Does every moment in time create its own "frequency" on the
planet's electromagnetic grid, and if so, what does this mean to
science and our knowledge of history and ultimate truth?
Is time travel theoretically possible through the
manipulation of this grid?
Nikola Tesla's concept of
free energy for all via the use of electromagnetic energy in
the atmosphere; i.e, electricity which is generated by the
earth's rotation. (This is the same rotation that is responsible
for hurricanes.)
Why
LBJ killed Kennedy The only
mystery in the Kennedy assassination is why Johnson or
Arlen Specter were never indicted for it. How
Mac Wallace's fingerprint connects Johnson directly to the
assassination. See why both parties gain from obstructing
justice, and why the man second only to Johnson in
orchestrating the deception is now Chairman of Senate Judiciary
Committee that oversees the nominations of our Supreme Court
judges. Main site here:
It Was
Johnson
"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress...who,
having previously taken an oath...to support the Constitution of the
United States, engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or
given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof..."
Ratified in 1868,
this amendment specifically targeted the
KKK. Designed to negate the
influence of oath-bound
"ex-Klansmen" in high office, this amendment was crudely violated
when FDR appointed Klansmen Hugo Black into Supreme Court.
Others would follow.
"That
murder has been committed, is now acknowledged
by all. That it has been so committed, and the
malefactors have acted under such authority, as to
carry the guilt of treason, cannot be doubted.
Protection
from these crimes, is the first duty of government, and the object for which
it is invested with its highest powers. But protection cannot be
secured, by the ordinary means. Shall it therefore be abandoned?
Shall we forego, in behalf of' freemasonry, or through fear of it, the
primary purpose of civil organization?"
Lately, if
they're not defending child molesters in
NAMBLA,
the ACLU is gutting the 14th amendment by defending the
Klan's "right" to serve in high office... In doing so,
they have defended the Klan's use of judicial and
legislative authority to quietly suppress the rights of
racial or religious "undesirables".
"But to
simulate and wish to lie hid; to bind men like slaves in the very tightest
bonds, and without giving any sufficient reason; to make use of men enslaved
to the will of another for any arbitrary act; to arm men's right hands for
bloodshed after securing impunity for the crime-- all this is an enormity
from which nature recoils.... For, from what We have above
most clearly shown, that which is their ultimate purpose forces itself into
view-- namely, the utter overthrow of that whole religious and political
order of the world which the Christian teaching has produced, and the
substitution of a new state of things in accordance with their ideas, of
which the foundations and laws shall be drawn from mere naturalism."
"It is with this object in view that we are
constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these
theories..... Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty
words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism,
Nietzscheism...."
Because some of the framers of the constitution were
freemasons, there are those who believe the Constitution itself is designed
expressly for an establishment such as freemasonry but in fact, the contrary
is true. There is no mention of special rights or exemptions granted the
mason over an American citizen in the US Constitution. There is no mention
of freemasonry unless we're talking about establishments of religion, and
here the Constitution stands firmly opposed.
To believe the Constitution was designed for the express
purpose of Masonic rule is folly. It is to believe that the highest law of
the land is designed to be subservient to the law of the lodge, yet not say
so.
Indeed, if this were so, why wasn't this caveat written into
the Constitution by the masons who helped write it? Why? Because these
framers knew our nation needed an ultimate authority that could not rest
inside a lodge or temple, for these are by nature factional and secret. Some
Tory
lodges, for instance, were pro-British, and others were not. If they
could not agree on allegiance to the Crown, how could they agree to a
Constitution which Tories treated as an act of treason in the first place?
These framers, mason and non-mason alike, knew we needed a
Supreme Law of the Land, one which applied to all citizens, lodges or
temples.
In contrast, a legitimate Masonic government would require a
critical exemption from the Constitution's legal authority to be written
into the document itself, and this exemption would have to denote the
difference between the "profane" non-masons and "the Brotherhood" to justify
Masonic rule superseding the Constitution's.
Robert Mills, who designed the Washington
Monument, was a freemason. The obelisk design was an
obvious allusion to Egyptian mysticism. Obelisks
were a prominent part of the architecture of the
ancient
Egyptians, who placed them in pairs at the
entrance of temples, much like the columns of Jachim
and Boaz in Masonic temples. Obelisks were also
common in Babylon, such as the one seen here, the
Black Obelisk of
Shalmaneser III.
George Washington did not approve of this
monument. It celebrated a secret society he,
like many before and since, disowned before
his death.
Because
some of the framers of the constitution were
freemasons, there are those who believe the
Constitution itself is designed expressly for an
establishment such as freemasonry but in fact, the
contrary is true. To believe the Constitution was
designed for the express purpose of Masonic rule is
folly. It is to believe that the highest law of the
land is designed to be subservient to the law of the
lodge, yet not say so.
Indeed,
if this were so, why wasn't this caveat written into
the Constitution by the masons who helped write it?
Why? Because these framers knew our nation needed an
ultimate authority that could not rest inside a
lodge or temple, for these are by nature factional
and secret. Some
lodges were pro-British, and
others were not. If they could not agree on
allegiance to the Crown, how could they agree to a
Constitution which Tories treated as an act of
treason in the first place?
