Glenn Beck, Prove to Me Joseph Smith was a Prophet

"The book seems to be merely a prosy detail of imaginary history, with the Old Testament for a model; followed by a tedious plagiarism of the New Testament. The author labored to give his words and phrases the quaint, old-fashioned sound and structure of our King James's translation of the Scriptures; and the result is a mongrel--half modern glibness, and half ancient simplicity and gravity. The latter is awkward and constrained; the former natural, but grotesque by the contrast. Whenever he found his speech growing too modern--which was about every sentence or two--he ladled in a few such Scriptural phrases as "exceeding sore," "and it came to pass," etc., and made things satisfactory again. "And it came to pass" was his pet. If he had left that out, his Bible would have been only a pamphlet."

Mark Twain on Joseph Smith's Book of Mormon, in Roughing It, Chapter XVI.. For Twain's complete analysis, link here.

This is in response to the following MediaMatters headline: CNN's Beck to first-ever Muslim congressman: "'Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies' "

As long as we're sitting here trying to prove negatives, like whether or not a congressman is terrorist simply because he's Muslim, let's try proving a few negatives with Glenn Beck, a practicing Mormon.

Hey Glenn, Sir, prove to me that your prophet, Joseph Smith, was not a convicted fraud, an embezzler who dug up his own brother's corpse for a magic ritual and was tarred and feathered for passing phony currency;

Prove to me he was actually talked to angels, and not a hallucination, when he wrote his own bible, The Book of Mormon. And by the way, prove to me that the former criminal allegations are not what led to Smith's "religious persecution".

Prove to me that he translated those ancient golden plates he found in the forest in Palmyra, New York (which conveniently, no one but other freemasons ever saw). Prove to me that the magic stones of "Urim and Thummim" which he allegedly used to do this with existed as well, and prove to me that the fact neither the plates or stones survive, or were seen by anyone other than a handful of conspirators isn't compelling evidence of a fraud.

Prove to me that Mormonism was not the Scientology of the 19th century, and Joseph Smith was not a huckster and L. Ron Hubbard of the time.

Prove to me that the massacre of 120 white men, women and children at the Mountain Meadows Massacre does not reflect the true nature of your "religion". I emphasize white simply because the massacre of no other race brings as much revulsion to your particular audience.

Prove to me, since your "prophets" to this day excuse the massacre of American men, women and children in the name of Jesus Christ, that your cult is not terrorist at its core.

Prove to me that your present prophet is actually a prophet, and explain unto me the logic you appeal to when claiming this. If I have never fixed a car, and call myself a mechanic, does that make me a mechanic? If I have never cut hair, and call myself a barber, does that make me a barber? And if I have never prophesied, and never do, does that make me a prophet?

Other Stuff Glenn Can, if Possible, Prove... Prove to me, since your "prophet" to this day excuses the Mountain Meadows Massacre of 120 American men, women and children that; your cult is not terrorist. There is a verse in the Book of Mormon that justifies murder when the church teachings are opposed. It reads that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (1 Nephi 4:13) Prove to me that this secret "Nail of the Cross" handshake is not inspired by freemasonry. Prove to me that the DNA evidence discounting the heart of Mormonism should be disregarded as irrelevant. (Click image for link or go here)

Explain unto me, thou yammering Nephite anus- so wise in thine own eyes- just what do Mormons hope to accomplish by the practice of Baptisms for the Dead, wherein members in are baptized in proxy for the dead of other faiths, and this in a veritable masonic "Mormon" temple; without the latter's prior consent? Prove to me this not sorcery, namely spiritual and even demonic conjuration, condemned in the bible and often performed unwittingly by trusting members.

Prove to me, oh Brother Beck, that the claims of ex-Mormons are invalid despite the facts their accounts are easily verifiable and observed.

Challenge me, as I speak of what I know. For behold, it came to pass I used to be a Mormon, and I am man enough, though exceeding sore, to admit my folly.

