| The JFK Assassination: It Was Johnson |
|
|
|
| Cloak and Dagger | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Perspective.
All of these predictions came to pass, except one: Castro and the Russians could not be blamed, because the KGB had conclusive evidence that Vice-President Lyndon Baines Johnson was responsible for the assassination. Indeed, not long afterwards, Robert F. Kennedy would confront Johnson directly and ask "why did you have my brother killed?" Thus, the plans to invade Cuba for the false flag operation that killed Kennedy were scrapped. Instead, the war machine turned its attention to Vietnam. Here's a look at the key players acting under Johnson, their varied motivations, and who gained from the assassination...
RFK Confronts LBJ on Why he Killed His Brother Â
Nov. 22, 2007 Warren Commission Member and President Gerald Ford Confessed CIA Cover-Up of JFK Assassination, Directly Implicating JohnsonBut why Johnson? Simple. Only the newly sworn-in President Lyndon Johnson had full control of the CIA and FBI immediately after the assassination. No one else had this authority. Moreover, Johnson's suspect presidential orders regarding the case dismiss any argument he was unaware of the cover-up. As Vice-President Lyndon Johnson's ties to organized crime led to Kennedy dropping him from the ticket in 1964, Johnson found ready, secret allies in the planners of a segregationist-t-masonic coup consisting chiefly of high level Klansmen in high office and the military and members of the intelligence communities recently fired by Kennedy over the Bay of Pigs. The Klan, before you dismiss them too soon, was a major political force in the South and was the engine behind segregation and the deadly attacks on the Civil Rights movement. It was a national movement which chapters, or Klaverns, in almost every state and was an organized, monstrous political apparatus dating back to the early twenties, when membership had reached approximately 5,000,000. On November 9, 1963, one Klansman had already predicted Kennedy would be killed in Dallas on November 22, 1963, and moreover, Klan death death threats had also led to cancellation of Kennedy's Miami visit. That member, Joseph Milteer, even predicted in a secret recording that Kennedy would be killed from an office building, with a high-powered rifle, and that a patsy would be arrested immediately thereafter. It is telling that the man whom Johnson chose to head the Warren Commission was himself a former leader in the KKK, Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren. Is it any wonder if any evidence pointing to the Klan's involvement, no matter how small, was immediately discounted by the Warren Commission? Earl Warren had become progressive by then, since after all, he was the one that helped desegregate the schools, but the protection of the Klan made it clear that he chose to undermine the investigation from day one. Maybe he believed Johnson's claim: that exposing the segregationist role in the killing would incite civil war. Maybe it was a cop-out because he knew it would reflect terribly on his past, as a Klan leader in Bakersfield, CA. After all Hugo Black, another Supreme Court justice, never lived down his Klan affiliations either. The most compelling witnesses implicating Johnson, directly and indirectly, included at least two members of Warren Commission members:
Madeline Brown made for an interesting witness indeed. She described a meeting with Johnson that included H.L. Hunt, J. Edgar Hoover, Clyde Tolsen, Richard M. Nixon, John J. McCloy.