"At their annual
meeting last June in Indianapolis, the Baptists also
adopted a resolution against secret societies, which
reads in part: 'we ... call upon all Christians to ...
[avoid] any association which conflicts with clear
Biblical ... teachings concerning the taking of oaths,
the secrecy of activities, mystical knowledge, or racial
discrimination'....Dr. James Holly of Beaumont, Texas,
told me this [the Lutheran ban on joining freemasonry]
was aimed at the known fact that
white Freemasonry is
affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan..."
The ACLU Loves the Klan,
Hates the Cross Unless it's Burning
Defending terrorist
"rights" or politicians unlawfully in office seems petty
when the ACLU can go after the real threat to Americans:
a tiny cross on a county seal inoffensive to anyone but
the most zealous and thorough anti-Christian bigot. In
2004, in Los Angles, the ACLU successfully fought to
remove the tiny cross on the seal of Los Angeles County
because, as Ramona Ripston argued, the symbol "might
offend some". However, in 1977 offending some was hardly
a concern of the ACLU. They successfully
fought to allow the Klan
and Aryan Nation to march through Skokie, Illinois, a
town largely inhabited by Jewish Holocaust survivors.
If the belief that we are not alone in the universe, and may
have originated by reason other than chance; if that is a threat to
separation of church and state, what then, is the idea of "magic" that
governs the very same Masonic judges who ridicule the Christian faith?
Freemasons believe in magic and a God, and actually practice magical
ceremonies at the highest degrees. In doing so, they have appealed to the
"supernatural", and hence, have no claim to the scientific method they cite
in ridiculing the "supernatural" element of the Christian faith.
"...Pike
and the Scottish Rite borrowed a good deal of numerology and other
superstition from the Jewish cabala, a neo-pagan tradition in direct
opposition to the Mosaic law underlying the Jewish religion.
... In Pike’s book, Morals and Dogma, the Scottish Rite’s main guide to
the universe, he explains his method: ' ... those who accept
magic as a rule may give their will a sovereign power that will make
them the masters of all inferior beings and of all errant spirits; that
is to say, will make them the Arbiters and Kings of the World....'
Pike wrote this particular section to instruct "Sublime Princes of the
Royal Secret" gentlemen of the 32nd Degree, such as was Bill Clinton’s
preacher..."
When the cabala, or Kabbalah, the "magic" of freemasonry's
most revered leader, Scottish Rite Sovereign Grand Commander
Albert Pike,
is one and the same as that practiced by the Sanhedrin that crucified
Jesus...we see the true face of religious intolerance and its obvious aim to
single out and destroy a particular faith: Christianity. What is the face of
this intolerance? It should be familiar. It is the face of Caiaphas
incarnate, the High Priest at the head of a hierarchy of secular priesthoods
in the religion of freemasonry. As Chaitkin noted, it is also the face of
Luciferianism: Albert Pike put it best....
"That
which we must say to the crowd is, we worship a God, but it is the God
one adores without superstition....
The Masonic
religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees,
maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not
God, would Adonay (the God of the Christians) whose deeds prove his
cruelty, perfidy and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion to science,
would Adonay and his priests calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and
unfortunately Adonay is also God..." This quote, by the way, is
available in French and English in the Albert Pike vertical file at the
library of the Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction at 1733 16th St. NW,
Washington D.C. "
Have you ever wondered why the ACLU has
never fought for the interests of the American public when it came to
obvious government cover-ups like those seen in the
Kennedy and
King
assassinations? or Waco? the
Oklahoma
City Bombing? the
Atlanta Child Murders? the cover-up of the
TWA Flight 800 downing, etc? Well, there is a reason, and it's a simple
one: they're a
fox in the
henhouse.
The ACLU: Representing the SR's Secular Sanhedrin
since the Kennedy Assassination
Let's have a look at what they have fought for and the
battles will speak for themselves. Today both Catholic and Protestants are
united in their condemnation of freemasonry, and for the mason the enemy has
now become Christianity as a whole. Anton Chaitkin, in
The
Scottish Rite's KKK Project, writes:
"The influence of Scottish
Rite-dominated Freemasonry is shockingly pervasive in American government
and culture, particularly in the South. But it has come under attack from
some surprising quarters. The Southern Baptist Convention recently voted to
conduct an investigation of Freemasonry in all forms, and to prepare a
report on whether Masonry is compatible with Christianity. The Southern
Baptist Convention, predominantly white, is the largest U.S. Protestant
denomination, with 18 million church- goers. Freemasons make up a sizable
proportion of this church’s male membership, perhaps 20 percent. So this is
a dramatic, emotional issue, a strongly factional issue within Protestant
Christianity.
"At their annual meeting last June in Indianapolis, the
Baptists also adopted a resolution against secret societies, which reads in
part: 'we ... call upon all Christians to ... [avoid] any association which
conflicts with clear Biblical ... teachings concerning the taking of oaths,
the secrecy of activities, mystical knowledge, or racial
discrimination...."'
"A leader of this initiative, Dr. James Holly of
Beaumont, Texas, told me this was aimed at the known fact that white
Freemasonry is affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan. The 2.5 million member
Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod says in its official Handbook: "The Synod has
declared itself firmly opposed to all societies, lodges and organizations of
an un-Christian or anti-Christian character."