But above all, prove to me you are not a racist, bigoted steaming pile of lodge shit as the evidence to this effect is overwhelming.

Oh wait. You cannot prove any of these charges are untrue, to me or anyone else, because if you could, surely you would have done so by now.

When Freemasonry Knocks on Your Door

The true face of freemasonry, actually, is most apparent in religions quite familiar to all of us: Mormonism and the Jehovas Witnesses. Both are considered cults and not without reason. Mormonism has a prophet that doesn't prophecy, the JWs have prophecy but never get it right; as they predicted the end of the world since 1914 and consistently get it wrong-- and then lie about it. Both are mentioned here because they were two religions specifically designed as a form of social control by non Christian founders.

The only so-called "Christian" religions that accept freemasonic leadership are Mormonism (Joseph Smith, York Rite mason), and the Jehovas Witnesses (Charles Taze Russell, Scottish Rite). Like Hitler's German Christian Church would do in 1933 by introducing an "official Christian Bible" with no Old Testament; both Mormonism and the JWs introduced their own "Bibles."

As a former Mormon, I can attest from experience the following will be difficult for many in the church to digest. The first thing one is taught as a member is not to question the prophet or teachers, because such questions are rooted in sinful pride.

The very lie that expelled man from the Garden of Eden is the very lie peddled as Christian doctrine by the Mormons-- the men can be as gods, provided they eat of the secularly forbidden fruit of Mormon doctrine.

The Bible tells us the devil deceived Adam and Eve by telling them eating the forbidden fruit will make them as God. Yet the Mormons teach us that everyone can be a god, provided they accept Mormon doctrine. Thus the words of the serpent in Eden come straight from the Mormon prophets themselves! Another heresy, for instance, is Baptism for the Dead, wherein Mormons baptize spirits by proxy into the Mormon church...without so much as informed consent. It's not a joke. They actually do this. It involves literal sorcery-- spiritual channeling, which is expressly condemned in the Bible. It's why the temples are secret, and open only to members who marry there or whenever Baptisms for the Dead performed.

TIME magazine, owned by a Scottish Rite publisher, praises Mormonism to the sky as the true Christian church. But is it only because no other Christian church dares to accept freemasons at the highest level of leadership? Even a TIME magazine cover story, "Kingdom Come", notes "The FBI and CIA, drawn by a seemingly incorruptible rectitude, have instituted Mormon recruitment plans." (August 4, 1997 Vol. 150 No. 5 ) The CIA Mormon recruitment plan should be of special concern, particularly when we consider Jonestown and the CIA mind control experiments that were moved from prisons and mental hospitals to the private sector; i.e., to religious cults.

Question is, do both agencies recruit Mormon agents to the point of openly discriminating against non Mormons? And since when is this legal?

The Most Correct Book of Any Book on Earth?

In The Book of Mormon's Introduction, Joseph Smith claims his work to be "the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion..." Note that. The keystone of the Christian faith is the Holy Bible. Thus, by definition, Mormonism is by no means a Christian faith, it is a Smithtian faith, and any attempt to call it Christianity is outright slander through Mormonism's inherent marriage to mythology.

The Book of Mormon is an account of Jesus' visit to the Americas, and his ministering to two peoples who continually warred, the Nephites (a light skinned people) and the Lamanites (a dark skinned people). These peoples, we now know, never existed. In fact, soon after the Book of Mormon was published, Smith was sued for plagiarism when it was discovered his book was based contemporary novel of the time. Yet the cult still flourished. However, the authenticity of the book would soon be challenged as archeologists discovered more and more about South America. They realized there is not one artifact in existence to verify the existence of either a Nephite or Lamanite people, but insurmountable evidence to discredit the hoax.

