Glenn Beck, Prove to Me Joseph Smith was a Prophet

"The book seems to be merely a prosy detail of imaginary history, with the Old Testament for a model; followed by a tedious plagiarism of the New Testament. The author labored to give his words and phrases the quaint, old-fashioned sound and structure of our King James's translation of the Scriptures; and the result is a mongrel--half modern glibness, and half ancient simplicity and gravity. The latter is awkward and constrained; the former natural, but grotesque by the contrast. Whenever he found his speech growing too modern--which was about every sentence or two--he ladled in a few such Scriptural phrases as "exceeding sore," "and it came to pass," etc., and made things satisfactory again. "And it came to pass" was his pet. If he had left that out, his Bible would have been only a pamphlet."

Mark Twain on Joseph Smith's Book of Mormon, in Roughing It, Chapter XVI.. For Twain's complete analysis, link here.

This is in response to the following MediaMatters headline: CNN's Beck to first-ever Muslim congressman: "'Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies' "

As long as we're sitting here trying to prove negatives, like whether or not a congressman is terrorist simply because he's Muslim, let's try proving a few negatives with Glenn Beck, a practicing Mormon.

Hey Glenn, Sir, prove to me that your prophet, Joseph Smith, was not a convicted fraud, an embezzler who dug up his own brother's corpse for a magic ritual and was tarred and feathered for passing phony currency;

Prove to me he was actually talked to angels, and not a hallucination, when he wrote his own bible, The Book of Mormon. And by the way, prove to me that the former criminal allegations are not what led to Smith's "religious persecution".

Prove to me that he translated those ancient golden plates he found in the forest in Palmyra, New York (which conveniently, no one but other freemasons ever saw). Prove to me that the magic stones of "Urim and Thummim" which he allegedly used to do this with existed as well, and prove to me that the fact neither the plates or stones survive, or were seen by anyone other than a handful of conspirators isn't compelling evidence of a fraud.

Prove to me that Mormonism was not the Scientology of the 19th century, and Joseph Smith was not a huckster and L. Ron Hubbard of the time.

Prove to me that the massacre of 120 white men, women and children at the Mountain Meadows Massacre does not reflect the true nature of your "religion". I emphasize white simply because the massacre of no other race brings as much revulsion to your particular audience.

Prove to me, since your "prophets" to this day excuse the massacre of American men, women and children in the name of Jesus Christ, that your cult is not terrorist at its core.

Prove to me that your present prophet is actually a prophet, and explain unto me the logic you appeal to when claiming this. If I have never fixed a car, and call myself a mechanic, does that make me a mechanic? If I have never cut hair, and call myself a barber, does that make me a barber? And if I have never prophesied, and never do, does that make me a prophet?

Other Stuff Glenn Can, if Possible, Prove... Prove to me, since your "prophet" to this day excuses the Mountain Meadows Massacre of 120 American men, women and children that; your cult is not terrorist. There is a verse in the Book of Mormon that justifies murder when the church teachings are opposed. It reads that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (1 Nephi 4:13) Prove to me that this secret "Nail of the Cross" handshake is not inspired by freemasonry. Prove to me that the DNA evidence discounting the heart of Mormonism should be disregarded as irrelevant. (Click image for link or go here)

Explain unto me, thou yammering Nephite anus- so wise in thine own eyes- just what do Mormons hope to accomplish by the practice of Baptisms for the Dead, wherein members in are baptized in proxy for the dead of other faiths, and this in a veritable masonic "Mormon" temple; without the latter's prior consent? Prove to me this not sorcery, namely spiritual and even demonic conjuration, condemned in the bible and often performed unwittingly by trusting members.

Prove to me, oh Brother Beck, that the claims of ex-Mormons are invalid despite the facts their accounts are easily verifiable and observed.

Challenge me, as I speak of what I know. For behold, it came to pass I used to be a Mormon, and I am man enough, though exceeding sore, to admit my folly.

But above all, prove to me you are not a racist, bigoted steaming pile of lodge shit as the evidence to this effect is overwhelming.

Oh wait. You cannot prove any of these charges are untrue, to me or anyone else, because if you could, surely you would have done so by now.

When Freemasonry Knocks on Your Door

The true face of freemasonry, actually, is most apparent in religions quite familiar to all of us: Mormonism and the Jehovas Witnesses. Both are considered cults and not without reason. Mormonism has a prophet that doesn't prophecy, the JWs have prophecy but never get it right; as they predicted the end of the world since 1914 and consistently get it wrong-- and then lie about it. Both are mentioned here because they were two religions specifically designed as a form of social control by non Christian founders.

The only so-called "Christian" religions that accept freemasonic leadership are Mormonism (Joseph Smith, York Rite mason), and the Jehovas Witnesses (Charles Taze Russell, Scottish Rite). Like Hitler's German Christian Church would do in 1933 by introducing an "official Christian Bible" with no Old Testament; both Mormonism and the JWs introduced their own "Bibles."

As a former Mormon, I can attest from experience the following will be difficult for many in the church to digest. The first thing one is taught as a member is not to question the prophet or teachers, because such questions are rooted in sinful pride.

The very lie that expelled man from the Garden of Eden is the very lie peddled as Christian doctrine by the Mormons-- the men can be as gods, provided they eat of the secularly forbidden fruit of Mormon doctrine.

The Bible tells us the devil deceived Adam and Eve by telling them eating the forbidden fruit will make them as God. Yet the Mormons teach us that everyone can be a god, provided they accept Mormon doctrine. Thus the words of the serpent in Eden come straight from the Mormon prophets themselves! Another heresy, for instance, is Baptism for the Dead, wherein Mormons baptize spirits by proxy into the Mormon church...without so much as informed consent. It's not a joke. They actually do this. It involves literal sorcery-- spiritual channeling, which is expressly condemned in the Bible. It's why the temples are secret, and open only to members who marry there or whenever Baptisms for the Dead performed.

TIME magazine, owned by a Scottish Rite publisher, praises Mormonism to the sky as the true Christian church. But is it only because no other Christian church dares to accept freemasons at the highest level of leadership? Even a TIME magazine cover story, "Kingdom Come", notes "The FBI and CIA, drawn by a seemingly incorruptible rectitude, have instituted Mormon recruitment plans." (August 4, 1997 Vol. 150 No. 5 ) The CIA Mormon recruitment plan should be of special concern, particularly when we consider Jonestown and the CIA mind control experiments that were moved from prisons and mental hospitals to the private sector; i.e., to religious cults.

Question is, do both agencies recruit Mormon agents to the point of openly discriminating against non Mormons? And since when is this legal?

The Most Correct Book of Any Book on Earth?

In The Book of Mormon's Introduction, Joseph Smith claims his work to be "the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion..." Note that. The keystone of the Christian faith is the Holy Bible. Thus, by definition, Mormonism is by no means a Christian faith, it is a Smithtian faith, and any attempt to call it Christianity is outright slander through Mormonism's inherent marriage to mythology.

The Book of Mormon is an account of Jesus' visit to the Americas, and his ministering to two peoples who continually warred, the Nephites (a light skinned people) and the Lamanites (a dark skinned people). These peoples, we now know, never existed. In fact, soon after the Book of Mormon was published, Smith was sued for plagiarism when it was discovered his book was based contemporary novel of the time. Yet the cult still flourished. However, the authenticity of the book would soon be challenged as archeologists discovered more and more about South America. They realized there is not one artifact in existence to verify the existence of either a Nephite or Lamanite people, but insurmountable evidence to discredit the hoax.

The time in which the Lamanites and Nephites supposedly existed was during the Mayan empire, 300 A.D. to 900 A.D. With the Mayas there's countless artifacts and temples still with us to attest to their existence, and their descendants are still with us today. But what of the Nephites and Lamanites? The Mayas make no mention of them, no mention of trade with these peoples, no mention of intermarriages or wars, no mention of them in their written or oral histories. Nothing. So now, believe it or not, the Mormons have changed their stance, and claim that these peoples "probably lived in Atlantis"!!! Yet, the Book of Mormon remains "the keystone" of the Mormon "Christian" religion.

The Role of the Prophet

The Prophet of the Mormons doesn't actually serve to prophecy. The Mormon Prophet serves one purpose and one purpose only: DECEPTION. For instance, whenever the Book of Mormon's countless inconsistencies are exposed, he miraculously has a vision from God, and makes the appropriate changes to the Mormon holy works and covers up the discrepancies. If not, the "prophecies" are generally church related and meaningless to outsiders, and not even actual prophecies, but mere church mandates. For instance, of some 112 revelations received by the first Prophet, Joseph Smith, 88 explicitly addressed fiscal matters. A prophet or accountant?

