over a long time period. To perform black magic generally takes a few hours or, at most, a few weeks. But in Scientology it’s stretched out over a lifetime, and so you don’t see it. Black magic is the inner core of Scientology, and it is probably the only part of Scientology that really works. Also, you’ve got to realize that my father did not worship Satan. He thought he was Satan."

L. Ron Hubbard, Jr., son of the late Scientology founder

Hubbard and Crowley

SCIENTOLOGY: Revealed for the first time; The odd beginning of Ron Hubbard''s career

The Sunday Times 5 October 1969 Spectrum

L. Ron Hubabrd encourages Scientologists to read Aleister Crowley Click for for comments by Scientology founder regarding friend and Satanist Aleister Crowley.

Make sure to read the complete Penthouse interview of L. Ron Hubbard, Jr., son of Scientology founder.

The News-Herald , Son of Scientology, by Dennis Wheeler
The Clearwater Affidavit

The Garrison Rebuttal to NBC

On July 15, 1967, Garrison was granted thirty minutes of national television time to respond to an NBC documentary which was highly critical of his investigation. Here is his complete address to the nation in which he outlined his allegations...

NBC vs. America: The Network Slander of Jim Garrison

The Garrison Rebuttal to NBC

Everyone who has followed the various investigations of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy is aware of the attempts of New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison to prove a conspiracy. Jim Garrison’s story has now been produced as a major motion picture by Oliver Stone, titled: “JFK.” Here’s a little of the actual source material from New Orleans District Attorney Records. Every word included here is verbatim, and has appeared in complete form no where else. This is the original version of Jim Garrison’s theory regarding the assassination of President Kennedy.

David Stager, February 13, 1992.

"They do not tell you that Lee Harvey Oswald’s fingerprints were not found on the gun which was supposed to have killed the President. And they do not tell you that nitrate tests exonerated Lee Oswald from the actual shooting by showing that he had not fired a rifle that day. And they do not tell you that it was virtually impossible for Oswald to have taken his fingerprints off the gun, hidden the gun, and gone down four flights of stairs by the time he was seen on the second floor."

ANNOUNCER:

The following time period has been made available to District Attorney Jim Garrison of New Orleans to reply to an NBC news program broadcast on June 19. [1967] In that program NBC News examined some of the methods used by Mr. Garrison in his investigation of what he charges was a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy. Except for the opening and closing announcements, this program has been prepared under Mr. Garrison’s sole supervision. Mr. Garrison.

JIM GARRISON:

Tonight I am going to talk to you about truths and about fairy tales; about justice and about injustice.

In the months to follow you are going to learn that many of the things which some of the major news agencies have been telling you are untrue.

You are going to learn that although you are citizens of the United States, information concerning the cause of the death of your President has been withheld from you.

In the months to come you will learn to your own satisfaction that President Kennedy was not killed by a lone assassin. You will learn that there has been and continues to be a concerted effort to keep you from learning these facts. And you will learn, I assure you, that what I have been trying to tell you and what I am telling you tonight is true.

As children we become accustomed to hearing fairy tales. They are always pleasant stories and they are comforting to hear because good always triumphs over evil. At least this is the way it is in fairy tales.

Fairy tales are not dangerous for our children and are probably even good for them up to a point. However, in the real world in which you and I must live, fairy tales are dangerous. They are dangerous because they are untrue. Anything which is untrue is dangerous.

And it is all the more dangerous when a fairy tale becomes accepted as reality simply because it has an official seal of approval, or because honorable men announce that you must believe it or because powerful elements of the press tell you that the fairy tale is true.

The conclusion of the Warren Report, that President Kennedy was killed by a lone assassin, is a fairy tale. This does not mean that the men on the Warren Commission were aware at the time, that their conclusion was totally untrue, nor does it mean necessarily that these men had any sinister motives. It does mean that the conclusion that no conspiracy existed, and that Lee Oswald was the lone assassin is a fiction, and a myth, and that it should be brought to an end.

The people of this country don’t have to be protected from the truth. This country was not built on the idea that a handful of nobles, whether located in our Federal agencies in Washington D.C., or in the news agencies in New York should decide what was good for the people to know, and what they should not know. This is a totalitarian concept which presumes that the leaders of our Federal government and the men in control of the powerful press media constitute a special elite which by virtue of their nobility and their brilliance, empower them to think for the people. Personally, I would rather put my confidence in the common sense of the people of this country.