The time in which the Lamanites and Nephites supposedly existed was during the Mayan empire, 300 A.D. to 900 A.D. With the Mayas there's countless artifacts and temples still with us to attest to their existence, and their descendants are still with us today. But what of the Nephites and Lamanites? The Mayas make no mention of them, no mention of trade with these peoples, no mention of intermarriages or wars, no mention of them in their written or oral histories. Nothing. So now, believe it or not, the Mormons have changed their stance, and claim that these peoples "probably lived in Atlantis"!!! Yet, the Book of Mormon remains "the keystone" of the Mormon "Christian" religion.

The Role of the Prophet

The Prophet of the Mormons doesn't actually serve to prophecy. The Mormon Prophet serves one purpose and one purpose only: DECEPTION. For instance, whenever the Book of Mormon's countless inconsistencies are exposed, he miraculously has a vision from God, and makes the appropriate changes to the Mormon holy works and covers up the discrepancies. If not, the "prophecies" are generally church related and meaningless to outsiders, and not even actual prophecies, but mere church mandates. For instance, of some 112 revelations received by the first Prophet, Joseph Smith, 88 explicitly addressed fiscal matters. A prophet or accountant?

For "the most correct of any book on earth", as Smith put it, the Book of Mormon has since been revised, edited, and reinterpreted on what seems to be a monthly basis.

Mormon leaders in Salt Lake City, were and are all lily-white, and almost exclusively freemasons. As Martin short notes Inside the Brotherhood, "petty corruption becomes second nature to Masons, so that in the end they cannot see how corrupt it is."

The discrimination in Mormonism is something special. The Mormon church officially regarded Blacks as literal subhumans unworthy of holding even the lowliest church titles until 1978. Why? Mormons were taught, in effect, either that God discriminated against them because they were the offspring of Cain, or becuse they came from the Lamanites, or both. If you have a Book of Mormon handy, read the Book of Mormon, Chapter 5, verse 15:

The Lamanites, it says, "Shall be scattered, and shall become dark, a filthy and loathsome people, beyond the description of that which ever hath been amongst us..."

The Lamanites, in the eyes of the Mormon leaders in Utah, are the forefathers of today's Black and Latino population. And their descendants are treated accordingly. The Book of Mormon teaches that after a series of wars, the Lamanites, the dark skinned, "loathsome" people eventually came to destroy the Nephites, the mythical light skinned people in the Americas. When Prop. 187 supporters funneled cash from Utah to pass the measure in 1994, the hysteria then was that history was about to repeat itself, and that "the Lamanites were about to take over." And Utah, "Nephite" headquarters, would have none of that. Sad part is, neither the Lamanite or Nephite ever existed-- AND THE LEADERS KNOW IT. But we have a lucrative enterprise here, and greed keeps the cult alive. The leaders in Salt Lake City were alluding to a fairy tale to fuel a massive political engine. They were hating children for a myth.

And where did they get this history lesson of the ancient Americas? One day the church's founder, Joseph Smith, is alleged to have walked into the woods to ponder the true church. And he received a vision, and shortly thereafter, he found a magic breastplate and the golden plates containing the Book of Mormon. Smith claims these golden plates were "translated" with two magic stones in silver bows "festooned in a breastplate" called "Urim and and Thummim." The absurdity doesn't stop there, so he appends the claim with a little heresy...he actually claims that the Prophets of old, such as Elijah, Isaiah,or Daniel-- actually NEEDED this magical Mormon breastplate to prophecy. The golden plates? They were, conveniently, taken up by angels to test our faith.

But now that we can decipher the ancient tongues, and we know better. There was no white race to speak of in the New World before Columbus came. That's why the Spaniard's smallpox and other European diseases decimated the native North and South American populations before their weapons could. Their gene pool, after their being isolated for so long, was homogenized and made them susceptible to foreign diseases.

The Incas, the Maya, or the Aztecs never used swords in battle-- they used clubs. Yet the Book of Mormon makes continual allusions to swords and other such weapons found only in the Old World.