For "the most correct of any book on earth", as Smith put it, the Book of Mormon has since been revised, edited, and reinterpreted on what seems to be a monthly basis.

Mormon leaders in Salt Lake City, were and are all lily-white, and almost exclusively freemasons. As Martin short notes Inside the Brotherhood, "petty corruption becomes second nature to Masons, so that in the end they cannot see how corrupt it is."

The discrimination in Mormonism is something special. The Mormon church officially regarded Blacks as literal subhumans unworthy of holding even the lowliest church titles until 1978. Why? Mormons were taught, in effect, either that God discriminated against them because they were the offspring of Cain, or becuse they came from the Lamanites, or both. If you have a Book of Mormon handy, read the Book of Mormon, Chapter 5, verse 15:

The Lamanites, it says, "Shall be scattered, and shall become dark, a filthy and loathsome people, beyond the description of that which ever hath been amongst us..."

The Lamanites, in the eyes of the Mormon leaders in Utah, are the forefathers of today's Black and Latino population. And their descendants are treated accordingly. The Book of Mormon teaches that after a series of wars, the Lamanites, the dark skinned, "loathsome" people eventually came to destroy the Nephites, the mythical light skinned people in the Americas. When Prop. 187 supporters funneled cash from Utah to pass the measure in 1994, the hysteria then was that history was about to repeat itself, and that "the Lamanites were about to take over." And Utah, "Nephite" headquarters, would have none of that. Sad part is, neither the Lamanite or Nephite ever existed-- AND THE LEADERS KNOW IT. But we have a lucrative enterprise here, and greed keeps the cult alive. The leaders in Salt Lake City were alluding to a fairy tale to fuel a massive political engine. They were hating children for a myth.

And where did they get this history lesson of the ancient Americas? One day the church's founder, Joseph Smith, is alleged to have walked into the woods to ponder the true church. And he received a vision, and shortly thereafter, he found a magic breastplate and the golden plates containing the Book of Mormon. Smith claims these golden plates were "translated" with two magic stones in silver bows "festooned in a breastplate" called "Urim and and Thummim." The absurdity doesn't stop there, so he appends the claim with a little heresy...he actually claims that the Prophets of old, such as Elijah, Isaiah,or Daniel-- actually NEEDED this magical Mormon breastplate to prophecy. The golden plates? They were, conveniently, taken up by angels to test our faith.

But now that we can decipher the ancient tongues, and we know better. There was no white race to speak of in the New World before Columbus came. That's why the Spaniard's smallpox and other European diseases decimated the native North and South American populations before their weapons could. Their gene pool, after their being isolated for so long, was homogenized and made them susceptible to foreign diseases.

The Incas, the Maya, or the Aztecs never used swords in battle-- they used clubs. Yet the Book of Mormon makes continual allusions to swords and other such weapons found only in the Old World.

Supposedly, some of the last genocidal wars between the mythical Lamanites and Nephites took place shortly after 375 A.D., when known native North and South American civilizations were flourishing. But unlike the case with the real civilizations noted here; there is not one reference, not one artifact or monument which exists that can be linked to either the Lamanites or Nephites. We have only the word of Joseph Smith-- a freemason bound to no Christian religion, a convicted fraud and a known necromancer who dug up up his own brother for a magic ritual.

Why the Emphasis on the Mormon Sect?

"In 1993 the church capped a harsh campaign of intellectual purification against dozens of feminists and dissidents with the excommunication of D. Michael Quinn, a leading historian whose painstaking work documented Smith's involvement with the occult and church leaders' misrepresentation of some continued polygamy in the early 1900s."

TIME, "Kingdom Come" Aug. 4, 1997

There is, unfortunately, good reason to be wary of the Mormon sect. There is a verse in the Book of Mormon that justifies murder when the church teachings are opposed. It reads that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." And some men, with or without consent of the church, will from time to time take it upon themselves to save us from our disbelief by slaying the one man, be it a religious or political leader. So when the CIA institutes plans for Mormon recruitment, two realities should come to mind-- the devout Mormon recruit will have:

1. Tolerance of freemasonic favoritism, secrecy and unquestioning collusion. The Mormons are not opposed to masonic secrecy and in fact practice it in the temples; and as such, once initiated into any branch of freemasonry, such as the Scottish Rite or York Rite, they can be trusted to maintain secrets of non masons within the CIA-- without the condemnation of the church for such masonic affiliations. It matters not that the very un-Christian deeds their silence and collusion perpetuates includes political assassinations and other forms of high level corruption, treason included.

2. A special susceptibility to "messianic martyr" mind control-- much like we see in the suicide bombers in the middle east. The threat that the CIA, or any intelligence agency for that matter, can more easily manipulate Mormon agents to commit even murder is a real one. One need only convince a devout Mormon agent that his faith is being threatened by a target agenda, party, or political figure. And then it's just a matter of reinforcing a key Mormon doctrine written in the first pages of the Book of Mormon, which is a book, if you recall, that above the Bible itself is the "keystone" of the Mormon religion. The belief in question is that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (See 1 Nephi, 4:13.)

The Most Convincing Proof of the Mormon Fraud? Just Read the Book

Even the countless footnotes in the Book of Mormon, when compared to the Biblical scriptures that they are supposed to buttress, don't even supplement or relate to the text in question! No wonder they're distributed alone, without a Bible to compare the verses.

Book of Mormon

1 Nephi 4:13 "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief."

Alleged Biblical Foundations/Parallels to 1 Nephi 4:13

Psalms 139:19: Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men

Deuteronomy 12:29: When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land...

Numbers 25:16-17: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:

For instance, Nephi 4:13 is compared to Numbers 25:17, Deuteronomy 12:29, and Psalms 139:19. Lets run by each one.

Psalms 139:19: Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men

Here King David appeals to God in verse that He slay his enemies-- "bloody men." Or murderers. Yet murder, in Christian pretext, is precisely what is prescribed in the Book of Mormon in 1 Nephi 4:13! "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (But can you imagine what would happen if the Israelites actually tried to jkill off every other faith but theirs?)

Deuteronomy 12:29: When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land..

Now compare it to this:"It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." Now how does 1 Nephi 4:13 supplement, parallel, or vindicate itself through Deuteronomy 12:29?

Numbers 25:16-17: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:

Let us keep in mind that the Lord addressed Moses. He did not address Joseph Smith with this command, and moreover, the Lord did not imply the Medianites could be interpreted to mean anyone the Mormon finds a threat to their faith. Yet this Biblical verse, too, is supposed to buttress 1 Nephi 4:13: "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief."

Playing with Fire

Mormon leaders say their book is a supplement to the Holy Bible and contains no contradictions, but the Bible consistently warns against false prophets or adding to the scriptures; particularly in Revelations 22: 18-19.

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

"And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

Where does Mormonism stand? They have added unto the words of John's prophecy the words of Joseph Smith, a prophet that never prophesied. A "prophet" that wrote the Book of Mormon as an "improvement" upon, and in practice a replacement of the Holy Scriptures. And in so doing, Smith took away from the words of prophecy. The Mormon missionary never gives away free Bibles with the Book of Mormon. If it's a supplement, it a curious way to prove it. They don't do it because on the chance you don't have a Bible, you won't see the bold faced fraud before you. Smith grievously polluted the sacred texts for personal gain and aggrandizement. And he knew what he was doing, as do the prophecy free prophets that are in charge of the this "church" today.

The Bible is a book of prophecies made and fulfilled. To understand the nature of true prophecy, chillingly accurate and unambiguous to the layman, you read sample scriptures in Part 3.

Joseph Smith, contrary to popular belief, was never crucified for you. He was not the Messiah which Isaiah prophesied of. Smith never walked on water, healed the sick, returned from the dead, nor ascended to heaven-- and to treat him as though he did truly demeans Christ's majesty. Smith's visions came from magic rocks he named Urim and Thummim, they did not come from God. And the Bible says nothing of baptisms for, of all things, the dead! It must be stressed that many Mormons are good and well-meaning people, and some of the kindest and noble you'll ever meet. But it doesn't make a false prophet a real one.

A Limp Simp In his June 26, 2006, statement below, Rush explains why the illegal cache of Viagra he was nailed with was not in his name, given "the potential embarrassing nature" of Viagra. Seen here in a picture laden with homo-erotic Freudian symbolism, i.e.; the prolonged and orgasmic sucking on an obvious phallic object like a large hot stogie, Rush's latent tendencies may include anything but erectile dysfunction. Evidence suggests that he's not terminally flaccid and impotent, just micro-endowed, and that the whole erectile dysfunction claim is a political ruse.