The truth about the assassination of the President has been concealed from you long enough. Those forces which are fighting so hard today to tell you that they have examined the Warren Report and that everything is fine, and that our investigation has uncovered nothing, are not merely going to lose this fight—they have already lost it.

Now let me tell you why President Kennedy was murdered, and how he was murdered. I also want to give you a few examples, which will show you how the conclusion reached by the Warren Commission is totally impossible.

Continued

Revelation, Freemasonry and 666- the Number of the Beast

The mark of the Beast is clearly already here, in your pocket. It remains one of the most closely guarded, yet obvious secrets of freemasonry.

"And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together..."

"And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places. And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains; And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?" Rev 6:13-17

Monty Python Masonic Spoof A classic take on the kind of sheeple who join Masonic societies.

The Book of Revelation and 20th Century History A more serious look at the price of subservience to freemasonry.

13 Sobering Parallels to Freemasonry

Mr. Crowley Ozzy Osbourne's hymn to Aleister Crowley, one of the greatest rock hits of the 80's.

Note the verse beginning "Conceived in the eye of a secret..." as an obvious reference to Crowley's beginnings in masonic occultism. Aleister Crowley, a 33rd degree mason in the Scottish Rite, with the Egyptian Eye of Horus on his ceremonial garb. Crowley was known for signing all of his correspondence with the number f the beast, or 666. His followers were and are many, particularly in freemasonry, as Crowley claimed to have channeled the demon Baphomet when he wrote the B ook of the Law, which includes notable excerpts such as the following:

"Let Mary inviolate be torn upon wheels: for her sake let all chaste women be utterly despised among you!" III; 55

"Sacrifice cattle, little and big: after a child." III; 12

"The best blood is of the moon, monthly: then the fresh blood of a child...then of enemies; then of the priest or of the worshippers..." III, 24

"With my Hawk's head I peck at the eyes of Jesus as he hangs upon the cross." III; 51

Albert Pike: Dual Worship of God and Lucifer "Eternal Law"

Anton Chaitkin, The Scottish Rite's KKK Project: "In France in 1889, Pike said:

'That which we must say to the crowd is, we worship a God, but it is the God one adores without superstition.... The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay (the God of the Christians) whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion to science, would Adonay and his priests calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also God...' This quote, by the way, is available in French and English in the Albert Pike vertical file at the library of the Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction at 1733 16th St. NW, Washington DC."

"For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary for light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive."

Pike's half-baked excuse for his embrace of devil worship ignores the obvious: this balance also applies to cause and effect. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. For all concerted darkness, concerted light will arise, and it isn't always simultaneous opposition, it is often both linear and simultaneous. No lie can live forever, and neither can the one that claims the Lord delights in the dual worship of God and Lucifer.

Secular Priesthoods

Scottish Rite Temple Headquarters, Washington DC. At right, a bust of Albert Pike. It's here he lies entombed in a place of great honor, despite the fact he created the KKK and Luciferian ritual of the burning cross. Both Democrats (e.g. Klansman Sen. Robert Byrd) and Republicans are members, which insures cooperation in preventing a three party system to challenge their secret, unaccountable establishment of religion.

The SS Version

"Their hierarchical organization and the initiation through symbolic rites, that is to say without bothering the brains but by working on the imagination through magic and the symbols of a cult - all this is the dangerous element and the element I have taken over. Don't you see that our party must be of this character?...An Order, that is what it has to be - an Order, the hierarchical Order of a secular priesthood."

Adolf Hitler, Mein Kempf, discussing freemasonry in the Nazi Party

Wewelsburg castle, SS Chief Heinrich Himmler's occult headquarters. Once the conquered eastern territory had been carved into an SS state, SS leader Heinrich Himmler intended the castle of Wewelsburg to serve as a burial crypt for Hitler, as is the Scottish Rite's Temple Headquarters in Washington DC. The latter is the crypt of Confederate Gen. Albert Pike. Himmler also was to appoint himself Thule Grand Master.

The Trent Affair: War with England over Two Masons?

LEFT to RIGHT: James M. Mason, John Slidell, Scottish Rite ambassadors for the Confederacy captured by the Union Navy off of Cuba on Nov. 8, 1861. On their account alone, Britain threatened war with the Union unless they were released from capture. It was an early humiliation for the Lincoln administration, and the incident became widely known as the Trent Affair. With British-owned Canada in the North, the Confederacy in the South and English ships coming in from the east, Britain threatened a three front war. BELOW: Harpers Weekly illustration; Captain Charles Wilkes

Wilkes' account (Click image for full inventory.)