In fact, the KKK does allude to the All-Seeing Eye of
Masonry,
(Eye
of Horus)- that became the Grand Cyclops. There were hand signals,
secret passwords, secret handgrips and recognition signals, and even a
sacred oath all adopted from Masonic experience. However, the Templar
influence is also in the extreme left: the ACLU itself is largely Scottish
Rite. It shouldn't surprise you: one of the main agendas of this cabal is
population control, hence the the ACLU's fervent defense of
late term
abortions, because in reality, these do make for a large percentage of
the 1.5 million abortions per year here in America: anywhere from 15-20%
Racism is a universal weakness of the human psyche, and it
is not a malady limited to the pointy hats in the far right. The ACLU proved
this when they successfully fought for the Klan/Aryan Nation's right to
march through
Skokie, Illinois back in the 1977; through a town largely inhabited by
Holocaust survivors. Indeed, the ACLU has consistently fought to legitimize
the Klan and Aryan Nation, but never have they taken a stand against their
terrorism, or fought to redress grievances of
victims
and families of those murdered by the same.
On
behalf of white supremacy, here's their latest crusade.
This isn't to say that the ACLU hasn't been effective in
protecting some of our civil liberties from time to time. Aside from a few
conscientious gems in their ranks, they're pretty much self-interested,
useless and hypocritical bastards guided and duped by the elitist powers
that threaten the Constitution more than anyone else. Look back, and you'll
see their "greatest" accomplishments are in protecting the Klan and other
white supremacists, defending late term abortions and attacking Christianity
(not religion, just Christianity). A recent example is this year in Los
Angeles, when the ACLU's
Ramona Ripston
forced the Board of Supervisors to remake the seal of the
county because it had a tiny Christian cross on it. Doesn't matter that it
was there to denote the fact that Los Angeles was settled by Spanish
missionaries. They forced the change because she argued it violated the
separation of church and state.
If only the ACLU had as much revulsion for the Luciferian
cross of the Klan. Rest assured they would fight for a Klansman's "right" to
burn a cross on a schoolyard, yet send their dogs over a Nativity scene in a
child's creative arts project. To this day if they're not defending child
molesters in
NAMBLA the ACLU is gutting the 14th amendment; defending the Klan's
"right" to serve in high office-
INCLUDING THE
SUPREME COURT- essentially claiming terrorism and treason as free
speech. In doing so, they have defended the Klan's use of judicial and
legislative authority to quietly suppress the rights of racial or religious
"undesirables". Herein the true bias and motive of the ACLU cannot be
concealed, it is both anti-Christian and anti-Constitution. This makes the
present ACLU leadership the most dangerous fox in the henhouse, and until
its ranks are purged of cabalists and anti-Christian zealots, will remain
so.
We should
take a good long look at traditional avenues of legal
assistance, and accept the obvious: the ACLU will not be
there to help us fight the most critical civil rights
battles; that is, any battle challenging the authority
of shadow government- i.e., government by unelected,
unaccountable corporate or Masonic cabals whose rule of
law "legally" supersedes the US Constitution.
The
14th amendment, ratified in 1868, specifically bars ex-Klansmen or any
enemy of the constitution from holding public office. One would think that
the ACLU would appreciate the obvious and go after politicians unlawfully in
office, such as Sen.
Robert
Byrd (D) W. Virginia, who were former Klansmen but not approved for
office by a two-thirds vote of each House, as the amendment specifies. One
would think so, but one would be wrong: this would imply the ACLU actually
reads the Constitution before wiping its ass with it; it would imply sanity.
As you can see, in the mindset of an ACLU lawyer, defending a politician
unlawfully in office, where he can write laws affecting all Americans and
entrench more likeminded and corrupt racist peers seems petty when the ACLU
can go after the real threat to Americans: a tiny cross on a county seal
inoffensive to anyone but the most zealous and thorough anti-Christian bigot
.
Consider the following when you want to see what the ACLU's
leadership has sunk down to...
In 2000, a Boston couple, Robert and
Barbara Curley, sued NAMBLA. According to the Curley's suit,
Charles Jaynes and Salvatore Sicari "stalked Jeffrey Curley... and
tortured, murdered and mutilated [his] body on or about October 1, 1997.
Upon information and belief immediately prior to said acts Charles
Jaynes accessed NAMBLA's website at the Boston Public Library."
According to police, Jaynes had eight issues of a NAMBLA publication in
his home at the time of his arrest. The lawsuit further alleges
that "NAMBLA serves as a conduit for an underground network of
pedophiles in the United States who use their NAMBLA association and
contacts therein and the Internet to obtain child pornography
and promote pedophile activity." The American Civil Liberties Union
stepped in to defend NAMBLA as a free speech matter and won a
dismissal.... The Curleys alleged that Charles Jaynes and
Salvatore Sicari, who were convicted of the rape and murder of their
ten-year-old son Jeffrey, were NAMBLA members.