It wasn't too long ago that Rush was arrested at customs for carrying Viagra without a prescription. This was in Palm Beach International Airport, Florida, June 26th of 2006, and the incident made national headlines.

As most of you know, Viagra is a drug to treat erectile dysfunction. In fact, men who had been impotent for many years suddenly found their sex lives had returned to them. As such, it is very easy to presume taking Viagra equates with being impotent.

But just because Rush was caught with an illegal cache of Viagra doesn't mean he has a bum pecker. If we are to believe the few women who admit to sleeping with him, his legendary micro-pecker is easily confused for flaccid when erect, so he may be called impotent when he really is not. He's just, shall we say... eh... a very small man.

However, discerning minds soon realize that Rush is faking erectile dysfunction for effect, much like the orgasms he fakes by spitting on Sean Hannity's back...

More coming soon. Stay tuned.

"If I were one of these sickos I'd be nervous..."

Disgraced Florida Congressman Mark Foley

"What looked like a financial swindle soon exploded into a hideous tale of drugs, Iran-Contra money-laundering, a nationwide child abuse ring, and ritual murder. Nineteen months later, the legislative committee's chief investigator died- suddenly, and violently, like more than a dozen other people linked to the Franklin case."

Sen. John DeCamp

"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly American criminal class except Congress."

Mark Twain

Has this happened before? Hmmm.

Recall the Franklin Cover-Up. The British documentary, "Conspiracy of Silence" made a disturbing case about the sexual abuse, rape and torture of young children in the highest corridors of office. It was slated to air on the Discovery Channel on May 4, 1994, but never did. The rights were bought to the documentary, by unknown parties, and almost all copies destroyed. It was a cover-up no less disturbing than the one a cabal of Democrats and Republicans orchestrated in the Mena scandal.

The tape has never been broadcast, but it lives on in the net, with one grainy copy still circulating.

What can be said for sure is that all parties implicated in the scandal are, like it or not, "naughty" masons with a "respected" and ready means for conspiracy, a powerful and established international network of lodges especially suited for the subversion of federal and local investigations of protected members.

I mean, how hard can it be to call a secret meeting at the preferred lodge, and therein ask Brother Network Broadcast Executive, Brother Federal Judge, and Brother Newspaper Publisher to downplay a scandal affecting one of the members, appealing to the Masonic omerta and the sacred oath of fraternal succor at any cost? How hard can it be to call up a dog-eared playbook calling for members to unite in the tacit silencing and slander of witnesses, through the press or through violence? how hard can it be for such a secret society of self-interested men to orchestrate the creation of mock investigative committees, wherein they can appoint their own members as we saw in the Warren Commission?

What can be said for sure is that all parties implicated in the Foley scandal are, like it or not, Democrats and Republicans, members of the same lodges, fraternities, cabals; in short, secret fraternities of political influence ripe for precisely this type of corruption, since Masonic law presumes to supersede the Constitution, and if you see the way its members in the broadcast media, print media, Congress and the Senate treat the Bill of Rights today, you know which law they're truly bound to.

If the Foley Scandal unearths more of the same, let us hope the arm of justice deals evenly with the guilty, regardless of party. Do not think for one second only the Republicans are implicated. They may, in fact, be the most egregious violators of the public trust and may have freely dabbled, until now, in the same kind of child molestation that would land the "profane" or common man in prison for life. But to say this criminality is unique to the GOP is absurdly partisan, and it is not a cry that seeks justice but political objectives at the expense of justice. Let us avoid this cruel and inane vanity. If corrupt members from both parties unite secretly for bipartisan criminal agendas, does this make the crime- or concealment thereof- less criminal? Of course not.

Crime and Hypocrisy So Prevalent on the Hill the Good Are Ostracized

Criminality and unaccountability never was unique, to either party. However, it was and is unique to cabals, to secret societies whose mantra you may be familiar with now. The concept is this, and it comes in many guises, be it Luciferian, agnostic, atheist, etc....

God needs the devil, therefore the devil is good.

or...

Evil is necessary because without it we do not know what good is.

There is a serious problem with this philosophy, one that was the governing "light" in the philosophy and teachings of Washington's revered Scottish Rite mason, Klan Judicial Officer and Confederate General Albert Pike.

First of all, you do not need to be shot in the face or be gang-raped to know that this is probably naughty, or evil. The rational know that since it would be unpleasant to them, it would be unpleasant to others, and hence, most refrain from such evil. That is, unless they are sadists...or, perhaps, they believe that God needs the devil, and the devil is therefore good, or that evil is necessary to know good.

Those who bring evil to others will reap evil, not good. Now, if we follow Pike's shit-for-brains 19th century philosophy,

Good should be rewarded with evil, as evil is necessary to know and appreciate good.

See the absurdity?

Inasmuch as a party member, blue or red, pertains to the secret societies that encourage and conceal this activity, you will see more of the same.

Are you hungry? hungry for the endless propaganda bukkake FOX News unloads on viewers every day? If so, read no further. Why spoil your appetite?

True, FOX News is not the only network that regularly ejaculates an infected load of propaganda on to the faces of unwary viewers, nay, it is not by far. In fact, CNN hired psy-op specialists to work in their newsroom to perfect the literal brainwashing we call the cable news today. ABC, CBS, NBC have all done it and still do. However, the internet has made them vulnerable to accountability whenever they try it now....

But with FOX News, here we have a true exception, a true state media organ with a claim to journalism so flaccid and impotent even high school papers eclipse their professionalism and integrity.

Witness the video above.

On at least three different occasions, Bill O'Reilly's "No Spin Zone" spun a twisted web of lies so transparent my immediate indignation and pity soon turned into laughter. O'Reilly, you see, identified Republican Mark Foley as a Democrat, knowing full well Foley is a Republican, as his last few shows correctly identified him as a Republican and defended him on those grounds... that is, until more pages came forward and more emails and IM messages surfaced. O'Reilly sees the text and graphics on studio monitors the second they come up, he cannot say it was an oversight an blame it on an underling, but he assuredly will. The deception was intentional, and it becomes obvious by the number of times the "error" was repeated and their length of time. Most telling, however, was the clip where a former page is interviewed, clearly the most damning piece on Mark Foley (R-FL). And as he gets into the revolting details, guess what graphics pop up? An image of the disgraced congressman and the following title: MARK FOLEY (D-FL).

"No Spin Zone" indeed. This was a clear attempt to mislead viewers into thinking that a Democrat solicited sex with an underage male page, and that a Democrat is at the heart of the scandal, yet protected by no less than Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert, whom is now facing calls to resign!

However stupid and gullible O'Reilly thinks his audience may be, it slipped his mind that his show is not the only one on FOX, or the only cable news channel covering the scandal. Nor can he expect this ploy to work unless his viewers can't read or don't.

What is certain is that FOX News takes pride in its bias, and excuses "right-wing" propaganda as an alternative to "liberal" propaganda, never seeing the idiocy and shame of this admission, ignoring the glaring fact that propaganda is not news, it is the exact opposite: it is fiction and disinformation parading as news to achieve political or military objectives.

Worst of all, it ignores the simple fact these actions are not only counter to the interests of the viewers, they can and do lead them to act against them.

Nancy Grace is the Devil (RM)

Polluting the pool of justice with a pungent cloud of moral impurities is nothing new for Nancy Grace; and this she usually does by pissing in the jury pool to deliberately prevent a fair trial; particularly in televised cases, not-so-subtly attacking the presumption of innocence our Bill of Rights affords all Americans, a right wisely placed there by the nation's forefathers.

That was bad. But now she has really outdone herself.

Those of you familiar with Grace may recall the story about her fiancée being murdered way back in 1979, and that this was, according to Grace, a crime which inspired her subsequent crusade for victim's rights, and a new super-hero costume. Super Cunt was born, however, in the bowels of a myth she created. So before you ring the Cunt phone in Grace's Cunt Cave for emergency exploitation and fake empathy, take her credibility with a grain of salt.

Indeed, Grace's inconsistencies regarding the murder of her fiancée were so numerous The New York Observer took her to account in "Did Nancy Grace, TV Crimebuster, Muddy Her Myth?"

Author Rebecca Dana notes the following:

"Because of what happened in Georgia, Ms. Grace has said over and over, she knows firsthand how the system favors hardened criminals over victims. It is the foundation of her judicial philosophy, her motivation in life, her casus belli.

"And much of it isn’t true...

"In an emotional phone interview ranging over the inconsistencies in her account, Ms. Grace said, “I have not researched the defendant. I have tried not to think about it.”