Union Account of the Boarding of the Trent

Still at the height of power, pro-slavery factions in England and America hoped to use this incident as a pretext to side with the Confederacy for a three front war. John Slidell, freed through British intervention, would later be implicated as a key conspirator in the Lincoln assassination before fleeing to Europe. Tory sympathizers like the Scottish Rite in 1801 began efforts to return the colonies to English control which soon manifested in the War of 1812 and later, the Civil War. In the Civil War, Britain was not neutral, it was a key supplier of arms whom flaunted the arms embargo imposed by Union ships upon the Confederacy.

Everywhere you turn, a common misconception of religious scholars is that Revelation pertains to our future, as opposed to John's future. Rarely, if ever, is it assumed that some of those prophecies have already taken place. RFID tags, bar codes, are all mentioned as possible marks of the beast's future manifestation, for instance, but the fact is the mark of the Beast is clearly already here. It remains one of the most closely guarded, yet obvious secrets of freemasonry. It was placed on our currency in 1933, the same year Hitler became leader of Germany. It was placed there by closet Luciferians in the Scottish Rite for the express purpose of fulfilling prophecy and to honor anti-Christian forebears dating back to the Sanhedrin. It was a mark placed there by men who were instrumental in starting two world wars on a scale consistent with John's prophecy. It was a mark placed there by men who believe in magic and blood rituals, men who truly believe in Albert Pike's "eternal law" that the dual worship of good and evil gods brings "balance" to the universe, and as such, embraced a and protected a brotherhood of Satanists to the point of giving anti-Christian mystics like Aleister Crowley or Albert Pike their highest honors (in fact, Pike, a Confederate general, is entombed at the SR Temple Headquarters in Washington DC.)

The Book of Revelation is a book about world wars, and the end of the world. In WWII, the means to end our world through nuclear annihilation became reality, and as such, Revelation now has special relevance.

Freemasons, Not Jews, Wrote The Protocols of Zion

All Jews are not freemasons, anymore than all gentiles are all freemasons. No anti-Semite can call himself a Christian, because Jesus was a Jew, and he taught Jewish law. And no one faithful to the God of Abraham, and the law of Moses could have written the blasphemous impieties in the protocols. Obviously, this is by no means an endorsement of the idea that Jews wrote them. It would be like saying the disciples of Jesus were Klansmen.

What is certain, however, is that high level freemasons in the largest, oldest and most subversive international cabal of the time, the Illuminati, actually wrote it and it is evident by the writings of Adam Weishaupt and other leaders, particularly Scottish rite Sovereign Grand Commander and Tennessee Chief Klan Judicial Officer Albert Pike.

In Revelation, Jesus spoke of a "synagogue of Satan". They were those apostates of the true Jewish faith, much like the Klan, which calls itself Christian.

Revelation 2:9 "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. "

In WWII, the high priests of these "synagogues of Satan" managed to bring the Jews to near annihilation. This international, self-styled Sanhedrin is also known as the Illuminati, and by representing themselves as true Jews, these imposters were the half-truth that Hitler used to turn the world against all Jews, and thereby launch the Holocaust. Walter Rathenau, a Jewish banker behind the Kaiser, writing in the German Wiener Freie Presse, December 24, 1912, said:

"Three hundred men, each of who knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successor from their entourage."

Later in 1931 Jean Izoulet, a prominent member of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universelle, wrote in Paris, La Capitale des Religions:

"The meaning of the history of the last century is that today 300 Jewish financiers, all Masters of Lodges, rule the world."

Of the so-called Jews in the Illuminist cabal, one thing is certain: true Jews faithful to the God of Abraham they are not. They may as well be camp guards. This "synagogue of Satan" consists of false Jews, atheists, adherents to the priests of Egyptian "magick" or just Mammon...bound by such a common hatred of Christianity they are willing to to forge alliances with the modern-day priests of Molech and Baal in hopes of destroying the faith.