It's important to note that John J. McCloy, whom Brown claimed was present at that meeting, was a member of the now discredited Warren Commission which "investigated" the assassination, appointed by none other than Johnson. Nixon himself was in Dallas on the day of the assassination. As Vice-President Lyndon Johnson's ties to organized crime led to Kennedy dropping him from the ticket in 1964, Johnson found ready allies in a segregationist-masonic coup consisting chiefly of high level Klansmen in local and federal office. Indeed, in 1963, at least two Supreme Court Justices were once members of the KKK, and knowing even "former" Klansmen were masonically oathbound to protect their own, Johnson would appoint one of them, Chief Justice Earl Warren, to lead a mock investigation of the assassination. Warren was a former Klan leader in Bakersfield, California. At the moment of Kennedy's death, Johnson assumed Executive power, and had all the resources of the army, navy, CIA, FBI, etc. to conceal and destroy evidence, silence witnesses and intimidate the press. Klan death threats had led to a cancellation of a Miami visit in 1963, but on Nov. 9, 1963, almost two weeks before the assassination, Klansman Joseph Milteer detailed a plot to kill Kennedy in Dallas, from an office building with a high powered rifle. The recording of this conversation can be The videos below should clearly demonstrate the power of the segregationists, particularly Klansman, in the months preceding Kennedy's death. It took federal troops to bring the first black students to all white schools, and what ensued as a result were literally deadly riots throughout the south. In November of 1963, fueled by a backlash against African-American voter registration drives in the Deep South and school desegregation efforts across the nation; the Ku Klux Klan was at its most powerful since the 1920s. For the first time, even churches offered no sanctuary, as they were targeted with a vengeance. In the 1960s, and at the time of the assassination, at least two Supreme Court Justices, Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justice Hugo Black, were tied to the KKK. Kennedy's civil rights stand, and his sending of federal troops to protect the first black student to enroll in the University of Alabama, was in fact declared an act of war by the Klan. Nor did it help that Kennedy was the first Catholic president the nation ever had: the KKK hates Catholics as much as it hates Jews and Blacks. To see a leaflet of what was expected from a member of the Klan, click here.
Also see Pope Leo XIII's Encyclical on Freemasonry of April 20, 1884. More on the long standing feud between the freemasons and the Catholics, as most evident in northern Ireland with the Orangemen freemasons and the Catholics. The Klan was founded by Scottish Rite freemasons.
New Page 5 UPDATE Jan 23, 2007: E. Howard Hunt Dead Convicted Watergate burglar, suspected "Third Tramp" in Dallas, and CIA operative E. Howard Hunt, 88, finally comes clean Â
Incidentally, you may be interested in the phone calls Johnson made to Washington Post columnist Joseph Alsop right after the assassination as efforts were made to create a truly independent commission.
Now, kind reader, this is no call for anarchy. This is a call for you to search your conscience. You know when you're being lied to by the press and broadcast media, and that it happens all the time. That doesn't mean you have to ignore their arrogance, their appeals for your silence is an appeal for your complicity in treason, in murder. Do not be silent, question the lie and the brotherhood of corruption that peddles it, as this your civic duty. A particular American, a war hero, was murdered in cold blood, in front of women and children. What was left of his body was deliberately mutilated to prevent forensic examination, and witnesses to his murder were intimidated and silenced. Evidence was destroyed. Yet throughout this all, the obvious culprit was inescapable and known to authorities, as if the voice of the dead cried out for justice. This was our president, President John F. Kennedy. The men who gained from this murder are not all dead, some remain in power, such as Sen. Arlen Specter. But they are not the only ones alive, or the only ones protected by the establishment press.
What you can do, the very least you can do for your country, is avoid the complicity of silence that damns us all, and call the broadcast media and the press into account... Â
Sen. Arlen Specter's role? Protect Coup Lynchpin, V.P. Lyndon Johnson, and Brother Segregationist Masons implicated in the JFK AssassinationThe South's Masonic Segregationist Brotherhood Risks Civil War in 1963