Ironic. Nancy skewered Melinda Duckett for exactly that- inconsistencies- the same behavior she herself exhibited in Dana's interview. However, in Nancy's case, the murder in question happened way back in 1979. Nancy had decades to recover enough sense to discuss the matter objectively, as she would expect others to.

Duckett barely had a day.

Even the Duckett family blames Grace for the suicide. But does this deter our valiant super-hero in the least? Nay! As Grace puts it, "truth is sometimes hard" and that point is valid. But this is what she calls "truth" and the means she must have used to find it:

Along with driving the mother of a missing child to suicide (a strange super-power, granted) our noble champion Super Cunt can also read minds. She can talk to the dead, and even obtain confessions from them. Yep. This shameless twat actually went on Good Morning America and announced that Melinda probably killed herself from the guilt of killing her little boy. In one fell swoop, CNN's Nancy Grace solved the mystery of the missing toddler, identified the culprit, the fate of the child, and behold, voiced the very thoughts and confession of Melinda after she committed suicide.

If she can speak to Melinda now, from beyond the grave, maybe Grace can ask her where the body is, if indeed, the child is dead?

This is far from unusual for her. Unethical conduct is the bread and butter of Nancy Grace, and it is surely the main reason CNN chose to hire her. Ethical conduct in the newsroom makes for poor ratings, perhaps?

The former prosecutor has been reprimanded for unethical conduct by appellate judges at least three times, with one noting:

"We conclude that the conduct of the prosecuting attorney in this case demonstrated her disregard of the notions of due process and fairness, and was inexcusable," Chief Justice Robert Benham. Carr v. State, 267 Ga. 701 (1997).

All of which is to say, in the civility to match the occasion and idiot in question: maybe it's due time to..

FIRE THE EVIL BITCH.

• More on this nasal imbecile here. May 3, 2005: CNN's Nancy Grace, a Former Georgia Prosecutor, Rapped by Federal Appeals Court a Third Time for Unethical Conduct

Imagine a system so foolproof that it is 100 percent impossible to fake the legitimacy of the voter. At the polls, in this pleasant scenario, there is no worry that any of the voters there are voting illegally. The latest bill we get from Congress will insure this, by requiring some form of ID that proves citizenship status before anyone is allowed to vote. How neat!

But will this prevent widespread voter fraud, the very reason the House bill was introduced? of course not. Why? one word: DIEBOLD.

Princeton researchers have already proven conclusively that not only is it possible to easily hack into a Diebold machine and rig elections, essentially eliminating any point in verification of voter legitimacy, but such a virus can spread to other machines, changing the results in countless others. Worse, the virus can erase any trace of itself once the damage is done.

If even the ballots of rightful voters will be subject to arbitrary reversals through such hacking, what we're seeing here isn't a genuine attempt to prevent fraud. It is a genuine attempt to conceal and enable fraud by ignoring the most dangerous and pressing cause of election fraud. The House bill is not wrong to require proof of citizenship, that's not the issue. The issue is the deliberate omission of the most critical problem of all, suggesting the entire bill is window dressing to conceal the most profound abuse of voter rights since Jim Crow.

If the voter was, metaphorically speaking, a patient with a severed artery, the bill is akin to a Robitussin prescription and the mandated denial of tourniquets in the name of saving the patient.

Jim Crow never had it so good. The Jim Crow of 2006 is not race based, however, the new, metropolitan Jim Crow targets all races and colors, all faiths. He is a green-supremacist, and that green is money.

Sure, every one who cast a vote under the proposed bill will be a legal voter, and all of them, even Anglo-Saxon, Republican and Protestant voters who love FOX News and Diebold machines aren't exempt; this year, your vote will probably be shit and favor the incumbent. Any script kiddie can infect a memory card, then load a virus into a Diebold machine and change the election results to favor left or right. (See video above for Princeton University demonstration of just how easy it is to hack a Diebold machine, and leave no trace, in under one minute.)

The placement of Diebold machines is irrelevant. It is just as easy for a leftist to hack it as a right-winger. This sobering lesson in Diebold's knack for electronic anarchy did not register in the minds of the authors of the House bill. The Diebold threat is a threat to all voters, both left and right, and by not addressing it the House either knows something about this particular hack that we don't, or it has truly demonstrated a staggering level of incompetence.

Why the GOP won't Address the Diebold Problem, Even if it Costs them in 2006

If we follow the patterns of history, this is what's going to happen. The Diebold machines will be hacked, particularly in close races, and the elections will be a mockery of voter rights. If the results favor the left, the right will pander to, and polarize xenophobes in their ranks by saying the election was corrupted by illegal voters, though they know the claim to be a grievous lie. They will not admit their machines were defective by design to skewer elections, and in this particular case the scheme backfired.

For the corrupt, inept and hateful, it's so much easier to blame scapegoats who cannot vote and don't (fearing deportation). Besides, admitting the problem they unleashed with Diebold also means that if they admit the machines skewered this election to favor the left, then maybe they were also skewered in 2004. The investigations into their own backyard would be inevitable, and assuredly damning, because if that were not the case the last thing they'd be doing now is defending a machine that could easily, by electronic fraud, cost them their seats the moment opponents realize the results could be skewered either way.

The Klan's Lodge Recruitment Strategy Klan meeting in- you guessed it- a Masonic lodge, circa 1964. This is one reason secrecy and deception are the hallmark of the lodge then and today. Klansmen recruited in Masonic lodges. Masons were told desegregation was a Communist plot, and that it was their duty to "protect Southern heritage" or "defend America" against Communism by subverting federal rulings ordering the integration of schools. Attacking the Civil Rights movement and its leaders was attacking Communism, Klan leaders claimed. In reality,  and obvious to everyone else, they were attacking and subverting federal law. "At their annual meeting last June in Indianapolis, the Baptists also adopted a resolution against secret societies, which reads in part: 'we ... call upon all Christians to ... [avoid] any association which conflicts with clear Biblical ... teachings concerning the taking of oaths, the secrecy of activities, mystical knowledge, or racial discrimination'....Dr. James Holly of Beaumont, Texas, told me this [the Lutheran ban on joining freemasonry] was aimed at the known fact that white Freemasonry is affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan..." see Source Hoover and the Scottish Rite J. Edgar Hoover, former FBI Director and 33rd Scottish Rite segregationist mason. He hated the Kennedys and Martin Luther King, and was a key player in undermining all investigations into their assassinations. (see below) Nov. 9, 1963: The Klan Death Threats to JFK "Threat to assassinate President Kennedy in Dallas Texas, November 22, 1963..." A Nov 17, 1963 FBI telex details J. Edgar Hoover's cynical request to maintain updates through "logical racial hate group informants to determine if any basis for threat..." Once received, the warnings would be dutifully scrapped by Hoover, and these informants had a nasty tendency to pay dearly for their patriotic duty- their attempts to protect President Kennedy often cost them their lives. Note the reference to a planned assassination plot by a militant segregationist group [the Klan, White Citizens Council, et al], which had led to the cancellation of Kennedy's trip to Miami, Florida days earlier (below). FBI Tapes: The Klan in Florida and Dallas The Klan in the Dallas Police Dept. Nov. 22, 1963: Note the Klan patch on the left arm of the officer leading the infamous Three Tramps moments after the assassination (left to right: Frank Sturgis, Charles Harrison and Howard Hunt.) Louisiana Klan leader David Duke under the flag of the KKK, 1974. It was in New Orleans, Louisiana, where DA Jim Garrison's Clay Shaw Trial of 1967 would link Johnson to the obvious coup. President John Quincy Adams on the Masonic Press President John Quincy Adams, in his Address to the People of Massachusetts, said of the Masonic press: "I saw slander organize into a secret, widespread and affiliated agency.......I saw self-invoked imprecations of throats cut from ear to ear, of hearts and vitals torn out and cast off and hung on spires. I saw wine drunk from a human skull with solemn invocation of all the sins of its owner upon the head of him who drank it." A Warning Against Freemasonry Unheeded JFK address to newspaper publishers regarding secret societies, April 27, 1961.   "Some say it was the Mafia who killed JFK, some say it was the CIA and FBI, some say the Klan, and some say it was elements of the military. Before you miss the forest for the trees, stop a moment, and consider this: Not everyone could be in the FBI or CIA, not everyone could be a general, a Supreme Court Chief Justice, or a mob boss. But just about anyone in the all-white FBI, CIA, Supreme Court and Mafia of 1963 could be a member of the KKK. And many were, particularly Klansmen recruited in Masonic lodges."

