No Child in History was Ever as Unwanted by the State As a fetus- an unborn child, Jesus was targeted, this to the point of genocide. He was much like the undesirable unborn childof certain classes are today, particularly low income whites and minorities. Massacre of the Innocents Depiction of Herod's slaughter of 14,000 infants in tan attempt to kill Jesus. From the Paintings of Armadio degli Argenti. (Click to enlarge) "Authorities tell us that 75% of the school-children are defective... physically or mentally below par." Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, regarding 22 million American schoolchildren as noted in her book Pivot of Civilization. The solution proposed by Sanger was not better schooling, but the segregation and forced sterilization of these "defective" 75%. The authorities cited by Sanger included American and Nazi eugenicists. Imagine the Banning of Judges Opposed to the Dred Scott Decision... or who Merely Sought Limits on This "Surely the Virgin Mary would smile upon our nation's celebration of choice, despite the fact 1/3 of a generation of Americans were lost to abortion since 1973's Roe vs. Wade. Surely even Jesus could bear the sight of late term abortions or babies in dumpsters, if taking an innocent human life was excused with the noble expedient of a woman's convenience." Kerry's Political Doublespeak Translation Rev. John "Malthus" Kerry at the Church of Christians Against Christ and Latter Day Abortionist Saints On October 13, 2004, Sen. John Kerry affirmed that if elected, any justice who opposed limits on partial birth abortions would not be nominated to the Supreme Court. 7 of 10 US voterssupport limits on partial birth abortions. Thus, the pool of approved judges would only be within 9% of US voters. Judges in the pool of 70% who support limits on partial birth abortions would not be nominated, and until their stance was known, neither would the 21% who were undecided. The Supreme Court is Anything but Ethically Infallible Dred Scot Decision, 1857: Blacks are property, not human, according to the infamous Supreme Court ruling. Roe vs. Wade, 1973: The Unborn Child not human, but anything from a  parasite to an insentient cluster of cells. The Unborn Child Less than an Animal. Seriously. The same women who would march for animal rights wouldn't bat an eye when it comes to late term abortions.

How Christ was an Unwanted Child

King Herod slaughtered 14,000 children hoping to kill this one unborn child.

In a very real sense, the baby Jesus was also an unwanted child...wanted by his parents*, but not by the state; by Herod.** To this end Herod had slaughtered all the male children under two in Bethlehem and Judea in an attempt to kill Jesus. This "Massacre of the Innocents" amounted to approximately 14,000 children.

Today, most US abortion clinics are built in low income white or minority areas, and this is the way the state gets rid of this particular unwanted child. The minority areas, however, are also targeted with television commercials. Ever see an abortion clinic commercial? watch Spanish television, and you will. English stations wouldn't dare cross this line.

As a fetus- an unborn child, Jesus was also unwanted by the state- unwanted enough to induce a state to genocide that he might never live. He was targeted, much like the "undesirable" unborn child of certain classes are today; particularly low income whites and minorities,  Knowing this...

Where do you think the sympathies of Jesus really are? He was also poor, if you recall, poor enough to be born in a manger.

It should be noted that the court that gave us Roe vs. Wade was led by Chief Justice Earl Warren, a former Klan leader from Bakersfield, California. The significance of this herein is simple: eugenics, particularly via the population control of minorities is a key goal and dogma of the Klan and its ilk, and it remains its greatest objective along with the dissolution or control of minority political power.

In WWII, Germans were wanted, Jews and Russians were unwanted, and 6 million Jews and some 20 million Russians died. Between 1914-15, in Turkey, the Turks were wanted, the Christians unwanted... and 2 million Christians died.  In Rwanda, 1994, the Hutus were wanted, the Tutsis were unwanted, and the ensuing genocide literally clogged Rwandan rivers with Tutsi bodies. In Bosnia, around the same time, Serbs were wanted, Muslims unwanted, and yet another genocide ensued.

Today, in America, a mother is in a hospital getting a sonogram, pregnant with a "wanted baby".

Another mother at the exact same stage of pregnancy is at an abortion clinic, getting a sonogram in preparation for the killing of an "unwanted" baby. Two labels: "wanted" and "unwanted". Same victim class. One label affords full human rights, the other is a death sentence.

It's genocide by definition.