These facts are self-evident: in 1963, much of American society still supported segregation, and it wasn't just the south. The militant branch of this element found a means to undermine recent Supreme Court rulings, particularly the desegregation of public schools, in masonic lodges throughout the country. This was especially so in the south, since Southern masonry included members in law enforcement, politicians, lawyers, judges, publishers, etc. There in the secrecy of the Brotherhood, hypocrites and pseudo-moderates whom publicly praised the popular civil rights movement were trying desperately to undermine it and its leaders inside the lodge. Those who found the thought of black children attending public schools and universities odious enough to risk civil war over it weren't just Anglo-Saxon bigots in the Craft, some were right-wing masonic Jewish leaders like Arlen Specter, the Worshipful Master of the Laws of Physics, whose own children- being white- never faced the same type of discrimination as blacks in America, whose own children were never turned away from public schools and universities. Indeed, in 1968, when King and All of them were white, conservative males and most of them so opposed to civil rights they would do anything in their power to secretly undermine federal law, starting at the local level and ending at the Supreme Court, where at least two Supreme Court Justices, Hugo Black and Chief Justice Earl Warren, had ties to the KKK but distanced themselves from the ideology long ago, giving us the same desegregation ruling their former kin were rioting over in the south. Because the KKK was implicated in the JFK assassination from the very beginning, Warren- as an ex-Klan leader in San Bernadino, California- had a conflict of interest in taking over the investigation, which was precisely why Johnson chose him. Warren had a duty to recuse himself from the case. He didn't. And what we got was a mockery of justice so obscene even Nixon called the Warren Commission "the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind." Worse, the true extent of the Klan's "Invisible Empire" in our executive, judicial and legislative branches of government was concealed for over 40 years, and this was due largely to segregationist and bigot press assets recruited into the same society. Some say it was the Mafia who killed JFK, some say it was the CIA and FBI, some say the Klan, and some say it was elements of the military. Before you miss the forest for the trees, stop a moment, and consider this: Not everyone could be in the FBI or CIA, not everyone could be a general, a Supreme Court Chief Justice, a network executive, a major publisher or a mob boss. But just about anyone in the all-white FBI, CIA, Supreme Court and Mafia of 1963 could be a member of the KKK. And many were, particularly Klansmen recruited in Masonic lodges. They were told desegregation was a Communist plot, and that it was their duty to "protect Southern heritage" or "defend America" against Communism by subverting federal rulings ordering the integration of schools. Civil Rights movement and its leaders was attacking Communism, Klan leaders claimed. In reality, and obvious to everyone else, they were attacking and subverting federal law. And in Johnson's case, the great majority of fellow masons in federal and local law enforcement were subservient to his degree, and had to bend to his whims, secretly subverting the law and often without explanation. In 1963, they numbered over five million in the US alone. Among those in the freemasonic societies were Klansmen. The Ku Klux Klan was simply another branch of freemasonry, and there are many branches of it with many names. For our purposes, "freemasons" will be defined as male, white-only secret societies who met in Masonic lodges consisting largely of segregationists, such as the Scottish Rite. In this massive secret "fraternity" of freemasons there were militant segregationists (Klansmen) whom were able to infiltrate the military and recruit members, and elect their own to high office, e.g. the Senate and Congress. The Klan is a Masonic society that even then was almost 100 years old, and it was its numbers which gave it the significance afforded it here... Segregationists Use Cold War to Discredit Civil Rights Movement as Communist, Provoke Invasion of CubaFBI director Hoover was one of many Masonic leaders of the time to claim that the Civil Rights movement was a Communist plot. Integration, he claimed, was introduced by the Commies to destroy America and it is no mystery that he secretly attempted to smear Martin Luther King as a Communist sympathizer. The CIA and FBI segregationists in the plot, knowing Kennedy would be mourned, also tried to pin the assassination on the Communists by creating a pro-Castro patsy in Lee Harvey Oswald. This was the element New Orleans DA Jim Garrison discovered:
The segregationists wanted a fellow mason as President, and Lyndon Johnson, as VP and as a mason, was in the position to make a coup possible. It would have been impossible otherwise, because if Johnson was true to Kennedy and his own office, there would have been no cover-up by federal authorities. Kennedy's limo wouldn't have been washed and refurbished, as Johnson ordered, destroying all evidence therein that pointed to multiple trajectories. Indeed, of all the missing evidence in the Kennedy assassination, most of it pertains to that which could be used to prove ballistic trajectories; that is, evidence that substantiated witness, film, analog and photographic evidence of multiple shooters. All such evidence, including Kennedy's brain, was in the hands of people hired by, and controlled by Johnson.