Supposedly, some of the last genocidal wars between the mythical Lamanites and Nephites took place shortly after 375 A.D., when known native North and South American civilizations were flourishing. But unlike the case with the real civilizations noted here; there is not one reference, not one artifact or monument which exists that can be linked to either the Lamanites or Nephites. We have only the word of Joseph Smith-- a freemason bound to no Christian religion, a convicted fraud and a known necromancer who dug up up his own brother for a magic ritual.

Why the Emphasis on the Mormon Sect?

"In 1993 the church capped a harsh campaign of intellectual purification against dozens of feminists and dissidents with the excommunication of D. Michael Quinn, a leading historian whose painstaking work documented Smith's involvement with the occult and church leaders' misrepresentation of some continued polygamy in the early 1900s."

TIME, "Kingdom Come" Aug. 4, 1997

There is, unfortunately, good reason to be wary of the Mormon sect. There is a verse in the Book of Mormon that justifies murder when the church teachings are opposed. It reads that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." And some men, with or without consent of the church, will from time to time take it upon themselves to save us from our disbelief by slaying the one man, be it a religious or political leader. So when the CIA institutes plans for Mormon recruitment, two realities should come to mind-- the devout Mormon recruit will have:

1. Tolerance of freemasonic favoritism, secrecy and unquestioning collusion. The Mormons are not opposed to masonic secrecy and in fact practice it in the temples; and as such, once initiated into any branch of freemasonry, such as the Scottish Rite or York Rite, they can be trusted to maintain secrets of non masons within the CIA-- without the condemnation of the church for such masonic affiliations. It matters not that the very un-Christian deeds their silence and collusion perpetuates includes political assassinations and other forms of high level corruption, treason included.

2. A special susceptibility to "messianic martyr" mind control-- much like we see in the suicide bombers in the middle east. The threat that the CIA, or any intelligence agency for that matter, can more easily manipulate Mormon agents to commit even murder is a real one. One need only convince a devout Mormon agent that his faith is being threatened by a target agenda, party, or political figure. And then it's just a matter of reinforcing a key Mormon doctrine written in the first pages of the Book of Mormon, which is a book, if you recall, that above the Bible itself is the "keystone" of the Mormon religion. The belief in question is that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (See 1 Nephi, 4:13.)

The Most Convincing Proof of the Mormon Fraud? Just Read the Book

Even the countless footnotes in the Book of Mormon, when compared to the Biblical scriptures that they are supposed to buttress, don't even supplement or relate to the text in question! No wonder they're distributed alone, without a Bible to compare the verses.

Book of Mormon

1 Nephi 4:13 "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief."

Alleged Biblical Foundations/Parallels to 1 Nephi 4:13

Psalms 139:19: Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men

Deuteronomy 12:29: When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land...

Numbers 25:16-17: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:

For instance, Nephi 4:13 is compared to Numbers 25:17, Deuteronomy 12:29, and Psalms 139:19. Lets run by each one.

Psalms 139:19: Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men

Here King David appeals to God in verse that He slay his enemies-- "bloody men." Or murderers. Yet murder, in Christian pretext, is precisely what is prescribed in the Book of Mormon in 1 Nephi 4:13! "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (But can you imagine what would happen if the Israelites actually tried to jkill off every other faith but theirs?)

Deuteronomy 12:29: When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land..

Now compare it to this:"It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." Now how does 1 Nephi 4:13 supplement, parallel, or vindicate itself through Deuteronomy 12:29?

Numbers 25:16-17: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:

Let us keep in mind that the Lord addressed Moses. He did not address Joseph Smith with this command, and moreover, the Lord did not imply the Medianites could be interpreted to mean anyone the Mormon finds a threat to their faith. Yet this Biblical verse, too, is supposed to buttress 1 Nephi 4:13: "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief."

Playing with Fire

Mormon leaders say their book is a supplement to the Holy Bible and contains no contradictions, but the Bible consistently warns against false prophets or adding to the scriptures; particularly in Revelations 22: 18-19.