The Segregationist Brotherhood Risks Civil War in 1963

Specter's role? Protect Coup Lynchpin, V.P. Lyndon Johnson, and Brother Segregationist Masons implicated in the JFK Assassination

These facts are self-evident: in 1963, much of American society still supported segregation, and it wasn't just the south. The militant branch of this element found a means to undermine recent Supreme Court rulings, particularly the desegregation of public schools, in masonic lodges throughout the country. This was especially so in the south, since Southern masonry included members in law enforcement, politicians, lawyers, judges, publishers, etc.

There in the secrecy of the Brotherhood, hypocrites and pseudo-moderates whom publicly praised the popular civil rights movement were trying desperately to undermine it and its leaders inside the lodge.

Those who found the thought of black children attending public schools and universities odious enough to risk civil war over it weren't just Anglo-Saxon bigots in the Craft, some were right-wing masonic Jewish leaders like Arlen Specter, the Worshipful Master of the Laws of Physics, whose own children- being white- never faced the same type of discrimination as blacks in America, whose own children were never turned away from public schools and universities. Indeed, in 1968, when King and RFK were assassinated, over 5 million Americans were segregationist freemasons, with both Gentile and to a smaller extent, Jewish members.

All of them were white, conservative males and most of them so opposed to civil rights they would do anything in their power to secretly undermine federal law, starting at the local level and ending at the Supreme Court, where at least two Supreme Court Justices, Hugo Black and Chief Justice Earl Warren, had ties to the KKK but distanced themselves from the ideology long ago, giving us the same desegregation ruling their former kin were rioting over in the south.

Because the KKK was implicated in the JFK assassination from the very beginning, Warren- as an ex-Klan leader in San Bernadino, California- had a conflict of interest in taking over the investigation, which was precisely why Johnson chose him. Warren had a duty to recuse himself from the case. He didn't. And what we got was a mockery of justice so obscene even Nixon called the Warren Commission "the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind." Worse, the true extent of the Klan's "Invisible Empire" in our executive, judicial and legislative branches of government was concealed for over 40 years, and this was due largely to segregationist and bigot press assets recruited into the same society.

Some say it was the Mafia who killed JFK, some say it was the CIA and FBI, some say the Klan, and some say it was elements of the military. Before you miss the forest for the trees, stop a moment, and consider this: Not everyone could be in the FBI or CIA, not everyone could be a general, a Supreme Court Chief Justice, a network executive, a major publisher or a mob boss. But just about anyone in the all-white FBI, CIA, Supreme Court and Mafia of 1963 could be a member of the KKK. And many were, particularly Klansmen recruited in Masonic lodges. They were told desegregation was a Communist plot, and that it was their duty to "protect Southern heritage" or "defend America" against Communism by subverting federal rulings ordering the integration of schools. Civil Rights movement and its leaders was attacking Communism, Klan leaders claimed. In reality,and obvious to everyone else, they were attacking and subverting federal law.

Tacit members, of course, in this segregationist "fraternity." The Klan was a Masonic society that even then was almost 100 years old, and it was its numbers which gave it the significance afforded it here..

Segregationists Use Cold War to Discredit Civil Rights Movement as Communist, Provoke Invasion of Cuba

FBI director Hoover was one of many Masonic leaders of the time to claim that the Civil Rights movement was a Communist plot. Integration, he claimed, was introduced by the Commies to destroy America and it is no mystery that he secretly attempted to smear Martin Luther King as a Communist sympathizer.

The CIA and FBI segregationists in the plot, knowing Kennedy would be mourned, also tried to pin the assassination on the Communists by creating a pro-Castro patsy in Lee Harvey Oswald. This was the element New Orleans DA Jim Garrison discovered: a segregationist plot to kill the president, blame Castro and use the public outcry to win support for an invasion of communist Cuba. This was, in fact, already a tactic in the CIA playbook:

"...a) The precision rifle. In guarded assassination, a good hunting or target rifle should always be considered as a possibility. Absolute reliability can nearly always be achieved at a distance of one hundred yards. In ideal circumstances, the range may be extended to 250 yards. Public figures or guarded officials may be killed with great reliability and some safety if a firing point can be established prior to an official occasion. The propaganda value of this system may be very high.... "

CIA Assassination Manual; Operation PB Success, 1954

The segregationists wanted a fellow mason as President, and Lyndon Johnson, as VP and as a mason, was in the position to make a coup possible. It would have been impossible otherwise, because if Johnson was true to Kennedy and his own office, there would have been no cover-up by federal authorities. Kennedy's limo wouldn't have been washed and refurbished, as Johnson ordered, destroying all evidence therein that pointed to multiple trajectories. Indeed, of all the missing evidence in the Kennedy assassination, most of it pertains to that which could be used to prove ballistic trajectories; that is, evidence that substantiated witness, film, analog and photographic evidence of multiple shooters. All such evidence, including Kennedy's brain, was in the hands of people hired by, and controlled by Johnson.

Johnson had motives rooted in self-preservation to volunteer for the coup, as he was already facing conspiracy and/or murder charges in Texas for the murder of agricultural agent Henry Marshall, and he knew Kennedy planned to drop him from the ticket in '64 for that very reason- his mafia ties and the uncovered Texas murder sprees.

But he also knew that segregation would be key to uniting the segregationist conspirators in the CIA, FBI, military, etc. To call Johnson a bigot would be incorrect, he was not, but he did hate the Kennedys enough to lead him into a segregationist ambush in Dallas. Johnson, as a mason, was surrounded by segregationists, such as SR 33rd degree mason J. Edgar Hoover, and he used them to do his dirty work when it was convenient. He did, however, generally act independently once in power, making it clear to all that the segregationists he used in the coup that they would not dictate his agenda. Or did he?

Despite signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and pushing for it, Johnson, was also the lynchpin in the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King. In the case of RFK, Johnson knew RFK was on to him, and should Robert Kennedy become president not only would he face justice but so would all those who helped him. As for King, then protesting fiercely against the Vietnam war, his assassination would not have been possible without Johnson's wink and nod. That is another story, however, to be covered later.

The Rise of the Neo-Segregationist on "Liberal" and Conservative Networks

Those segregationists of the 60s are still highly visible figures thanks to network executives hoping to legitimize a neo-segregationist movement which has already eliminated every black senator and congressman from the GOP. Among them is "former" Klansman Pat Buchanan, a fierce segregationist and unabashed white supremacist, Sen. Trent Lott, Sen. Robert Byrd, etc. But these are just the obvious ones. Leaders who favored segregation, secretly, you don't know. They are in both parties, and the only thing you do know is that they are not just tacit fraternal brothers in silly aprons, they are married in spirit and intentions. They are network executives in CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, they are publishers, they are businessmen, lawyers, and judges. Their secret handshake is a big middle finger to you and the rule of law.

If you don't believe it, ask yourself these simple questions:

How is it that an extremist group, with a history of terrorism ranging from the murder of political leaders to the bombing of federal buildings and churches nationwide, can do so under the banner of "free speech"?

How is it that a group which has plotted cyanide gas attacks against Americans as recently as 2003; how is it this group of extremist, anti-American terrorists can have each and every atrocity excused as "lone nut" activity far removed from the the group the "lone nut(s)" belonged to, a group which publicly threatened and promoted the same violence before it happened? How is it? One would think those in charge were sympathetic to, were members of, or once members of the same terrorist group. And one would be right.

We are, of course, talking about the Klan. We are, of course, talking about a terrorist group whose violent activities are defended by BOTH parties as an innocent and harmless cross-burning, secret fraternal brotherhood exercising their free speech, a free speech unique in that it includes a right to kill and terrorize Americans under the banner of the First Amendment.

This can only be so if both parties have members whom tacitly endorse or excuse the activity of these fellow masons, and make no mistake, the Klan is a Masonic organization and always was. They meet in the lodge, when not out burning crosses, and though many masons in other secret orders who meet therein detest them, they are in denial about the actual number of neo-segregationists in the Brotherhood as a whole.

Nor can they ignore the obvious as they hold their tongues, being oathbound to silence as a prerequisite to seeing the "light": powerful men in the highest levels of office, fellow masons, protect the Klan because secretly they share the same ideals, which if spoken aloud, would cost them their seats. Sen. Robert Byrd, a Klan recruiter and Democrat, for example, calls his own membership in the Klan a "youthful indiscretion" but if you think about it, it's a claim easily countered. If you ask Sen. Byrd, under oath, to testify against other Klansmen past and present, or answer yes or no as whether he was involved in, or even witnessed any Klan lynching or murder, you will have the true sum of his "remorse." The Democrats won't call him on it, because they know it will condemn them all. And the GOP won't call him on it because their party has even more extremists, and besides, both parties have members who meet in the same temple of secrecy.

As for the Klan agenda, if the aforementioned supposition of Klan sympathy and membership in the highest levels of federal office is true, it follows there would be a parallel agenda from its members in both parties. And that, too, is there. Clearly there.