Again, there are good people in the ACLU, and we shouldn't
throw the baby out with the bath water. You don't throw away a good car
because the driver is drunk. You just avoid riding in it until another
driver comes along. In this case, the ACLU should be preserved and it is
needed, but its leadership must be immediately replaced before
this
cabal's criminal trespasses against the Constitution it claims to defend
brings the wrath of a nation upon good and bad members alike.
We should take a good long look at traditional avenues of
legal assistance, and accept the obvious: the ACLU will not be there to help
us fight the most critical civil rights battles; that is, any battle
challenging the authority of shadow government- i.e., government by
unelected, unaccountable corporate or Masonic cabals whose rule of law
"legally" supersedes the US Constitution. Indeed, with an ACLU member on the
Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, an objective and unbiased perspective
from SCOTUS seems extremely unlikely.
Oh. And on a personal note to Judge
John E. Jones: If you have a secret beef against Christianity, just say so.
Don't cower behind some obscure and hypocritical claim about defending the
concept of separation of church and state when back in the lodge, you're
bowing to the whims of the most obvious and nefarious establishment of
religion to ever plague mankind- the bat-shit crazy, spell-casting High
Priests behind the Temple veil (along with the rest of the hoodwinked,
Masonic judges in your ilk).
The secrecy involved in
all matters pertaining to the Roswell incident was
unparalled. The classification was, from the outset, above
top secret, so the vast majority of U.S. officials and
politicians, let alone a mere allied minister of defence,
were never in-the-loop.... The time has come to lift the
veil of secrecy, and let the truth emerge, so there can be a
real and informed debate, about one of the most important
problems facing our planet today."
MAJIC-12 that is. This special operations manual dated
1954 has a diagram of a UFO type identical to a type
investigated by the Belgian Air Force in 1990. An
analysis of the radar and flight pattern of the UFO can
be
found here.
"As
the reports began to come in on that March evening in
1990, military trackers a few miles south of Brussels
picked up a large unidentified object on their radar.
Two F-16 fighters were scrambled from Beauvechain, the
nearest airbase, to intercept. They climbed to 3,000
feet and locked on to the craft, reporting back to base
that they had intercepted a "structured UFO". But then
suddenly, according to the pilots, it began to behave in
an extraordinary way. Their on-board radar screens
registered a quickly changing diamond shape, which
suddenly accelerated to 600mph before slowing just as
abruptly to 170mph. Then it plunged 3,300 feet in two
seconds and accelerated from 170mph to 1,100mph in the
same time. There was a marked absence of any sonic boom.
According to the instruments aboard the fighters, the
craft pulled away at 46G - 46 times the force of gravity
- enough to crush any human body to pulp. It headed
west across the English Channel towards the fields of
Kent before disappearing into the night sky. During
their 65 minute observation, the pilots took 15
photographs. But pursuit in their F-16s, capable of more
than twice the speed of sound, was impossible."
More here" Type d: Airfoil or triangular design.
This craft is believed to be a new technology due to the
rarity and recency of the observations. Radar
indicates an isosceles triangle profile, the longest
side being nearly 300 feet in length. Little is
known about the performance of these craft due to a
rarity of good sightings, but the are believed to be
capable of high speeds and abrupt maneuvers...
Perhaps
the most pedantic line you'll ever hear from "experts" is
that something doesn't exist because "there is no evidence
of it". Salma Hayek is not in my room. There is no evidence
that she is in my room. Can I therefore say she does not
exist?
"EBE Type I. These
entities are humanoid and might be mistaken for human beings
of the Oriental race if seen from a distance. They are
bipedal. 5-5 feet 4 inches in height and weigh 80-100
pounds. Proportionally they are similar to humans, although
the cranium is somewhat larger and more rounded
The skin is
a pale, chalky-yellow in color, thick, and slightly pebbled
in appearance. The eyes are small, wide-set, almond-shaped
with brownish-black irises with very large pupils. The
whites of the eyes are not like that of humans, but have a
pale gray cast. The ears are small and set low on the skull
The nose is thin and long, and the mouth is wider than in
humans. and nearly lipless. There is no apparent facial hair
and very little body hair, that being very fine and confined
to the underarm and the groin area. The body is thin and
without apparent body fat. but the muscles are
well-developed. The hands are small, with four long digits
but no opposable thumb. The outside digit is jointed in a
manner as to be nearly opposable and there is no webbing
between the fingers as in humans. The legs are slightly but
noticeably bowed, and the feet are somewhat splayed and
proportionally large."
Magic as an Alien Language: The Greater Key of Solomon
Symbols or writing
embossed on craft wreckage. Below are sketches of the same.
MAJIC -12 and some witnesses describe certain hieroglyphics
or patterns that are similar to certain "magical" alphabet
described in The Greater Key of Solomon. The latter
describes the names of angels, their respective planets and
days of influence, and certain other astrological
references. Of particular note herein: "The Characters of
Celestial Writings" and "Malachim or theWriting of
Angels". What is curious about this angle is that the
Greater Key of Solomon is about magic, and the Operation
Majestic-12 is called MAJIC-12 for short. Coincidence?
UFO
Allusions From Egyptian Magic, to King Solomon and
to the Birth of Christ
The birth of
Jesus Christ portrayed in 18th century religious
art.
"Mat 2:9 When they
had heard the king, they departed. And lo, the star which
they saw in the east went before them until it came and
stood over where the child was."