 The Dred Scott Decision of Our Time

In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks -- slaves as well as free -- were not and could never become citizens of the United States. It was decided that a black man had no rights a white man was bound to respect. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thereby legalizing slavery in all of the country's territories. In effect, the decision declared the non-white, particularly the African-American, was at best subhuman property. The repercussions were immediate... the South now had the Supreme Court using the Constitution itself to justify the inhumanity of slavery. (The abolitionists, like the slave owners, also used the Bible and Constitution as foundations for their arguments.)  It took the American Civil War just a few years later to shatter the yoke of the Dred Scott decision.

This would not be the last time the Supreme Court erred grievously, nor the last time it failed to consider biological and physiological realities when making decision relying on the same. Far from it.

  Continued

Related

• THE ESSENTIAL FALLACIES OF MALTHUSIAN TEACHING (the population control crowd) "In the first place, it is true that a population might increase in geometrical progression, and that a woman might bear thirty children in her lifetime; but it is wrong to assume that because a thing might happen, it therefore does happen. The population, as a matter of fact, does not increase in geometrical progression, because Nature places her own checks on the birth-rate, and no woman bears all the children she might theoretically bear, apart altogether from artificial birth control."

• The Sanger Paradox. Some notes on the The Pivot of Civilization, the book by Margaret Sanger,  Planned Parenthood's  founder.  An excerpt:  "The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be faced immediately. Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be segregated during the reproductive period...we prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded."(So much for choice.) Sanger, a eugenicist, was a fierce proponent of class and racial segregation and makes it quite clear in her book, yet she is still championed as a "progressive" icon of the feminist movement by the likes of the Today Show's Katie Couric.

Notes

*Mat 2:13 And when they had departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise and take the young child and His mother and flee into Egypt. And be there until I bring you word, for Herod is about to seek the child to destroy Him.

**Mat 2:16 Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked by the wise men, was greatly enraged. And he sent and killed all the boys in Bethlehem, and in all its districts, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had carefully inquired of the wise men.

Think Drug Prohibition Works? So did these Guys

Behold the photos on the right. What did Al Capone and the Klansman have in common? both favored the nation's first drug prohibition law, the Prohibition Act. The KKK, in fact, was instrumental in passing the alcohol Prohibition laws that led to the greatest spike in organized crime our nation had ever seen. And why was Prohibition passed? to reduce alcohol related crime!

The fact of the matter is, whenever you see a politician that favors drug prohibition laws, you're seeing a man whose policies favor organized crime. He knows this and he takes you for a fool. So ask yourself if there's something in it for him, just as there was for corrupt Chicago politicians Al Capone put or kept in power. Ask yourself sincerely if your support for such a man actually empowers drug lords, and if you voted for this person, ask yourself if the ass reaming you just got from him was worth the false sense of security.

Another reason the drug cartels love the clueless "Drug Free America" dittoheads is because is because  they profit handsomely from marijuana being illegal, as do certain Klan-tied masonic cabals that keep the black market profits obscenely inflated via prohibition-modeled legislation. The latter insures they get a good cut. Why else would they so earnestly try to defend an indefensible prohibition model that is the equivalent of a dog returning to its vomit?

In fact, drug cartels would suffer a devastating  financial blow if marijuana was legal, regulated and taxed. Marijuana, unlike cocaine, doesn't have to be processed. It grows anywhere. Making it legal would deprive cartels the black market profits of a key cash crop. This is why marijuana is listed as a Class 1 narcotic, as opposed to cocaine, which is listed as Class 2. The latter means that there are limited uses for cocaine and thus, it is perceived by the FDA as less dangerous than marijuana. But ask any doctor or policeman which is the more dangerous of the two, in terms of addiction, overdose, and crime, and see what they tell you. These people don't give a damn about your kids or crime. These wolves in sheep's clothing parading about as if they had any interest for anyone but themselves.

To understand the true motives of the neo-Prohibitionists, you have to understand greed has no limits in Washington DC. The lure of untraceable funding for anything from political campaigns to waging war is one too tempting to ignore. Consider the time the CIA sold coke on our streets to fund the Contra war. To refresh your memory: a piece of the Eric Umansky article reads as follows:

Oliver North's diary contained at least two extraordinary entries:

From a July 12, 1985, meeting with Richard Secord, North's boss in the Reagan administration:

"$14M to finance came from drugs."

This entry, which was given in part to the Kerry Committee, was first reported in NEWSWEEK. North claimed he did nothing wrong and said the Kerry Committee was "just playing politics and dragging out wild charges."

And this entry on Aug. 9, 1985, which was submitted as part of the Iran-Contra special prosecutor report:

"Honduran DC-6 which is being used for runs out of New Orleans is probably being used for drug runs into U.S."