From the very beginning, the Klan agenda was one of terrorizing blacks and depriving them of their rights; formulating the Jim Crow laws that lasted well over 100 years, and waging war on Catholic immigrants, particularly Irish-Americans and their immigrant forebears. What do you see on the broadcast media and major print media today? On FOX? on CNN, ABC? etc. You see stories about white victimization, and poor and middle class whites whom are truly victimized, but not by those the media would have you think. Who placed the yoke on your backs, if not wealthy white CEOs trying to divert the attention of constituents from their own corporate misdeeds, from manipulating the price of oil to enrich election coffers, to price-gouging hurricane victims in Hurricane Katrina. Who killed your president in Dallas, and let loose over 40 years of darkness and confusion, if not the mason Johnson and the neo-segregationists crying wolf today? They point fingers at the nearest scapegoat lest you turn around and see the Washington cabals who would enslave Americans anew, but this time, the shackled will be black and white, Jew and Gentile, mason or "profane" (non-mason).

The Pat Buchanans, the Rush Limbaughs and Ann Coulters of this self-styled elite, this ancient and accepted brotherhood of domesticated, blueblood carnies; literally carry on the work of their own segregationist idols who "stood up to the federal tyranny" of integration; idols who lined the Central High School with the Arkansas National Guard, that nine black school children be denied an education. These fascist mouthpieces are, by design, given air time to make segregation palatable to unwary audiences who never lived through it. Don't think for one second that a show which airs their hate-mongering imbecilities do not necessarily share their ideology, because the very reason they are invited on such shows is to make that ideology legitimate. This a textbook PSYOP targeting a domestic audience, and MSNBC, FOX, CNN, ABC the most grievous purveyors.

You see attacks on immigrants, Muslim and Catholic (Hispanics in particular) with the same vitriol and ignorance of 100 years ago, with the same language you would find in Klan founder and Scottish Rite Sovereign Grand Commander Albert Pikee's Arkansas newspaper, this by the same group of pseudo-Christians who burn the cross to say it honors Jesus. The agenda is the same, and the Klan has become acceptable in "civilized" debate, thanks to FOX and CNN in particular.

The broadcast and print media, in a democracy, are the eyes and ears of a nation. Without an objective media, committed to hard truth at any price, the nation is deaf, dumb and blind. As such, the people of this nation are helpless in protecting themselves against those who would destroy their rights. Masonic law now supersedes the Constitution but it does so by subversion, and no judge, lawyer, or public official who secretly honors Masonic law above the Constitution can be expected to protect your rights. Inasmuch as the Bill of Rights threatens the tacit rule of Masonic law, the Constitution will be attacked.

And is it not so today? it follows that if your rights are an inconvenience to the establishment, they will use their assets in the press and broadcast media to tell you these Constitutional rights are bad for you, bad for the nation and a threat to your security, and that you wouldn't miss them anyway. Yet they themselves are the biggest threat of all to your liberty. They will pardon each and every Klan conspiracy because the link between the neo-segregationists in the Scottish Rite and Klan is one impossible to hide, and politicians in both parties would fall in scores. Literally.

Those of you who believe them deserve the contempt they show for you behind your back.

Now, it is perhaps understandable that the media remain silent in the face of evidence that condemns them, but they have gone far beyond that. All the networks, at one time or another, and sometimes concurrently, attacked those who simply tried to tell the truth. And it is for this crime they will be held to account as the sleeping giant of public awareness finds the true extent of the criminal betrayal.

The illusion of consensus or fact is easily attained by a monopolized press. Only five CEOs now control everything you hear and see, and in 1963, it was three. In the 1960s, the Ku Klux Klan had led uprisings and riots which prompted federal troops to enter the south. Despite unchecked terrorism and political killings throughout the south, and Klan death threats which led to Kennedy's cancellation of a Miami visit on Nov 9, 1963; despite threats which outlined, in precise detail, the Dallas plot of Nov. 22 1963.... the Klan escaped scrutiny.

Only five CEOs control what you read, see and hear.

(PDF)

The widespread and affiliated agency, i.e. high-level Illuminist cabals President John Adams and Winston Churchill warned us about, has this to say about the press:

"What is the part played by the press today? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose or else it serves selfish ends of parties...Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies., in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.... All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions --aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical. . . Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will in fact follow the flag which we hang out for them..."

"Capital... must be free to establish a monopoly of industry and trade.... This freedom will give political force to those engaged in industry, and that will help to oppress the people."

UPDATE SUMMARY

More on the Warren Commission's Worshipful Master of the Laws of Physics.

The Spurious Threat of Civil War Cited by Johnson Apologists for the Concealment.

Who Gained by Helping Lyndon Johnson.

How the Washington Post Censors the News.

Let's have a long and objective look at the man who presently judges our Supreme Court judges. It's not a pretty picture. It is Arlen Specter, the hero of the Washington Post that promulgated the findings of the most discredited and corrupt murder investigation in American history- The Warren Commission, which even Nixon dismissed as "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind". It was created by the number one suspect in President Kennedy's assassination, vice president Lyndon Johnson, who would not be on the ticket in 1964, who was about to be prosecuted for the murder of Texas agricultural agent Henry Marshall in 1961. Among those who now concede Johnson was the lynchpin of this segregationist Masonic coup of 1963 is Barr McClellan, his personal lawyer.

According to Johnson's mistress, Madeleine Brown, one of the Warren Commission members, director John J. McCloy (CIA), actually met with Johnson, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, Clyde Tolson, and Richard Nixon the night prior to the assassination. Nixon was also in Dallas on the day of the assassination. Here we have eyewitness, credible evidence the Warren Commission was formed before the assassination. Actually, we have had it since the 60s. But your friends at the Washington Post and similar news assets believes you don't need to know this. Or perhaps don't want to know this.

In 1963, anti-Civil Rights, anti-Catholic segregationist Masons numbered over 5 million. Of these, many were in high office, particularly members of the Scottish Rite, whose members include segregationist Trent Lott, Fritz Hollings, Sen. Strom Thurmond and Sen. Robert Byrd, the latter a Democrat who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As you may recall, these segregationist masons had a presidential candidate in Alabama Gov. George Wallace, and at their disposal they had a terrorist branch called the Ku Klux Klan. Indeed, through the protection of the Scottish Rite, the Klan has acted with impunity in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. (The Scottish Rite, in fact, created the Klan soon after the Civil War.) Even SR member Sen. Byrd was a high level Klansmen, a Klan recruiter, a Kleagle. Nixon's speech writer, Pat Buchanan, was so fiercely segregationist and pro-Klan it became a White House joke.

In 1963, at least two Supreme Court Justices, Hugo Black and Earl Warren, were members of the Klan. FBI records reveal that Chief Justice Warren, in fact, was a Klan leader in Bakersfield, CA. It was for this reason Johnson chose him to lead the Warren Commission, because the inherent conflict of interest would tie his hands. Exposing the Klan's role would expose his own past, hitherto concealed, and seriously threaten his right to remain on the Supreme Court on 14th Amendment grounds. The Klan, at the time, was reviled by most of the nation and even many in the South. Ironically, Warren had gone a long way in distancing himself from the Klan. In the 50s, it was his court that desegregated the schools in Brown vs. The Board of Education, a ruling which was the very thing the segregationists despised Kennedy for defending.

Warren's spurious objective in protecting Johnson, some have noted, was to prevent a civil war between the segregationists and the rest of America. But if this were true, he would have exposed the Washington segregationist cabals that were willing to risk civil war, thereby negating their political influence as criminal conspiracy charges would be leveled on a scale unseen in American history.

He didn't expose the cabals, however, because he was a member. Warren was Scottish Rite. Just like Johnson, J. Edgar Hoover, Allen Dulles, Gerald Ford, John J. McCloy, etc.

That segregationist masons were a powerful force in Washington DC is without question, but they were also powerful outside of it. In the broadcast and print media, closet segregationist Masons were overwhelming. They owned the three major networks of the time- ABC, CBS, and NBC; and "liberal" papers like the Washington Post and the New York Times. As such, for advancement or sheer bootlicking, editors and broadcasters and were more than happy to print stories dismissing Johnson's possible role in the assassination, however obvious.

Knowledge is Power. Use it

No one likes to think their own government is capable of such profound obscenities, much less that they have done it unchecked for so long. But ignoring the problem will give you the government you deserve. Maybe you think you have no power, but you do.