Act 9:3-8: "But
in going, it happened as he [Saul] drew near to Damascus,
even suddenly a light from the heaven shone around him.
And he fell to the earth and heard a voice saying to him,
Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me? And he said, Who
are you, lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom you
persecute. It is hard for you to kick against the goads. And
trembling and astonished, he said, Lord, what will You have
me to do? And the Lord said to him, Arise and go into the
city, and you shall be told what you must do. And the men
who journeyed with him stood speechless, indeed hearing a
voice but seeing no one. And Saul was lifted up from the
earth, his eyes were opened, but he saw no one. But they
led him by the hand and brought him into Damascus."
Was the star of Nativity a UFO? This bible verse details a
hovering bright light in the sky that parallels the typical
UFO account. If you believe Jesus is the Son of God, then
you must accept the fact he is the Son of an
Extraterrestrial, or rather, A SUPREME INTELLIGENCE NOT OF
THIS EARTH, because his Father is in heaven (space). If
anything, it would explain the miraculous events that
surrounded Jesus' birth, life and death. To heal the lepers
and the blind might be a tall order for mankind, but for an
intelligence that can travel across light years and
manipulate space-time, it probably wouldn't be.
Belgium's inadvertent proof the MAJIC-12 document is
genuine. In startling detail, a classified 1954 US army
manual for the recovery and disposal of extraterrestrial craft and
entities describes a UFO type reported in 1990 by the Belgian Air
Force. Moreover, the document details the deception strategy to
be observed by media and government assets, a strategy which has
been consistently employed by the same when discrediting witnesses
and concealing evidence in the process of investigating UFOBs. (aka
UFOs)
Occult symbols as alien writing. The embossed
writing on the Roswell and similar craft wreckage may not only be
deciphered, but may have been known for thousands of years. The link
between the "magical" alphabet of King Solomon's "Characters of
Celestial Writings" and alien writings.
Why the secrecy, and who gains from it? in a word:
no one. Every religion that believes of a God in heaven, or any
religious or secular group that believes in intelligent design,
leaves the door open to accepting that visitations by
extraterrestrial biological entities (EBE's) as
fact doesn't discount the bible, science or other faiths, it actually lends credence to
them. How? by
providing an explanation for the supernatural phenomenon described
by ancient writers such as those of Hindu, Christian, or Jewish
faiths. The Christian or Jew, e.g., has no reason to believe
Jesus or God is not extraterrestrial, since by definition, the term
describes anything not of this earth. The more obvious heresy in
these religions is to believe God and Jesus are both from earth, and
thus merely human. (The latter is the mantra of those who find their
new religion in a recent work of fiction called "The DaVinci Code",
which we will hereafter refer to as the DaVincians.)
Galileo was persecuted for stating that the earth revolves around
the sun. It is not unlikely that religious and even secular figures
today would be just as fervently opposed to scientific inquiries
which suggest or confirmGod and his angels are
just biblical terms for what we now know as EBEs; an advanced
intelligence which may even be involved in our creation from the
very beginning, or at the very least, mistaken for God by the
ancients, much like Cortez was by the Aztecs and Montezuma.
A strange
irony, indeed, when a "hoax" document manages to predict the behavior
and arguments of both government and media skeptics with such disturbing
consistency as to confirm its veracity beyond any doubt. When you know
your opponents arguments before he makes them, any of them, the debate
is over. And I dare say, that's what we may have here.
The debate
in question: are professional UFO skeptics in denial and if not, what's
their agenda? Is it to follow the guidelines of a
Majestic -12 document they claim never existed?
Inside the
manual is a diagram identical to the triangular unidentified craft
reported by the Belgian Air Force. Though some initially proposed what
was seen was the Stealth bomber, the speed of the craft, its
acceleration and unique shape and its ability to maneuver at inhuman G
forces rules that out. Even if unmanned, it is a technology we are only
testing now, and the first sighting of such craft, as noted in this
document, were at and before 1954.
Although
this MAJIC-12 operations manual, and MAJIC-12 itself officially do not
exit, some of you may have recognized this manual as it has been alluded
to, and featured on several of the the History Channel's "The UFO
Files". Whether or not the document is genuine isn't the issue.
What is the
issue is that the contents mirror official policy and behavior, tacitly
vindicating the document's veracity, and that the methodology for the
discrediting witnesses employing both media and government channels is
explicitly outlined and emulated.
When those
who counter eyewitness accounts from reliable sources rely on arguments
suggested in the "hoax" manual itself, it's hard not to chuckle. Most of
these smug assholes masturbate to the pages of the Skeptical
Inquirer, and seldom stop long enough to read an actual book or
form their own opinions. Consider the suggestions offered by Chapter 3
in the manual in question:
"It
may become necessary to issue false statements to preserve the
security of the site [area of UFO crash]. Meteors, downed
satellites, weather balloons, and military aircraft are all
acceptable alternatives..."
Some
writers have made careers using all of the false statements above to
"debunk" the idea and mathematical probability that we are not alone in
this vast universe. In other words, they have made their careers at the
expense of too many honest and courageous witnesses to have any claim to
good intentions, or any moral fiber whatsoever.