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

"And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

Where does Mormonism stand? They have added unto the words of John's prophecy the words of Joseph Smith, a prophet that never prophesied. A "prophet" that wrote the Book of Mormon as an "improvement" upon, and in practice a replacement of the Holy Scriptures. And in so doing, Smith took away from the words of prophecy. The Mormon missionary never gives away free Bibles with the Book of Mormon. If it's a supplement, it a curious way to prove it. They don't do it because on the chance you don't have a Bible, you won't see the bold faced fraud before you. Smith grievously polluted the sacred texts for personal gain and aggrandizement. And he knew what he was doing, as do the prophecy free prophets that are in charge of the this "church" today.

The Bible is a book of prophecies made and fulfilled. To understand the nature of true prophecy, chillingly accurate and unambiguous to the layman, you read sample scriptures in Part 3.

Joseph Smith, contrary to popular belief, was never crucified for you. He was not the Messiah which Isaiah prophesied of. Smith never walked on water, healed the sick, returned from the dead, nor ascended to heaven-- and to treat him as though he did truly demeans Christ's majesty. Smith's visions came from magic rocks he named Urim and Thummim, they did not come from God. And the Bible says nothing of baptisms for, of all things, the dead! It must be stressed that many Mormons are good and well-meaning people, and some of the kindest and noble you'll ever meet. But it doesn't make a false prophet a real one.

A Limp Simp In his June 26, 2006, statement below, Rush explains why the illegal cache of Viagra he was nailed with was not in his name, given "the potential embarrassing nature" of Viagra. Seen here in a picture laden with homo-erotic Freudian symbolism, i.e.; the prolonged and orgasmic sucking on an obvious phallic object like a large hot stogie, Rush's latent tendencies may include anything but erectile dysfunction. Evidence suggests that he's not terminally flaccid and impotent, just micro-endowed, and that the whole erectile dysfunction claim is a political ruse.

It wasn't too long ago that Rush was arrested at customs for carrying Viagra without a prescription. This was in Palm Beach International Airport, Florida, June 26th of 2006, and the incident made national headlines.

As most of you know, Viagra is a drug to treat erectile dysfunction. In fact, men who had been impotent for many years suddenly found their sex lives had returned to them. As such, it is very easy to presume taking Viagra equates with being impotent.

But just because Rush was caught with an illegal cache of Viagra doesn't mean he has a bum pecker. If we are to believe the few women who admit to sleeping with him, his legendary micro-pecker is easily confused for flaccid when erect, so he may be called impotent when he really is not. He's just, shall we say... eh... a very small man.

However, discerning minds soon realize that Rush is faking erectile dysfunction for effect, much like the orgasms he fakes by spitting on Sean Hannity's back...

More coming soon. Stay tuned.

"If I were one of these sickos I'd be nervous..."

Disgraced Florida Congressman Mark Foley

"What looked like a financial swindle soon exploded into a hideous tale of drugs, Iran-Contra money-laundering, a nationwide child abuse ring, and ritual murder. Nineteen months later, the legislative committee's chief investigator died- suddenly, and violently, like more than a dozen other people linked to the Franklin case."

Sen. John DeCamp

"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly American criminal class except Congress."

Mark Twain

Has this happened before? Hmmm.

Recall the Franklin Cover-Up. The British documentary, "Conspiracy of Silence" made a disturbing case about the sexual abuse, rape and torture of young children in the highest corridors of office. It was slated to air on the Discovery Channel on May 4, 1994, but never did. The rights were bought to the documentary, by unknown parties, and almost all copies destroyed. It was a cover-up no less disturbing than the one a cabal of Democrats and Republicans orchestrated in the Mena scandal.

The tape has never been broadcast, but it lives on in the net, with one grainy copy still circulating.

What can be said for sure is that all parties implicated in the scandal are, like it or not, "naughty" masons with a "respected" and ready means for conspiracy, a powerful and established international network of lodges especially suited for the subversion of federal and local investigations of protected members.