But he also knew that segregation would be key to uniting the segregationist conspirators in the CIA, FBI, military, etc. To call Johnson a bigot would be incorrect, he was not, but he did hate the Kennedys enough to lead him into a segregationist ambush in Dallas. Johnson, as a mason, was surrounded by segregationists, such as SR 33rd degree mason J. Edgar Hoover, and he used them to do his dirty work when it was convenient. He did, however, generally act independently once in power, making it clear to all that the segregationists he used in the coup that they would not dictate his agenda. Or did he? Despite signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and pushing for it, Johnson, was also the lynchpin in the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King. In the case of RFK, Johnson knew RFK was on to him, and should Robert Kennedy become president not only would he face justice but so would all those who helped him. As for King, then protesting fiercely against the Vietnam war, his assassination would not have been possible without Johnson's wink and nod. That is another story, however, to be covered later. The Rise of the Neo-Segregationist on "Liberal" and Conservative NetworksThose segregationists of the 60s are still highly visible figures thanks to network executives hoping to legitimize a neo-segregationist movement which has already eliminated every black senator and congressman from the GOP. Among them is "former" Klansman Pat Buchanan, a fierce segregationist and unabashed white supremacist, Sen. Trent Lott, Sen. Robert Byrd, etc. But these are just the obvious ones. Leaders who favored segregation, secretly, you don't know. They are in both parties, and the only thing you do know is that they are not just tacit fraternal brothers in silly aprons, they are married in spirit and intentions. They are network executives in CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, they are publishers, they are businessmen, lawyers, and judges. Their secret handshake is a big middle finger to you and the rule of law. If you don't believe it, ask yourself these simple questions: How is it that an extremist group, with a history of terrorism ranging from the murder of political leaders to the bombing of federal buildings and churches nationwide, can do so under the banner of "free speech"? How is it that a group which has plotted cyanide gas attacks against Americans as recently as 2003; how is it this group of extremist, anti-American terrorists can have each and every atrocity excused as "lone nut" activity far removed from the the group the "lone nut(s)" belonged to, a group which publicly threatened and promoted the same violence before it happened? How is it? One would think those in charge were sympathetic to, were members of, or once members of the same terrorist group. And one would be right. We are, of course, talking about the Klan. We are, of course, talking about a terrorist group whose violent activities are defended by BOTH parties as an innocent and harmless cross-burning, secret fraternal brotherhood exercising their free speech, a free speech unique in that it includes This can only be so if both parties have members whom tacitly endorse or excuse the activity of these fellow masons, and make no mistake, the Klan is a Masonic organization and always was. They meet in the lodge, when not out burning crosses, and though many masons in other secret orders who meet therein detest them, they are in denial about the actual number of neo-segregationists in the Brotherhood as a whole. Nor can they ignore the obvious as they hold their tongues, being oathbound to silence as a prerequisite to seeing the "light": powerful men in the highest levels of office, fellow masons, protect the Klan because secretly they share the same ideals, which if spoken aloud, would cost them their seats. Sen. Robert Byrd, a Klan recruiter and Democrat, for example, calls his own membership in the Klan a "youthful indiscretion" but if you think about it, it's a claim easily countered. If you ask Sen. Byrd, under oath, to testify against other Klansmen past and present, or answer yes or no as whether he was involved in, or even witnessed any Klan lynching or murder, you will have the true sum of his "remorse." The Democrats won't call him on it, because they know it will condemn them all. And the GOP won't call him on it because their party has even more extremists, and besides, both parties have members who meet in the same temple of secrecy. As for the Klan agenda, if the aforementioned supposition of Klan sympathy and membership in the highest levels of federal office is true, it follows there would be a parallel agenda from its members in both parties. And that, too, is there. Clearly there.