Those
Annoying Flat Earth Skeptic Tanks
According
to these collective knee-jerk skeptic tanks, there is no evidence to
suggest we have made contact with alien intelligence, or that it even
exists. But stop and think about that. Isn't that a study in denial? And
if not that, isn't it a pitiful conceit? Besides, no evidence is ever
good enough for those who choose to ignore it. Perhaps the most idiotic
and pedantic line you'll ever hear on television is that something
doesn't exist because "there is no evidence of it".
President
George W. Bush is not in my room. There is no evidence that he is in my
room. Can I therefore say he does not exist?
Of course
not. It's beyond flawed and childish logic, it's idiocy, yet is an
argument accepted with the utmost gravity when one of these Skeptical
Inquirer dipshits are interviewed on television documentaries.
Honestly, watching these pundits babble away makes me wonder how it is
possible for any objective interviewer to listen to them without
instinctively slapping the shit out of them for wasting their time.
I'm all for
seeing intelligent debate between two opposing views, but refusing to
accept or consider scientifically presented evidence doesn't debunk it
no matter what your credentials are, especially if you can
present no evidence of your own to prove conclusively we exist alone in
this universe, and always have. One should be much more comfortable with
"I don't know" than with a smug assertion of certainty of non-existence
when it is not warranted.
Again, when considering the predictable
arguments and dissents from "experts", media figures or other
"authorities", a quote from Chapter 3, item 12 in this MAJIC-12 army
manual is in order. The following illustrates both motive and the
argument origins in deception:
"Press Blackout Great care must be taken to preserve the security of any location
where Extraterrestrial Technology might be retrievable for
scientific study. Extreme measures must be taken to protect and
preserve any material or craft from discovery, examination, or
removal by civilian agencies or individual- of the general public.
It is therefore recommended that a total press blackout be initialed
whenever possible. If this course of action should not prove
feasible, the following cover stories are suggested for release to
the press. The officer in charge will act quickly to select the
cover story’ that best fits the situation. It should he remembered
when selecting a cover story that official policy regarding UFOBs
[unidentified flying objects] is that they do not exist.
a.
Official Denial. The most desirable response would
be that nothing unusual has occurred. By stating that the
government has no knowledge of the event, further investigation
by the public press may be forestalled.
b.
Discredit Witnesses. If at all possible, witnesses
will he held incommunicado until the extent of their knowledge
and involvement can be determined Witnesses will be discouraged
from talking about what they have seen, and intimidation may be
necessary to ensure their cooperation. If witnesses have already
contacted the press, it will be necessary to discredit their
stories. This can best be done by the assertion that they have
either misinterpreted natural events, ore the victims of
hysteria or hallucinations, or are the perpetrators of hoaxes.
c.
Deceptive Statements. It may become necessary to
issue false statements to preserve the security of the site.
Meteors, downed satellites, Feather balloons, and military
aircraft are all acceptable alternatives, although in the case
of the downed military aircraft statement care should be
exercised not to suggest that the aircraft might be
experimental or secret, as this might arouse more curiosity of
both the American and the foreign press. Statements issued
concerning contamination of the area due to toxic spill from
trucks or railroad tankers can also serve to keep unauthorized
or undesirable personnel away from the area."
The Writing on the Craft and Occult Symbols
On some accounts, the manual and witnesses have described alien writing on
the craft or its parts. In section 11, item g of Chapter 1 in the MAJIC-12
document, we read the following:
"Several samples were engraved or embossed with marks and patterns. These
patterns were not readily identifiable and attempts to decipher their
meaning has been largely unsuccessful."
Some witnesses describe certain hieroglyphics/patterns that are similar to
certain "magical" alphabet described in The Greater Key of Solomon, an ancient
occult work that is said to be King Solomon's book of magic. The latter also
describes the names of angels and how to summon them, their respective planets
and days of influence, and certain other astrological references. What is
curious about this angle is that The Greater Key of Solomon is about magic, and
the Operation Majestic-12 is called MAJIC-12 for short. Coincidence?
This brings us to the following question:
Is King Solomon's "magical alphabet" an actual alien language? The short
answer, for now: stay tuned. It should be noted, however, that ancient Egyptians
which preceded Solomon had some very curious drawings and mythology regarding
what we would today call UFOs and EBEs, or Extraterrestrial Biological Entities.
By definition, any entity from "heaven", be it an angel or cherubim,
qualifies as extraterrestrial. Countless books have been written about the bible
making numerous references to alien encounters between key figures in the book.
Religious renaissance art features UFOs in the the background.
We won't get into that right now, but it is something you might to research
on your own.
The bottom line: How does this affect you?
Religion. Perhaps the most serious and far-reaching repercussion of this
knowledge, is our understanding of religion, particularly Christianity and
Judaism. The reality of extraterrestrial visitation in this age and the ages
past lends credence to many of the supernatural miracles described in the bible,
since any advanced technology and intelligence would appear as magic to the
peoples of the time just as much as an airplane would appear supernatural to a
caveman.
Let us take an example from Exodus that seems absurd to biblical
skeptics, or at best, metaphorical...