I mean, how hard can it be to call a secret meeting at the preferred lodge, and therein ask Brother Network Broadcast Executive, Brother Federal Judge, and Brother Newspaper Publisher to downplay a scandal affecting one of the members, appealing to the Masonic omerta and the sacred oath of fraternal succor at any cost? How hard can it be to call up a dog-eared playbook calling for members to unite in the tacit silencing and slander of witnesses, through the press or through violence? how hard can it be for such a secret society of self-interested men to orchestrate the creation of mock investigative committees, wherein they can appoint their own members as we saw in the Warren Commission?

What can be said for sure is that all parties implicated in the Foley scandal are, like it or not, Democrats and Republicans, members of the same lodges, fraternities, cabals; in short, secret fraternities of political influence ripe for precisely this type of corruption, since Masonic law presumes to supersede the Constitution, and if you see the way its members in the broadcast media, print media, Congress and the Senate treat the Bill of Rights today, you know which law they're truly bound to.

If the Foley Scandal unearths more of the same, let us hope the arm of justice deals evenly with the guilty, regardless of party. Do not think for one second only the Republicans are implicated. They may, in fact, be the most egregious violators of the public trust and may have freely dabbled, until now, in the same kind of child molestation that would land the "profane" or common man in prison for life. But to say this criminality is unique to the GOP is absurdly partisan, and it is not a cry that seeks justice but political objectives at the expense of justice. Let us avoid this cruel and inane vanity. If corrupt members from both parties unite secretly for bipartisan criminal agendas, does this make the crime- or concealment thereof- less criminal? Of course not.

Crime and Hypocrisy So Prevalent on the Hill the Good Are Ostracized

Criminality and unaccountability never was unique, to either party. However, it was and is unique to cabals, to secret societies whose mantra you may be familiar with now. The concept is this, and it comes in many guises, be it Luciferian, agnostic, atheist, etc....

God needs the devil, therefore the devil is good.

or...

Evil is necessary because without it we do not know what good is.

There is a serious problem with this philosophy, one that was the governing "light" in the philosophy and teachings of Washington's revered Scottish Rite mason, Klan Judicial Officer and Confederate General Albert Pike.

First of all, you do not need to be shot in the face or be gang-raped to know that this is probably naughty, or evil. The rational know that since it would be unpleasant to them, it would be unpleasant to others, and hence, most refrain from such evil. That is, unless they are sadists...or, perhaps, they believe that God needs the devil, and the devil is therefore good, or that evil is necessary to know good.

Those who bring evil to others will reap evil, not good. Now, if we follow Pike's shit-for-brains 19th century philosophy,

Good should be rewarded with evil, as evil is necessary to know and appreciate good.

See the absurdity?

Inasmuch as a party member, blue or red, pertains to the secret societies that encourage and conceal this activity, you will see more of the same.

Are you hungry? hungry for the endless propaganda bukkake FOX News unloads on viewers every day? If so, read no further. Why spoil your appetite?

True, FOX News is not the only network that regularly ejaculates an infected load of propaganda on to the faces of unwary viewers, nay, it is not by far. In fact, CNN hired psy-op specialists to work in their newsroom to perfect the literal brainwashing we call the cable news today. ABC, CBS, NBC have all done it and still do. However, the internet has made them vulnerable to accountability whenever they try it now....

But with FOX News, here we have a true exception, a true state media organ with a claim to journalism so flaccid and impotent even high school papers eclipse their professionalism and integrity.

Witness the video above.

On at least three different occasions, Bill O'Reilly's "No Spin Zone" spun a twisted web of lies so transparent my immediate indignation and pity soon turned into laughter. O'Reilly, you see, identified Republican Mark Foley as a Democrat, knowing full well Foley is a Republican, as his last few shows correctly identified him as a Republican and defended him on those grounds... that is, until more pages came forward and more emails and IM messages surfaced. O'Reilly sees the text and graphics on studio monitors the second they come up, he cannot say it was an oversight an blame it on an underling, but he assuredly will. The deception was intentional, and it becomes obvious by the number of times the "error" was repeated and their length of time. Most telling, however, was the clip where a former page is interviewed, clearly the most damning piece on Mark Foley (R-FL). And as he gets into the revolting details, guess what graphics pop up? An image of the disgraced congressman and the following title: MARK FOLEY (D-FL).