You don't have to buy from GE, Disney, or Viacom, or any of the products advertised on their propaganda organs, e.g. NBC, CBS, and ABC. You choose to. You own stock in these companies, you don't have to accept CEOs bound by the Mason's cable-tow- you can unseat them. (Look what they did to Enron.) You have the power of the purse.

To these men, you are the "profane" non-mason that number in the vast majority of Americans, and if not, you are the lower ranking masonic base of the feudal pyramid, appeased by secret perks and flattery, that will never advance to any degree beyond that of a muzzled servant; bound lifelong in servile obedience to masters known and unknown; for ends had you known from the beginning, you would recoil in horror and disgust.

Like the Harlot on the Beast drunk with the blood of the saints and prophets, they believe you cannot touch them, that they will never know grief. They believe that they are a sovereign nation unto themselves, and their authority exceeds the Constitution's. But is this confidence truly warranted? Actually, it is anything but true. All of this immunity and power depends on your not knowing its true face, and now you know it.

You have a trump card.

You now know who they are. You know what they can do, and what they have done. And most of all, you know they are in power because you put them there, and now that you know at what cost, you can also remove them.

Dems and GOP: Designed to Serve Same Ends- how and why they unite to conceal the assassins...

If you are one to label yourself a liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican, the following should give you pause for thought. All scientific methodology depends on experiments that can be reproduced, and here is a test you can try for yourself. Is our press the greatest threat to our peace, education, and political integrity?

The surest test of a monopolized or controlled media is an absence of true diversity. If you read the BBC news feeds, or Yahoo, or Google, they will often point to the same stories. The many papers linked within, as well, are going to point to AP, Reuters or UPI source feeds. That's why all of these news portals are basically carrying the same stories. Look at the left hand pane of this blog with the news feeds to Yahoo, Google, Reuters, AP. Notice how the same stories keep popping up? And usually, this stories are of little or no relevance to you because the primary purpose of the print and broadcast media is to distract, inflame or mislead the public. Informing you is incidental.

Whether aired on conservative or "liberal" channels, racist neo-segregationists such as Pat Buchanan, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter are given airtime to make segregation palatable to unwary audiences who never lived through it. These pundits form a self-styled elite, spawned of an Ancient and Accepted Brotherhood of domesticated blueblood carnie rejects on a crusade to carry on the work of segregationist Masters. Idols like George Wallace, Strom Thurmond, etc., one of whom "stood up to the federal tyranny" of desegregation and lined Central High School with the Arkansas National Guard that nine black school children be denied an education (see above).

John Quincy Adams, in his Address to the People of Massachusetts, said of the Masonic press:

"I saw slander organize into a secret, widespread and affiliated agency..."

Even in his time, it had become a threat. The role of the press in undermining republics or protecting the architects of tyranny can not be overstated here. One infamous protocol describing the means of their controlling the media rings so true as to bring a chill up your spine, particularly when you consider corporate cabals such as AOL-Time Warner ((CNN), Viacom (CBS), General Electric (NBC) or Disney (ABC):

"What is the part played by the press today? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose or else it serves selfish ends of parties...

"Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them....

"All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions --aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical. . . Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will in fact follow the flag which we hang out for them...

"Thanks to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time may be required, to excite or to tranquillize the public mind on political questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now truth, now lies, facts or their contradictions, according as they may be well or ill received, always very cautiously feeling our ground before stepping upon it. . . We shall have a sure triumph over our opponents since they will not have at their disposition organs of the press in which they can give full and final expression to their views owing to the aforesaid methods of dealing with the press.

"Cases of the manifestation of criminality should remain known only to their victims and to chance witnesses -- no more."

If indeed, a cabal of criminals can buy up press assets of all possible complexions to direct your thinking into their own opinions, how can you tell if what you're reading now isn't propaganda too?

Simple. They will all have this in common: if they cannot avoid discussing it altogether, they will avoid discussing freemasonry in a negative light.

These are protocols written by masons, and the easiest way to determine the integrity of a newspaper or broadcast media is to see their reaction when questioned on the mere existence of a Masonic press. Like the mason's seal on the dollar bill, a Masonic press is self-evident. But unlike the seal, it is self-evident BY WHAT IS NOT SEEN. If they deny partisan, secret collusion amongst editors and broadcasters is rampant today, you know they cannot be trusted; either for the outright lie, journalistic incompetence or pure gullibility. If they deny its power or influence, you likewise know you have been lied to, because if there was no Masonic press, Lyndon Johnson would have been arrested the same day Kennedy was shot. Why? The Billy Sol Estes Affair would have dominated the news stories, because a grand jury was now hearing evidence that Johnson was responsible for the 1961 murder and cover-up of Texas federal agricultural agent Henry Marshall. Johnson would be suspect number one, particularly after he destroyed evidence in a presidential assassination by immediately ordering the president's limo washed and refurbished. Why did he do it? because that limo held key evidence- slugs and trajectories that pointed to multiple trajectories, and hence, multiple shooters.

In the same protocols we read: "We must compel...action in the direction favored by our widely-conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation, by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly prompted by us through the means of that so-called 'Great Power' -- the Press, which, with a few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands."

The Great Power, the Masonic Press, isn't a fantastic concept at all. It's here now, and it is the aforementioned handful of companies we know as mediaopolies.

So the question remains........

What is it about obstructing justice in a presidential assassination that makes Specter, as lead investigator in the Warren Commission, especially qualified to chair the Senate Judiciary panel that will grill Supreme Court judges? After all, that Johnson killed Kennedy is an open secret in Washington DC. They know that enough Americans know the truth about Johnson to represent a true threat, but as long as it's kept out of the news, they also know they won't have to answer for the silence that marks complicity. It is an open secret like the one that we can never win the drug war on a prohibition model that is always linked to massive spikes in organized crime and political corruption.

I think the Washington Post owes us an answer to that. What makes Specter exceptionally qualified, as a man of no character, to judge men of superior character? Those of superior character qualifies just about 99% of the population, unless you also have blood on your hands and advanced your career in politics through it.

Johnson calls the Washington Post

Dare we challenge the Post? Oh yes. Yes we do.

Now, kind reader, this is no call for anarchy. This is a call for you, as a voter, to search your conscience.

This particular American was murdered in cold blood, in front of women and children. He was a war hero, he was also our president.

The men who gained from this murder are not all dead, some remain in power, some know all the players: for instance, former President Gerald Ford, a member of the Warren Commission whom is also Scottish Rite. Another is Sen. Arlen Specter. But they are not the only ones alive, or the only ones protected by the establishment press.

You wouldn't vote for a murderer if you had the choice. You have that choice.

The first step must be taken by Pennsylvania constituents. But it must be taken.

• Continued

Sowing Hate, Sowing Fear A Nazi chart indicating the spread of Jewish influence and immigration, and a plot to take over Europe and the world. (see video clip above) This CNN chart to its right was supplied by the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC), a white-collar KKK front. Dobbs used it to promulgate actual Klan propaganda that Mexico is plotting a violent "re-conquest" of territories lost in the Mexican American war....presumably with an army of unarmed migrant farm workers. CNN Cites White Supremacist Group as Source Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks the Klan, reports on Lou Dobs Anti-Defamation League report on the CCC. Propaganda's Harvest Obedience See Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiment. Stanford Prison Experiment 24 college student volunteers are divided by a flip of the coin into prisoners and guards. In just a few days, the prisoners stop thinking of themselves as people but instead as numbers, and the "guards" stop treating the prisoners as human. For example, guards forced the "prisoners" to clean out their toilets with their bare hands. Psychologists have known for decades that any people can be led to commit horrendous atrocities if those acts are condoned or ordered by a perceived authority.

This is a clip from the Nazi propaganda film "Der Ewige Jude - The Eternal Jew".

Note the commentary by the propagandist towards the end of the clip as the camera closes in on a "criminal" Jewish face:

"These physiognomies immediately refute the liberal theories... about the equality of all who bear a human countenance."

The arguments against the Jew are amazingly similar to those proposed by FOX and Atlantas CNN against non-white immigrants, i.e., that their immigration to Europe destroyed the German economy, introduced disease, crime, etc. This documentary even blames them for introducing rats to Europe and uses bogus statistics to imply that the Jews are responsible for most of the crime in the world.

Against this backdrop of hateful and misleading narration, viewers are bombarded by constant repetition of negative imagery and stereotypes of Jews, much like FOX or CNN deliberately uses loops of unflattering images of border poverty and illicit border crossings to falsely imply an "alien invasion". This is, in fact, psychological warfare at its purest. The human brain is seven times more likely to recall a negative image than a positive one, and it is a fact not lost on the propagandist when attempting to make viewers act against their best interests or conscience.