In the Old Testament, we see a stand-off between the "magic" of Moses
and the magicians of the pharaoh. Both were able to transform their staffs to
snakes, but Moses' ate the snakes of the Pharaoh.
Exodus 7:8-12:And the LORD spake unto Moses and unto Aaron, saying, " When Pharaoh shall speak unto you, saying, Shew a miracle for you: then thou
shalt say unto Aaron, Take thy rod, and cast it before Pharaoh, and it shall
become a serpent." And Moses and Aaron went in unto Pharaoh, and they did so
as the LORD had commanded: and Aaron cast down his rod before Pharaoh, and
before his servants, and it became a serpent. Then Pharaoh also called the
wise men and the sorcerers: now the magicians of Egypt, they also did in
like manner with their enchantments. For they cast down every man his rod,
and they became serpents: but Aaron's rod swallowed up their rods.
Seems fantastic doesn't it? However, if you see this account as one
involving the emissaries of two opposing extraterrestrial
intelligences (EBEs), then it doesn't seem so fantastic. A
being that can defy gravity, travel in "flying chariots" like spacecraft,
use telepathy like dream messaging, use
technology to wipe out armies could also have the technological "majik" to
account for aforementioned miracle. In fact, this appears to be an account of a
superior EBE technology and wisdom defeating another, both sides using human
recipients of extraterrestrial intelligence to perform the miracles.
Whether the magic involved was the creation of life via the transformation of
inanimate matter or something completely different, what seems quite possible is that both the
Hebrews and the Egyptians were exposed to extraterrestrial entities. Moses and
the burning bush is a case in point of a possible close encounter. Indeed, even
Egyptian drawings of the time (see inset) allude to such life, in
particular Type II EBEs.
As for Judeo-Christianity, cherubim or angels fit the profile of Type I EBEs.
They are human in appearance but don't have wings. They could fly, however.
The conception of angels as winged beings, so familiar in Christian art, finds
no support in Scripture (except, perhaps Dan_9:21; Rev_14:6, where angels are
represented as “flying”). More often, we read of "chariots of fire" in heaven.
Webster's in fact, describes cherubim as "an order
of angels " or a "a beautiful, usually winged child in paintings and sculpture".
Curiously, a look at the EBE Type 1
does indeed strike one as being both human and child-like in appearance. To the
the Christian or Jew, the full disclosure of extraterrestrial life and
visitations will validate a great part of faith: the belief in a supreme
intelligence that watches over us. The extraterrestrial is the proof of
God, and the fallen EBE, Lucifer.
The EBE is proof we are not alone, that a superior
extraterrestrial intelligence exists and
that as such, that we ourselves may have arisen by intelligent design
in an argument that has nothing to do with religion; only probability, physical
evidence, historical evidence, and fact. Intelligent design, in this
perspective, does not contradict evolution, it supplements it by arguing a
species can evolve on its own or with help.
One thing that no religious scholar can deny is that the bible is a
testament of extraterrestrial visitations and their lasting impact on mankind.
They call these visitations and encounters angelic (e.g. Archangel Michael) and
demonic visitations (e.g. Lucifer, whom according to scripture is now bound
to earth). Note that non-mammalian, EBE Type II
aliens would include the "Reptilians" common in global eyewitness reports, and a
serpent is of course, a reptile not unlike the serpent in the Garden of Eden.
And the scripture notes that Lucifer and a third of his angels fell to earth from heaven.
The actions of these visitors- most notably telepathy and flying- are
miracles (as their technology would appear to them and even modern man);
but angels are not of this earth, they are extraterrestrial
biological entities that just happen to believe in, or represent
"God".
Seeding the Earth
In the Old Testament, we read accounts of angels coming down from heaven to
have sex with the women of earth. Their offspring, it was written, were giants.
Today, of the countless reports of UFO abductions, how many involve experiments
with human reproduction?
Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after
that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare
children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of
renown.
The Klansmen who "wiped out a
thousand future generations of niggers" and the prosecutors
who let them..
The
Atlanta
Child
Killings
FBI
Analysis
of
Atlanta
Child
Killings
Points
to KKK
LEFT:
White
male
suspect
in
Atlanta
Child
Killings.
There
were
several. RIGHT:
The man
convicted,
Wayne
Williams
LEFT: Note sent to
several papers in early March, which reads "Stop forced bussing or I
will kill three more black boys in Atlanta in March!" Three of the
Atlanta Child Killings took place in March, no more, no less.
RIGHT: FBI
report concerning brown Caucasian hairs found at a murder
scene.
"GOALS OF A
TERRORIST GROUP:
There are three
main goals of
any terrorist
group that fit
into the pattern
in Atlanta.
1;
To instill a
sense of terror
in the community
in which the
group operates.
2:
By being able to
act and not get
caught, the
group shows the
weakness of the
government, and
undermines
public support
for and
confidence in
it.
3: To replace
the existing
government with
one made up of
supporters of
the group), or
that the group
supports. In
Atlanta, goals 1
and 2 have been
achieved, and
the next
election will
determine if
goal 3 is
reached."
They "wiped out a thousand
future generations of niggers". Those were the words of Don Sanders,
Atlanta Klan leader, captured on tape in 1981. The burning question
is whether the voice print matches that on a cassette left at the
burial site of two victims. Those results, of course, are blacked
out in the case files now available to the public.