"No Spin Zone" indeed. This was a clear attempt to mislead viewers into thinking that a Democrat solicited sex with an underage male page, and that a Democrat is at the heart of the scandal, yet protected by no less than Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert, whom is now facing calls to resign!

However stupid and gullible O'Reilly thinks his audience may be, it slipped his mind that his show is not the only one on FOX, or the only cable news channel covering the scandal. Nor can he expect this ploy to work unless his viewers can't read or don't.

What is certain is that FOX News takes pride in its bias, and excuses "right-wing" propaganda as an alternative to "liberal" propaganda, never seeing the idiocy and shame of this admission, ignoring the glaring fact that propaganda is not news, it is the exact opposite: it is fiction and disinformation parading as news to achieve political or military objectives.

Worst of all, it ignores the simple fact these actions are not only counter to the interests of the viewers, they can and do lead them to act against them.

Nancy Grace is the Devil (RM)

Polluting the pool of justice with a pungent cloud of moral impurities is nothing new for Nancy Grace; and this she usually does by pissing in the jury pool to deliberately prevent a fair trial; particularly in televised cases, not-so-subtly attacking the presumption of innocence our Bill of Rights affords all Americans, a right wisely placed there by the nation's forefathers.

That was bad. But now she has really outdone herself.

Those of you familiar with Grace may recall the story about her fiancée being murdered way back in 1979, and that this was, according to Grace, a crime which inspired her subsequent crusade for victim's rights, and a new super-hero costume. Super Cunt was born, however, in the bowels of a myth she created. So before you ring the Cunt phone in Grace's Cunt Cave for emergency exploitation and fake empathy, take her credibility with a grain of salt.

Indeed, Grace's inconsistencies regarding the murder of her fiancée were so numerous The New York Observer took her to account in "Did Nancy Grace, TV Crimebuster, Muddy Her Myth?"

Author Rebecca Dana notes the following:

"Because of what happened in Georgia, Ms. Grace has said over and over, she knows firsthand how the system favors hardened criminals over victims. It is the foundation of her judicial philosophy, her motivation in life, her casus belli.

"And much of it isn’t true...

"In an emotional phone interview ranging over the inconsistencies in her account, Ms. Grace said, “I have not researched the defendant. I have tried not to think about it.”

Ironic. Nancy skewered Melinda Duckett for exactly that- inconsistencies- the same behavior she herself exhibited in Dana's interview. However, in Nancy's case, the murder in question happened way back in 1979. Nancy had decades to recover enough sense to discuss the matter objectively, as she would expect others to.

Duckett barely had a day.

Even the Duckett family blames Grace for the suicide. But does this deter our valiant super-hero in the least? Nay! As Grace puts it, "truth is sometimes hard" and that point is valid. But this is what she calls "truth" and the means she must have used to find it:

Along with driving the mother of a missing child to suicide (a strange super-power, granted) our noble champion Super Cunt can also read minds. She can talk to the dead, and even obtain confessions from them. Yep. This shameless twat actually went on Good Morning America and announced that Melinda probably killed herself from the guilt of killing her little boy. In one fell swoop, CNN's Nancy Grace solved the mystery of the missing toddler, identified the culprit, the fate of the child, and behold, voiced the very thoughts and confession of Melinda after she committed suicide.

If she can speak to Melinda now, from beyond the grave, maybe Grace can ask her where the body is, if indeed, the child is dead?

This is far from unusual for her. Unethical conduct is the bread and butter of Nancy Grace, and it is surely the main reason CNN chose to hire her. Ethical conduct in the newsroom makes for poor ratings, perhaps?