From the very beginning, the Klan agenda was one of terrorizing blacks and depriving them of their rights; formulating the Jim Crow laws that lasted well over 100 years, and waging war on Catholic immigrants, particularly Irish-Americans and their immigrant forebears. What do you see on the broadcast media and major print media today? On FOX? on CNN, ABC? etc. You see stories about white victimization, and poor and middle class whites whom are truly victimized, but not by those the media would have you think. Who placed the yoke on your backs, if not wealthy white CEOs trying to divert the attention of constituents from their own corporate misdeeds, from manipulating the price of oil to enrich election coffers, to price-gouging hurricane victims in Hurricane Katrina. Who killed your president in Dallas, and let loose over 40 years of darkness and confusion, if not the mason Johnson and the neo-segregationists crying wolf today? They point fingers at the nearest scapegoat lest you turn around and see the Washington cabals who would enslave Americans anew, but this time, the shackled will be black and white, Jew and Gentile, mason or "profane" (non-mason). The Pat Buchanans, the Rush Limbaughs and Ann Coulters of this self-styled elite, this ancient and accepted brotherhood of domesticated, blueblood carnies; literally carry on the work of their own segregationist idols who "stood up to the federal tyranny" of integration; idols who lined the You see attacks on immigrants, Muslim and Catholic (Hispanics in particular) with the same vitriol and ignorance of 100 years ago, with the same language you would find in Klan founder and Scottish Rite Sovereign Grand Commander Albert Pikee's Arkansas newspaper, this by the same group of pseudo-Christians who burn the cross to say it honors Jesus. The agenda is the same, and the Klan has become acceptable in "civilized" debate, thanks to FOX and CNN in particular. The broadcast and print media, in a democracy, are the eyes and ears of a nation. Without an objective media, committed to hard truth at any price, the nation is deaf, dumb and blind. As such, the people of this nation are helpless in protecting themselves against those who would destroy their rights. Masonic law now supersedes the Constitution but it does so by subversion, and no judge, lawyer, or public official who secretly honors Masonic law above the Constitution can be expected to protect your rights. Inasmuch as the Bill of Rights threatens the tacit rule of Masonic law, the Constitution will be attacked. And is it not so today? it follows that if your rights are an inconvenience to the establishment, they will use their assets in the press and broadcast media to tell you these Constitutional rights are bad for you, bad for the nation and a threat to your security, and that you wouldn't miss them anyway. Yet they themselves are the biggest threat of all to your liberty. They will pardon each and every Klan conspiracy because the link between the neo-segregationists in the Scottish Rite and Klan is one impossible to hide, and politicians in both parties would fall in scores. Literally. Those of you who believe them deserve the contempt they show for you behind your back. Now, it is perhaps understandable that the media remain silent in the face of evidence that condemns them, but they have gone far beyond that. All the networks, at one time or another, and sometimes concurrently, The illusion of consensus or fact is easily attained by a monopolized press. Only five CEOs now control everything you hear and see, and in 1963, it was three. In the 1960s, the Ku Klux Klan had led uprisings and riots which prompted federal troops to enter the south. Despite unchecked terrorism and political killings throughout the south, and Klan death threats which led to Kennedy's cancellation of a Miami visit on Nov 9, 1963; despite threats which outlined, in precise detail, the Dallas plot of Nov. 22 1963.... the Klan escaped scrutiny. Only five CEOs control what you read, see and hear.The widespread and affiliated agency, i.e. high-level Illuminist cabals President John Adams and Winston Churchill warned us about, has this to say about the press:
UPDATE SUMMARY
Let's have a long and objective look at the man who presently judges our Supreme Court judges. It's not a pretty picture. It is Arlen Specter, the hero of the Washington Post that promulgated the findings of the most discredited and corrupt murder investigation in American history- The Warren Commission, which even Nixon dismissed as "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind". It was created by the number one suspect in President Kennedy's assassination, vice president Lyndon Johnson, who would not be on the ticket in 1964, who was about to be prosecuted for the murder of Texas agricultural agent Henry Marshall in 1961. Among those who now concede Johnson was the lynchpin of this segregationist Masonic coup of 1963 is Barr McClellan, his personal lawyer. According to Johnson's mistress, Madeleine Brown, one of the Warren Commission members, director John J. McCloy (CIA), actually met with Johnson, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, Clyde Tolson, and Richard Nixon the