At least 29 murdered children in a space of less
than two years...in one city alone. Even more remain
missing.
Yet the case was
practically solved. They had Caucasian DNA in brown hair samples,
they had his latent prints on a porno magazine found at the burial
site of two victims, along with a cassette tape with the taunting
voice of the killer! They had eyewitnesses ranging from a white
woman in bar who heard the suspect predict the next boy would be
found strangled in a river, which in fact was the case; to a young
boy who barely escaped a man fitting the same description: a white
male, brown hair, scar on neck or check.
Yet they let him go because
"he passed a lie detector test", which if even true, is a standard
of proof that wouldn't hold up in any court of law. Worse, none of
this exculpatory evidence was presented to the defense in the Wayne
Williams trial. Wayne Williams was, in fact, convicted in the murder
of two adults, on questionable carpet fiber evidence that has since
been discredited as reliable; yet the judge allowed prosecutors to
tack on the child killings because "they fit a pattern".
This is a story about the
Atlanta Child Murders. It is not merely one of inept or corrupt
officials unwilling to challenge powerful Klan elements in southern
law enforcement and the Atlanta judicial system. It goes beyond that
and challenges all of us to confront the question posed by the
Klansmen of the time. Would anybody "really care about a bunch of
murdered nigger children"?
I dare say that some 25
years later, we still do. We just aren't heard.
Or maybe Greta VanSustern
answered that question for us already. We have
Natalie Holloway to
worry about, don't we? A case like this just wouldn't appeal to
viewers. Or so she would have us think.
Though Georgia officials at first suspected the Klan in the
Atlanta Child Murders, they abruptly changed course and refused to provide the
Williams defense with the exculpatory evidence they had accumulated. But it
wasn't just the Georgia Bureau of Investigations who had such evidence in the
hands. So did the FBI: fingerprints and hair samples from a Caucasian male left
at the crime scene.
On February 9th,1981, a young black child was followed home from
school. His apartment door was opened, the area was ransacked as the child hid
under a bed. Nothing of value was stolen. Two days later, this suspect was seen
in the vicinity of the boy's school. Later that day another attempt was made to
gain entry into the apartment. His mother screamed and the the child saw the
same man peering through the window, a blue-eyed white male with a scar on his
neck. Following this incident, an unidentified caller threatened "I am going to
kill the boy in 48 hours"
By then his mother had purchased a padlock and took extra
precautions. While at his grandmother's house on Feb. 17, however, the same man
chased the boy for several blocks.
At around that time latent prints had been lifted from two
pornographic magazines found at the burial site of two victims. The accosted boy
viewed five photographs and selected the man to whom the latent prints belonged.
Incredibly, investigators dismissed his claims due to a discrepancy in witness
reports of beard growth between mid Feb and March. The suspect was never
charged, despite the latent prints and this positive identification from a child
that well-remembered his face.
Instead, prosecutors charged Wayne Bertram Williams, lacking
witnesses, credible physical evidence, and most importantly: prints. Williams
was initially charged with killing two black men, but prosecutors were allowed
to charge him with the Atlanta Child Killings simply because "they fit a
pattern."
The following profile is one of several FBI documents detailing
their concerns regarding Klan involvement in the Atlanta Child Killings,
including notes that some right-wing elements in the local police department
could very well have been involved...
In Atlanta, at least 29 children were
murdered between 1978 and 1981. Fingerprints,
witnesses and even Caucasian hairs at the crime
scene pointed to a white man, with possible
accomplices. Prosecuted for the crime, however,
was a black man. The party truly responsible,
according to FBI documents only recently
released, was believed to be a Klan cell with
local police connections.
What they found
they will contest in court
before telling you... because
apparently, unproven
theoretical "accident
findings" are a threat to national security
(presidential privilege).
FLIGHT 800:
How the TWA Flight
800 cover-up opened the
door to 9-11. An
introduction to a
developing story....
By 1996, Clinton's Favorite Toilet Paper Was No Longer Charmin... but Flight 800 Eyewitness Reports
Here, Clinton tells friendly print and broadcast
media assets that a plane flying from NYC to Paris could do so on empty fuel tanks. They bought it, and still do. Bubba must really think you're a fucking tard.
If you believe
him, Bubba is
right.
Over 270 Eyewitness Reports
Just 4 of over 270 eyewitness reports detailing ascending flare or missile striking Flight 800.
Eric Harris
(left)- one of the two killers and teen
white supremacists in the Columbine
Massacre- noted in his diary of plans to
hijack planes and crash them into New York
City. This was long before 9-11. It was a dream of the
Klan since it was perceived as the heart of Jewish
economic tyranny, and it was a dream that evidently
trickled down to Harris. The Harris video in question
is here.
Pictured is a drawing posted by Harris
on his AOL web page. Note the Klan figure.
Lately,
we've been hearing a lot about the abuse of the term
"national security" and how under this pretense,
just about any form of corruption could be concealed
indefinitely. While the Bush Administration is often
criticized- rightfully so- for appealing to it far too readily after
9-11, it is an odious practice that every
president has appealed to since
Johnson.
(See
Judge Grants
Im