The former prosecutor has been reprimanded for unethical conduct by appellate judges at least three times, with one noting:

"We conclude that the conduct of the prosecuting attorney in this case demonstrated her disregard of the notions of due process and fairness, and was inexcusable," Chief Justice Robert Benham. Carr v. State, 267 Ga. 701 (1997).

All of which is to say, in the civility to match the occasion and idiot in question: maybe it's due time to..

FIRE THE EVIL BITCH.

• More on this nasal imbecile here. May 3, 2005: CNN's Nancy Grace, a Former Georgia Prosecutor, Rapped by Federal Appeals Court a Third Time for Unethical Conduct

Imagine a system so foolproof that it is 100 percent impossible to fake the legitimacy of the voter. At the polls, in this pleasant scenario, there is no worry that any of the voters there are voting illegally. The latest bill we get from Congress will insure this, by requiring some form of ID that proves citizenship status before anyone is allowed to vote. How neat!

But will this prevent widespread voter fraud, the very reason the House bill was introduced? of course not. Why? one word: DIEBOLD.

Princeton researchers have already proven conclusively that not only is it possible to easily hack into a Diebold machine and rig elections, essentially eliminating any point in verification of voter legitimacy, but such a virus can spread to other machines, changing the results in countless others. Worse, the virus can erase any trace of itself once the damage is done.

If even the ballots of rightful voters will be subject to arbitrary reversals through such hacking, what we're seeing here isn't a genuine attempt to prevent fraud. It is a genuine attempt to conceal and enable fraud by ignoring the most dangerous and pressing cause of election fraud. The House bill is not wrong to require proof of citizenship, that's not the issue. The issue is the deliberate omission of the most critical problem of all, suggesting the entire bill is window dressing to conceal the most profound abuse of voter rights since Jim Crow.

If the voter was, metaphorically speaking, a patient with a severed artery, the bill is akin to a Robitussin prescription and the mandated denial of tourniquets in the name of saving the patient.

Jim Crow never had it so good. The Jim Crow of 2006 is not race based, however, the new, metropolitan Jim Crow targets all races and colors, all faiths. He is a green-supremacist, and that green is money.

Sure, every one who cast a vote under the proposed bill will be a legal voter, and all of them, even Anglo-Saxon, Republican and Protestant voters who love FOX News and Diebold machines aren't exempt; this year, your vote will probably be shit and favor the incumbent. Any script kiddie can infect a memory card, then load a virus into a Diebold machine and change the election results to favor left or right. (See video above for Princeton University demonstration of just how easy it is to hack a Diebold machine, and leave no trace, in under one minute.)

The placement of Diebold machines is irrelevant. It is just as easy for a leftist to hack it as a right-winger. This sobering lesson in Diebold's knack for electronic anarchy did not register in the minds of the authors of the House bill. The Diebold threat is a threat to all voters, both left and right, and by not addressing it the House either knows something about this particular hack that we don't, or it has truly demonstrated a staggering level of incompetence.

Why the GOP won't Address the Diebold Problem, Even if it Costs them in 2006

If we follow the patterns of history, this is what's going to happen. The Diebold machines will be hacked, particularly in close races, and the elections will be a mockery of voter rights. If the results favor the left, the right will pander to, and polarize xenophobes in their ranks by saying the election was corrupted by illegal voters, though they know the claim to be a grievous lie. They will not admit their machines were defective by design to skewer elections, and in this particular case the scheme backfired.

For the corrupt, inept and hateful, it's so much easier to blame scapegoats who cannot vote and don't (fearing deportation). Besides, admitting the problem they unleashed with Diebold also means that if they admit the machines skewered this election to favor the left, then maybe they were also skewered in 2004. The investigations into their own backyard would be inevitable, and assuredly damning, because if that were not the case the last thing they'd be doing now is defending a machine that could easily, by electronic fraud, cost them their seats the moment opponents realize the results could be skewered either way.