Related:

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition; War on Drugs, Howard Woodridge

• Medical Marijuana Bad, Right Wing Death Squad Coke Good

How to win the "war on drugs" and preserve democracy by arming  the Medillin Cartel's Paramilitary Death Squads

Columbian President Uribe: Pablo Escobar's Bag Man Columbian President Uribe. Elected with Medellin drug cartel funds via GMP Productos Quimicos, SA. Pablo Escobar downed this plane in a failed effort to kill just one man. His henchman is now our Columbian ally in the "war on drugs."  134 died, including 2 Americans. From Village People to Village Idiot Orrin Hatch (in cowboy hat) before the band decided against including a village idiot in the ensemble.  Hatch, a failed musician, is still seeking a record deal and pushing legislation to raise the age limit to 90 on American Idol.

"Uribe was linked to a business involved in narcotics activities in the US... Has worked for the Medillin Cartel and is a close personal friend of Pablo Escobar...He has participated in Escobar's political campaign to win the position of assistant parliamentarian..."

U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)

From Copyright to Terrorism; the Interweaving of Seemingly Unrelated Bills Common

Marxist Coke Bad, Right Wing Death Squad Coke Good

But just how sincere was Hatch? At the same time, Columbian President Uribe, a key US ally in our so-called drug war, was known to the US  intelligence community to be linked to the Medellin Cartel and was a close personal friend of NARCO-TERRORIST Pablo Escobar, a man suspected of ordering over 100 murders and the bombing of an Avianca jet in 1989. 

Hatch, unfortunately, sees nothing wrong with fighting the cocaine and heroin trade with the help of a man who prevented Escobar's extradition to the United States. See below. See full  PDF file here.

Although it remains without question that Uribe has cracked down on some drug cartels in Columbia, evidence suggests American aid has only helped him crack down on competing cartels as opposed to all of them. Consider Pedro Juan Moreno Villa, Uribe's campaign manager and former chief of staff. Between 1997 and 1998, US customs agents in California seized 50,000 kilos of potassium permanganate, a "precursor chemical" critical to the production of cocaine. It was bound for Medillin, Columbia. The final destination? GMP Productos Quimicos, S. A. (GMP Chemical Product), a company owned by Uribe's campaign manager. According to then DEA Chief Donnie R. Marshall, the aforementioned seizures were enough to make 15 billion dollars worth of cocaine.

Columbian military death squad victims Medical Marijuana Bad, Death Squad Coke Good If you consider Sen. Orrin Hatch, the copyright issue is a smokescreen for another agenda: the control of information in the digital age, about policing all electronic traffic under the Orwellian guise of protecting property rights,  fighting terrorism or the drug war. Sen. Orin Hatch,the Senate Judiciary Chairman. In his world, the real threat to Americans is the First Amendment's rebirth on the internet, not something like, say.. his tacit approval and funding of a major right-wing Columbian drug cartel over a leftist one. The right-wing Columbian coke that hits our streets is no less deadly than that sold by Marxist cartels. Are US  politicians who facilitate its transport and sale in the US no less guilty than the urban drug dealers filling our prisons? Regardless, Hatch seems convinced that the only way to win the drug war is to attack file sharers and ally yourself with the most deadly elements of the drug trade- in fact, with the henchman of the world's bloodiest narco-terrorist ever: Pablo Escobar, a man who made Al Capone look like Ned Flanders. Another reason the drug cartels love Hatch and his ilk is because  they profit handsomely from marijuana being illegal. In fact, they would suffer a devastating  financial blow if marijuana was legal, regulated and taxed. Marijuana, unlike cocaine, doesn't have to be processed. It grows anywhere. Making it legal would deprive cartels the black market profits of a key cash crop. War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength, Failure is Victory Is Hatch's Victory Act a Page Out of 1984? (aka Patriot Act II, Induce Act) Set in a nightmarish totalitarian future where "ignorance is strength", George Orwell's classic, 1984 is now more relevant than ever before. In 1984 former allied nations become enemies, then allies again, to perpetuate a global war that keeps Big Brother in power indefinitely. Big Brother's generous use of the word "Victory" in messages, products, buildings, squares, etc. is a subliminal element of "Newspeak", the official language of Oceana. The term as used in the book is to remind citizens that victory is at hand when in fact, Big Brother's war is perpetual by design. Examples of Newspeak include the following: Big Brother's slum tenement wherein Winston lives (Ex.1) is called the Victory Mansion. He smokes rationed Victory cigarettes. He also drinks Victory coffee, Victory gin, and he meets his doomed love interest in Victory Square. Big Brother's enemies seemingly change every other month, insuring an endless war that can never be won. Interestingly, the enemy of Big Brother is portrayed as a terrorist group whose infiltration requires the unchecked monitoring of citizens by the state to insure loyalty and obedience. This brings us back to Orrin Hatch... Is Hatch's Victory Act Orwellian? Let's see...  not unlike the examples of Newspeak in 1984, Hatch abuses the word "Victory" to falsely imply we are fighting a traditional war, a fixed and definite enemy as opposed to an indefinite war against a fluid religion of terror with many unspoken or unknown architects. This is not to say that it is impossible to find a way to make terrorists a liability to any country, there is a way to make them obsolete pariahs, not martyrs, and we must find it.