This is why it's important people read The Protocols of Zion, particularly people of Jewish faith. Jews have a right to know what crimes have been done in their name by apostates and admitted Luciferians, because this slander by association has already proven quite deadly. Victor E. Marsden writes:

"The Protocols of the Learned Elders of ZION may be briefly described as a blueprint for the domination of the world by a secret brotherhood. Whatever may be the truth about their authorship - and, as will be shown, this has been the subject of bitter dispute - there can be no doubt that the world society to which they look forward is nothing more or less that a world police state. The book is which the Protocols were first embodied was published by Professor Sergyei A. Nilus in Russia in 1905, a copy being received in the British Museum on August 10th, 1906, Professor Nilus's concern was to expose that he believed to be a ruthless, cold-blooded conspiracy for the destruction of Christian CIVILIZATION."

Is it anti-Semitic? It is actually a handful of corrupt and powerful people, under the color of Judaic authority; falsely claiming to represent them that is truly anti-Semitic. It is the equivalent of a small cabal of apostate Jews using a nation of honest Jews as human shields to avoid enemy bombings. Of course, it is a tactic that never works. If the crimes of the cabal are grievous enough, the human shields will be attacked unless those shields eliminate the cabal that's willfully putting them all in peril. It is up to true Jews to deal firmly and permanently with the apostate faction, lest their trespasses destroy good and bad alike. There is a serious precedent, this is not to be taken lightly.

The Holocaust is what happened when this cabal of apostates was allowed to act in the name of their nation. The first to fall were the honest Jews, but the ones who used them as humans shields simply fled Europe. These were the same Illuminist cabal of bankers and industrialists who actually supported Hitler. In the 1930s, Cyrus Adler, president of the American Jewish Committee, coordinated with the family’s B’nai B’rith, and the family’s paper, the New York Times, to crush all U.S. political action against Adolf Hitler in Germany. The B’nai B’rith was the one Jewish organization that Hitler deliberately left open and functioning under Nazi rule from 1933 on. In 1939, Britain made a dramatic change in its policy toward Hitler, this after teaching Hitler his race theories, after forcefully backing his takeover of Germany, after financing and equipping his armies, Britain now changed publicly to opposing Hitler. Only at that point, in 1939, about a year after Hitler finally closed B’nai B’rith’s Nazi-authorized German operations, B’nai B’rith decided to "approve" an international boycott against the Nazi regime....

The protocols, above all else, are anti-Christian. An example:

"We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of the goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. Freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere, so that now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion, as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress."

Protocol 17

Most people who call it anti-Semitic have never read it. That's not to say Jews shouldn't be offended by it, however, It is to say it is both anti-Semitic and anti-Christian, and upon reading it, you will realize the serfs and slaves in the protocols will consist of non-masonic Gentiles and Jews alike. The basic premise of the protocols is that the end justifies the means.

"Our countersign is -- Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty."

Protocol 1

Those that have read it, and still call it anti-Semitic, are usually masons- Gentile or Jewish. This is ironic, because the book deals largely with- and exposes the threat of- blind subservience to freemasonry itself.

"Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery."

Protocol 4

"But if there should arise in its midst a plot, then at the head of that plot will be no other than one of our most trusted servants."

Here you see one more reason to avoid membership in such Masonic lodges. The protocol continues:

"It is natural that we and no other should lead Masonic activities, for we know whither we are leading, we know the final goal of every form of activity whereas the goyim have knowledge of nothing, not even of the immediate effect of action. . . The goyim enter the lodges out of curiosity or in the hope by their means to get a nibble at the public pie, and some of them in order to obtain a hearing before the public for their impracticable and groundless fantasies: they thirst for the emotion of success and applause, of which we are remarkably generous. And the reason why we give them this success is to make use of the high conceit of themselves to which it gives birth, for that insensibly disposes them to assimilate our suggestions without being on their guard against them. . . We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of collectivism. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality. If we have been able to bring them to such a pitch of stupid blindness is it not a proof, and an amazingly clear proof, of the degree to which the mind of the goyim is undeveloped in comparison with our mind? This it is, mainly, which guarantees our success."

The Protocols of Zion, published in 1905, outlines a plan for universal war that parallels the universal wars plotted by Illuminist Luciferian Albert Pike and anarchist Giuseppe Mazzini, who planned for three.

"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war. The principal factor of success in the political is the secrecy of its undertakings: the word should not agree with the deeds of the diplomat. We must compel the governments of the goyim to take action in the direction favored by our widely-conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation, by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly prompted by us through the means of that so-called "Great Power" -- the Press, which, with a few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands. In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments of the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with the guns of America or China or Japan."

Protocol 7

Continued

Old Testament Mysteries: Predicting the Life and Death of Jesus

The Occult History of the Third Reich (1999)