night prior to the assassination. Nixon was also in Dallas on the day of the assassination. Here we have eyewitness, credible evidence the Warren Commission was formed before the assassination. Actually, we have had it since the 60s. But your friends at the Washington Post and similar news assets believes you don't need to know this. Or perhaps don't want to know this. In 1963, anti-Civil Rights, anti-Catholic segregationist Masons numbered over 5 million. Of these, many were in high office, particularly members of the Scottish Rite, whose members include segregationist Trent Lott, Fritz Hollings, Sen. Strom Thurmond and Sen. Robert Byrd, the latter a Democrat who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As you may recall, these segregationist masons had a presidential candidate in Alabama Gov. George Wallace, and at their disposal they had a terrorist branch called the Ku Klux Klan. Indeed, through the protection of the Scottish Rite, the Klan has acted with impunity in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. (The Scottish Rite, in fact, created the Klan soon after the Civil War.) Even SR member Sen. Byrd was a high level Klansmen, a Klan recruiter, a Kleagle. Nixon's speech writer, Pat Buchanan, was so fiercely segregationist and pro-Klan it became a White House joke. In 1963, at least two Supreme Court Justices, Hugo Black and Earl Warren, were members of the Klan. FBI records reveal that Chief Justice Warren, in fact, was a Klan leader in Bakersfield, CA. It was for this reason Johnson chose him to lead the Warren Commission, because the inherent conflict of interest would tie his hands. Exposing the Klan's role would expose his own past, hitherto concealed, and seriously threaten his right to remain on the Supreme Court on 14th Amendment grounds. The Klan, at the time, was reviled by most of the nation and even many in the South. Ironically, Warren had gone a long way in distancing himself from the Klan. In the 50s, it was his court that desegregated the schools in Brown vs. The Board of Education, a ruling which was the very thing the segregationists despised Kennedy for defending. Warren's spurious objective in protecting Johnson, some have noted, was to prevent a civil war between the segregationists and the rest of America. But if this were true, he would have exposed the Washington segregationist cabals that were willing to risk civil war, thereby negating their political influence as criminal conspiracy charges would be leveled on a scale unseen in American history. He didn't expose the cabals, however, because he was a member. Warren was Scottish Rite. Just like Johnson, J. Edgar Hoover, Allen Dulles, Gerald Ford, John J. McCloy, etc. That segregationist masons were a powerful force in Washington DC is without question, but they were also powerful outside of it. In the broadcast and print media, closet segregationist Masons were overwhelming. They owned the three major networks of the time- ABC, CBS, and NBC; and "liberal" papers like the Washington Post and the New York Times. As such, for advancement or sheer bootlicking, editors and broadcasters and were more than happy to print stories dismissing Johnson's possible role in the assassination, however obvious. Knowledge is Power. Use itNo one likes to think their own government is capable of such profound obscenities, much less that they have done it unchecked for so long. But ignoring the problem will give you the government you deserve. Maybe you think you have no power, but you do. You don't have to buy from GE, Disney, or Viacom, or any of the products advertised on their propaganda organs, e.g. NBC, CBS, and ABC. You choose to. You own stock in these companies, you don't have to accept CEOs bound by the Mason's cable-tow- you can unseat them. (Look what they did to Enron.) You have the power of the purse. To these men, you are the "profane" non-mason that number in the vast majority of Americans, and if not, you are the lower ranking masonic base of the feudal pyramid, appeased by secret perks and flattery, that will never advance to any degree beyond that of a muzzled servant; bound lifelong in servile obedience to masters known and unknown; for ends had you known from the beginning, you would recoil in horror and disgust. Like the Harlot on the Beast drunk with the blood of the saints and prophets, they believe you cannot touch them, that they will never know grief. They believe that they are a sovereign nation unto themselves, and their authority exceeds the Constitution's. But is this confidence truly warranted? Actually, it is anything but true. All of this immunity and power depends on your not knowing its true face, and now you know it. You have a trump card. You now know who they are. You know what they can do, and what they have done. And most of all, you know they are in power because you put them there, and now that you know at what cost, you can also remove them. Dems and GOP: Designed to Serve Same Ends- how and whyIf you are one to label yourself a liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican, the following should give you pause for thought. All scientific methodology depends on experiments that can be reproduced, and here is a