If you had any doubt lawmakers had to sign a loyalty oath to Israel, and this in an open embrace of treason, follow the events regarding their outrage on NSA spying on Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. The truth is, the NSA would have been derelict in their duty had they not spied on Netanyahu. We are talking about a highly narcissistic, unstable and impulsive leader whose death count exceeds Recep Erdogan’s by thousands, and whose murders include an unspeakable amount of Americans. This is not an assertion made lightly, it is not hyperbole, and it is a claim that welcomes scrutiny.
We are talking about a man who actually made a thinly veiled threat on Obama’s life in a Grassy Knoll reference, and this even before trying to undermine an international Iranian peace agreement. As for the loyalty oath, watch Rubio and his ilk as an example of how emasculated neocons, Dems and Republicans alike, defend the complete surrender of American sovereignty to a foreign power, Israel, using Jesus as an excuse. It is an open embrace of treason you only see in someone so familiar with hypocrisy they are immune to its stench.
This is what Netanyahu said:
“When there are pressures on Israel to concede its security, the easiest thing to do is to concede. You get a round of applause, ceremonies on grassy knolls, and then come the missiles and the tunnels.”
Bibi, who spent many years in the United States, is surely cognizant of what his “grassy knoll” reference connotes. You can argue it was just an infelicitous phrase, or that Bibi was referring to himself, not Obama. Maybe so. But what if, say, an Iranian official, even a low-ranking one, had said such a thing? The uproar would be deafening. And so the question must be asked: was Bibi threatening the President of the United States?
What is certain is that for fanatical Zionists in America, Grassy Knoll means only one thing…
Kill the US President if He Won’t Bend a Knee to Israel
“Three, give a go-ahead for US-based MOSSAD agents to take out a president unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice-president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.”
One of the most brutal, and well-earned grillings you will ever hear. Here’s Secret Service Director Julia Pierson explaining why they decided to stand down after agents had made it clear shots were fired at the White House and numerous security breaches.
This exactly what we saw in the case of the Kennedy assassination, when after Vice-President Lyndon Johnson took power, we had an administration so “friendly” to Israel we had a president willing to cover up an Israeli attack on an American ship that killed 34 men (USS Liberty). Johnson, of course, was suspected by Sen. Robert F. Kennedy to be a key figure in his brother’s assassination, with RFK even asking point blank in this photo “Why did you have my brother killed?“
“Atlanta, GA – The owner of a Jewish newspaper in Atlanta has said he deeply regrets writing a column suggesting that Israel consider “a hit” on Barack Obama if he stands in the way of the Jewish state defending itself….” or as the publisher writes : “Three, give a go-ahead for US-based MOSSAD agents to take out a president unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice-president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies. Yes, you heard “three’ correctly. Order a hit on the president in order to preserve Israel’s existence.”
The underlying belief here is that the United States is obligated to preserve Israel’s existence before its own, and that we must assassinate or allow the assassination of ANY president who disagrees with Israeli foreign policy. So in answer to the question “What Would You Do?” I would arrest this publisher for treason or at the the very least, deport him to Israel.
Adler’s push for US-based MOSSAD agents to kill the president isn’t based on fiction. Nor is his idea original, as in Tel Aviv, when Netanyahu is said to have floated the idea after Obama recognized HAMAS. The MOSSAD is defining saturation, with unchecked espionage to keep our leaders in check.
What is truly repugnant is that every Republican presidential candidate shares the view of this publisher: Israeli sovereignty over American foreign policy and purse strings is a duty, but their spin is to do it because Jesus said so. Hillary’s spin is ostensibly because “Israel is the only democracy in the middle east” but in fact, it is because she is tied to Haim Saban, a Mossad agent and AIPAC media titan bankrolling her campaign.
That said, this should make it clear why she is so concerned about keeping her illegal private server emails secret. As the Secretary of State, use of secured government servers were important precisely for the fact; so the government knew of any serious ethical breaches or unofficial financial or state transactions. But maybe bribery and treason, the selling of state secrets with ill-begotten money funneled into the Clinton Foundation, isn’t a big deal to Team Hillary.
Should she take heart that treason and bribery has become a badge of honor for Netanyahu’s deflowered goy toys in the GOP? Witness rug-burned sycophants like Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz (both pawns to serve as proxy Bushes in states controlled by the Bush family, Florida and Texas, respectively).