So are we actually fighting a war against the drug trade, or simply fighting the competition of a drug cartel friendly to the US?

Such matters once were invisible to the American public before the internet came along. And this seems to bother Hatch and his ilk considerably, because catering to the television and radio industries might keep this and other secrets off the air, but catering to the net won't do a thing to curtail the ultimate dissemination of what's really going on in Washington DC. And even if the networks had the integrity to side with the public interest, their licenses are always subject to the FCC. Luckily, the FCC doesn't control internet content. This is why the real news is always online first, and then carried by the networks when it snowballs into a story too big to ignore.

So if you're in bed with drug dealers and human rights offenders, and your minions in the broadcast media can't help you conceal this obscenity, what to do? why, censor the internet! and how does one do it? start by attacking the means of any anonymous distribution of information. Link P2P and the internet itself to child pornography, terrorism, organized crime, ball cancer, and spontaneous combustion (most of which Hatch has already done) and suddenly you have an avalanche of legislation aimed at curtailing or eliminating the free exchange of information Americans are enjoying for the first time.  Americans, for the first time in history, spend more time in front of the computer than a television set and get more of their news online...and not just more detailed news, but news they actually care about.

As such, the more viewers lost to the internet, the easier it is to find broadcast media assets (FOX, CNN, NBC, ABC et al) to sow hysteria about the net, and we see it all the time. (Speaking of which, network media assets are encouraged to link here.)

Hatch seems convinced that the only way to win the drug war is to attack file sharers and ally yourself with the most deadly  elements of the drug trade- in fact, with the henchman of the world's bloodiest narco-terrorist ever. It doesn't take a political science major to see he's creating a crisis where none exists; this, perhaps, to divert attention from the fact  that he's a part of the problem he claims to address. More ominously, it appears he wants powers our Constitution explicitly prohibits any man to have. Why? perhaps to guarantee no accountability.

Related Links:

National Security ArchivesMore on the role of Uribe in the Medellin cartel.

Uribe's Hidden Past "Uribe’s strategy is to bring the war out into the open, to declare social organizations illegal, and to use the army and police against them directly, while holding “negotiations” with the paramilitaries. Given the murderous tactics that Uribe is prepared to resort to, it is easy to understand why trade unionists and human rights defenders are inclined to feel despondent. It also makes the unquestioning support being offered Uribe by the U.S. and British governments all the more immoral"

Narco News; Candidate Uribe "In 1997 and 1998, alert U.S. Customs agents in California seized three suspicious Colombia-bound ships that, the agents discovered, were laden with 50,000 kilos of potassium permanganate, a key "precursor chemical" necessary for the manufacture of cocaine. According to a document signed by then-DEA chief Donnie R. Marshall on August 3, 2001, the ships were each destined for Medellín, Colombia, to a company called GMP Productos Quimicos, S. A. (GMP Chemical Products).  The 50,000 kilos of the precursor chemical destined for GMP were enough to make half-a-million kilos of cocaine hydrochloride, with a street value of $15 billion U.S. dollars. The owner of GMP Chemical Products, according to the 2001 DEA chief's report, is Pedro Juan Moreno Villa, the campaign manager, former chief of staff, and longtime right-hand-man for front-running Colombian presidential candidate Alvaro Uribe Vélez."

Cocaine dollars go for cheap in Columbia (Reuters 9-15-04)

Take Action:Aware of the popularity of file sharing (P2P) and the potential repercussions to at least 61 millions Americans, The INDUCE Act is being fast-tracked through the Senate to avoid public input and debate. (One tech pundit is listing all the technologies threatened by the bill, including personal computers!) Incidentally, NPR also covered the controversy surround the INDUCE Act.