test you can try for yourself. Is our press the greatest threat to our peace, education, and political integrity? The surest test of a monopolized or controlled media is an absence of true diversity. If you read the BBC news feeds, or Yahoo, or Google, they will often point to the same stories. The many papers linked within, as well, are going to point to AP, Reuters or UPI source feeds. That's why all of these news portals are basically carrying the same stories. Look at the left hand pane of this blog with the news feeds to Yahoo, Google, Reuters, AP. Notice how the same stories keep popping up? And usually, this stories are of little or no relevance to you because the primary purpose of the print and broadcast media is to distract, inflame or mislead the public. Informing you is incidental. John Quincy Adamss, in his Address to the People of Massachusetts, said of the Masonic presss:
Even in his time, it had become a threat. The role of the press in undermining republics or protecting the architects of tyranny can not be overstated here. One infamous protocol describing the means of their controlling the media rings so true as to bring a chill up your spine, particularly when you consider corporate cabals such as AOL-Time Warner ((CNN), Viacom (CBS), General Electric (NBC) or Disney (ABC):
If indeed, a cabal of criminals can buy up press assets of all possible complexions to direct your thinking into their own opinions, how can you tell if what you're reading now isn't propaganda too? Simple. They will all have this in common: if they cannot avoid discussing it altogether, they will avoid discussing freemasonry in a negative light. These are protocols written by masons, and the easiest way to determine the integrity of a newspaper or broadcast media is to see their reaction when questioned on the mere existence of a Masonic press. Like the mason's seal on the dollar bill, a Masonic press is self-evident. But unlike the seal, it is self-evident BY WHAT IS NOT SEEN. If they deny partisan, secret collusion amongst editors and broadcasters is rampant today, you know they cannot be trusted; either for the outright lie, journalistic incompetence or pure gullibility. If they deny its power or influence, you likewise know you have been lied to, because if there was no Masonic press, Lyndon Johnson would have been arrested the same day Kennedy was shot. Why? The Billy Sol Estes Affair would have dominated the news stories, because a grand jury was now hearing evidence that Johnson was responsible for the 1961 murder and cover-up of Texas federal agricultural agent Henry Marshall. Johnson would be suspect number one, particularly after he destroyed evidence in a presidential assassination by immediately ordering the president's limo washed and refurbished. Why did he do it? because that limo held key evidence- slugs and trajectories that pointed to multiple trajectories, and hence, multiple shooters. In the same protocols we read:
The Great Power, the Masonic Press, isn't a fantastic concept at all. It's here now, and it is the aforementioned handful of companies we know as So the question remains..........What is it about obstructing justice in a presidential assassination that makes Specter, as lead investigator in the Warren Commission, especially qualified to chair the Senate Judiciary panel that will grill Supreme Court judges? After all, that Johnson killed Kennedy is an open secret in Washington DC. They know that enough Americans know the truth about Johnson to represent a true threat, but as long as it's kept out of the news, they also know they won't have to answer for the silence that marks complicity. It is an open secret like the one that we can never win the drug war on a prohibition model that is always linked to massive spikes in organized crime and political corruption. I think the Washington Post owes us an answer to that. What makes Specter exceptionally qualified, as a man of no character, to judge men of superior character? Those of superior character qualifies just about 99% of the population, unless you also have blood on your hands and advanced your career in politics through it. Incidentally, you may be interested in the phone calls Johnson made to Washington Post columnist Joseph Alsop right after the assassination as efforts were made to create a truly independent commission. Dare we challenge the Post? Oh yes. Yes we do. Now, kind reader, this is no call for anarchy. This is a call for you, as a voter, to search your conscience. This particular American was murdered in cold blood, in front of women and children. He was a war hero, he was also our president. The men who gained from this murder are not all dead, some remain in power, some know all the players: for instance, former President Gerald Ford, a member of the Warren Commission whom is also Scottish Rite. Another is Sen. Arlen Specter. But they are not the only ones alive, or the only ones protected by the establishment press. You wouldn't vote for a murderer if you had the choice. You have that choice. The first step must be taken by Pennsylvania constituents. But it must be taken.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated on Sunday, 16 May 2010 15:55 |