“The suspected Israeli agent was inferred (it was the opinion of Josh Marshall and Ron Kampeas) to be Haim Saban, the giant contributor to the Democratic Party. So a ‘suspected Israeli agent’ is also a giant Democratic funder with influence over the Congress?”
|Israel and Its Lobby Lose the Iran Deal All over Again, in News of Damning Wiretaps|
|By James North and Philip Weiss
Global Research, January 01, 2016
Mondoweiss 1 December 2015
|Url of this article:
You’d think that there would be widespread outrage over the story everyone’s talking about today, the Wall Street Journal scoop that the Obama administration spied on Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu during the Iran Deal negotiations so as to counter his efforts to sink it. The wiretaps reveal that Israeli officials were up to their necks in the US political process; they “coordinated talking points with Jewish-American groups against the deal; and asked undecided lawmakers what it would take to win their votes, according to current and former officials familiar with the intercepts.”
The president approved the wiretaps.
That’s right; there’s a compelling national interest in stopping the Israel lobby.
Many have said that President Obama lacks spine? Well, it sure looks like the leak to reporters Adam Entous and Danny Yadron came from the administration, and it’s hard to believe that a leak of this magnitude was not approved by the president. Just when the Israel lobby thought that it was starting to get back to business as usual, the Obama administration has reminded them that something has fundamentally changed in the U.S.-Israel relationship. Not only did we beat the lobby and Israel on the Iran Deal, but: we’re exposing your tactics, and patriotic Americans are going to be very upset by what they see.
Remember that Obama in his highlight moment of the Iran Deal told Americans it would be an “abrogation of my constitutional duty” to defer to Israel’s interests on the Iran Deal. You’d think it would be a scandal that the Israeli PM was intriguing with Republicans — and surely some Democrats– in the way the WSJ has documented; but instead the official reaction is likely to be how outrageous it was for Obama and the NSA to be listening in on the supposed only democracy in the Middle East.
Some of the details from the article:
Much of the article substantiates the allegations swirling at the time of the deal, that Netanyahu was getting inside information on the secret negotiations. The eavesdropping revealed to the White House:
The notorious Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer was caught on the tapes:
Again, no names of US legislators, but this article contains the explicit threat that Israel could expose individuals down the road. The practice is sure to anger Americans and drive an even deeper wedge into the Jewish community over the role of the lobby. Patriotic Jewish Americans are going to be embarrassed yet again by the extent to which Israel tries to subvert our government, using American Jewish friends to do so. And many will walk away from the lobby over this kind of business. The large wavering middle of pro-Israel forces is going to be set back. J Street made the right call on the Iran Deal (reluctantly, I’ve heard) but it will reap a dividend.
Notre Dame professor Michael Desch’s interpretation: “The lobby and Congress will no doubt try to spin it as more evidence of Obama’s anti-Israel animus. But the story constitutes powerful evidence of 1) divergence of US and Israeli interests on important issues like Iran and 2) close coordination of the lobby and Government of Israel in trying to influence US domestic politics.”
Scott Horton refers to the last big eavesdropping scandal, when then-congresswoman Jane Harman promised a suspected Israeli agent that she would attempt to stop a federal case against American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) staffers in exchange for that agent’s political influence in getting her a committee chair. Jeff Stein reported the story:
Rep. Jane Harman, the California Democrat with a longtime involvement in intelligence issues, was overheard on an NSA wiretap telling a suspected Israeli agent that she would lobby the Justice Department to reduce espionage-related charges against two officials of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, the most powerful pro-Israel organization in Washington.
Harman was recorded saying she would “waddle into” the AIPAC case “if you think it’ll make a difference,” according to two former senior national security officials familiar with the NSA transcript.
In exchange for Harman’s help, the sources said, the suspected Israeli agent pledged to help lobby Nancy Pelosi , D-Calif., then-House minority leader, to appoint Harman chair of the Intelligence Committee after the 2006 elections, which the Democrats were heavily favored to win.
The suspected Israeli agent was inferred (it was the opinion of Josh Marshall and Ron Kampeas) to be Haim Saban, the giant contributor to the Democratic Party. So a “suspected Israeli agent” is also a giant Democratic funder with influence over the Congress? We’re headed for a showdown between the lobby and the grassroots, inside the Democratic Party. And praise to the Obama administration, who we guess is fueling the controversy out of “compelling national” interest.