The terms "invasion" and "liberal", incidentally, are also used generously in this film. The term "invasion" is used often in describing Jewish immigration and "liberal" is a term used derogatively in describing anyone who is sympathetic to the Jew.  The cry of "invasion" and the endless deprecation of the "liberal." Sound familiar?

After World War II, as it became obvious Nazi atrocities were made possible by years of calculated media indoctrination, the head of the German Press Division, Hans Fritzche, was successfully prosecuted as a war criminal by the US. An excerpt from the article describes the main charge- propaganda as an instrument of aggression:

" 'The use made by the Nazi conspirators of psychological warfare is well known. Before each major aggression, with some few exceptions based on expediency, they initiated a press campaign calculated to weaken their victims and to prepare the German people psychologically for the attack. They used the press, after their earlier conquests, as a means for further influencing foreign politics and in maneuvering for the following aggression.'”

Sprecher, US, Nuremburg prosecutor said this regarding Fritzsche, the Director of the German Press Division. (Fritzsche served 9 years hard labor after eventual conviction by a German court):

"For the correct definition of the role of defendant Hans Fritzsche it is necessary, firstly, to keep clearly in mind the importance attached by Hitler...to propaganda in general and to radio propaganda in particular. This was considered one of the most important and essential factors in the success of conducting an aggressive war...propaganda was invariably a factor in preparing and conducting acts of aggression and in training the German populace to accept obediently the criminal enterprises of German fascism..."

Hans Fritzche, Director of the German Press Division The Nazi's Volksradio: Defective by Design The concept of Digital Rights Management, which is essentially creating devices which are "defective by design" or crippled to prevent "unauthorized analog signals" is not new. The Nazi Volksradio, or People's Radio, did exactly the same thing. This radio had isolated frequencies that could only tune to Nazi broadcasts. Listening to anything else meant the radio was likely modified, and punishable as treason. In German schools, children were taught to spy on their parents and questioned about their parents listening habits, often making them unwitting parties to their loved ones arrests. German townspeople led through a concentration camp, forced to view and bury the victims. They claimed not to know what was happening, and due to complete Nazi control of the radio, to some extent spoke the truth Hate Radio, Not Butt Bongo, Caused This Why does the FCC "protect" us from obscenity, which has never been known to instigate wars or violence, but not from ethnic scapegoating and racist propaganda, which has and does instigate wars and violence? In fact, US prosecutors have successfully tried those who appealed to hate radio as war criminals. The unchecked consequences of ethnic scapegoating/radio propaganda: ethnic war

“For the correct definition of the role of defendant Hans Fritzsche it is necessary, firstly, to keep clearly in mind the importance attached by Hitler...to propaganda in general and to radio propaganda in particular. This was considered one of the most important and essential factors in the success of conducting an aggressive war...propaganda was invariably a factor in preparing and conducting acts of aggression and in training the German populace to accept obediently the criminal enterprises of German fascism..."

In Nazi Germany, the production of radios that received signals other than German broadcasts was expressly forbidden; all radio equipment had to meet the approval of the state. Hitler hoped to prevent Germans from listening to British and French radio and was largely successful. So successful, in fact, many Germans thought they were still winning the war when Allied troops entered Germany, and most critically, most believed that there was no holocaust. To achieve this incredible social control and deception meant having complete control of the communications media. With radio, several frequencies were isolated and "Volksradios" could not tune into anything but Nazi stations. Listening to anything else meant the radio was likely modified. This was an act punishable as treason.

Today, the entertainment industry proposes pretty much the same thing. Analog signals are to be isolated and their receivers banned, to be replaced with digital signals. Under the broadcast flag pushed by the MPAA and RIAA, the FCC would criminalize the production of any electronic equipment capable of receiving anything outside HDTV broadcasts approved by the FCC. In other words, you would be forced to listen to what they want you to listen to, watch what they want you to watch, on devices you'll be forced to buy- since you'll have no choice in the matter. This would give the RIAA and MPAA control of the flow, reception and content of information at a level unseen since Nazi Germany.

Presently, the flow of information which Americans receive is dominated by the RIAA and MPAA, the head of the entertainment pyramid which represents Viacom, Time-Warner, Sony, BMI, Vivendi-Universal, Fox, etc. These corporations, in turn, own the news channels and even major internet news feeds like AOL, which Americans- unfortunately- rely on to make decisions affecting their lives.

All of which is to say, the MPAA and the RIAA are more powerful and dangerous than you think. The manipulation of the masses for commercial, political, and even military purposes is the very essence of broadcasting, and always has been. Informing an audience is incidental.

Should the broadcast flag become law, the act will make the FCC a state sponsored propaganda ministry disturbingly similar to Josef Goebbels’ Reich Ministry of National Enlightenment and Propaganda. More so.

The FCC and the Reich Ministry of Propaganda: Some Parallels

Of course, "obscene" was and is a label generously applied to silence or harass personalities or groups hostile to the ruling party or monopoly interests. "Obscene" is the label most often applied to political dissent. To the corrupt, hard truths will always be obscene, as they will always be objectionable.

The FCC's License to Kill: Looking at the True Obscenity

There are two types of propaganda employed by the media today: "white propaganda", which is based on facts but distorted to favor those disseminating it; and "black propaganda", which depends on lies and deceit. Both, however, are still lies and equally nefarious.

An excellent example of black propaganda lies in the commercial media's consistent ridicule or dismissal of those who would question the Warren Commission's lone nut theory in the JFK assassination; or that Flight 800 was caused by mechanical failure; or the downplayed Harvard studies linking fluoride and bone cancer in children. (The latter study points out the obvious in that fluoride is only safe and effective when applied topically on teeth but useless when ingested, making it pointless to add it in drinking water.)

To illustrate how dangerous it is to abuse the airwaves by appealing to hate and fear, on September 25, 1996, a "Real Radio" station in Florida broadcast a $1,000 bounty for a convicted killer, Donald McDougall during a call-in talk show. Soon after the show McDougall was beaten to death in prison with a piece of steel bar. Polk County police are now investigating if the broadcast was a contributing factor; since it is established that the murderer, Arba Earl Barr, listened to the said broadcast (Los Angeles Times, October 3, 1996 pg. A16).

Because the man who was killed was the convicted murderer of a young girl, few will notice the critical implications that this incident presents to every one of us. What happens, for instance, when the airwaves are used to bash an innocent target-- be it a political figure or ethnic scapegoat?

Where was the FCC? Handing out a license to kill. A broadcast license.

Where were they when Pat Robertson called for the assassination of a foreign leader on national television? they were fining radio personalities for butt bongo gags.

The FCC has no problem with pardoning slander and hate speech on the radio under the grounds of free speech, but when it comes to naughty language describing defecation or intercourse, or a 1/2 second flash of a woman's breast, they come with both guns firing. At the same, Ann Coulter can go on television and call Native Americans a "bunch of peyote smoking savages" when discussing their genocide and forced internment in reservations. That's not hate-speech, that's free speech.

She crossed one thunderous thigh, trapping the other beneath it.  Squinting through her glasses, it never occurred to her to feel guilty about sending a picture of her youngest sister, the great white hope of their family, to this man... She was convinced she could captivate him with her mind, and once that was accomplished, the flaws in her body would not matter.

A syndicated journalist's first encounter in an AOL chat room leads to an unexpected and sobering trip to Humilityville

A Short Story...

True or False

by Evil Wombat

The day Ralph Dieters purchased his computer his intentions were pure.  He did not expect to become a big, fat liar.  Honesty was important to him, as a writer.  He felt fiction could only rise to greatness if it were written with truth.  This made little sense, at least to anyone aside from him, but he would state it with great fervor every chance afforded him.

“The computer will be ready later today,” he told his neighbor, a woman of Irish descent, who was easily in her mid-eighties.  Every day he would speak to her, Mrs. O’Fannen, because he felt this was what a neighbor should do. 

When he finally lugged the two thousand-dollar monstrosity home, up the stairs, into his attic office, he was concerned he wouldn’t be able to put it together.

After several phone calls to the entity known as Tech Help, he reached the final stage.  It was time to push The Button.

The machine pushed on him by the horse-like salesperson at Best Buy featured One Touch Internet Access.  Ralph gazed cautiously at The Button that provided this mystical feature; much the way his ancestors nervously approached the snapping, angry-sounding, bright flames of fire thousands of years earlier.

He did not wonder what that button would do to his life. Just what it would do to his afternoon.  After all, he was a busy man.

• Continued

"My big ass feet have nothing to do with genetics or my parents, or any of that liberal hobgoblinism. It's the 9-11 widows who cursed me with this affliction. It's a scientific fact."

Celebrity Psycho Therapy: Ann Coulter

My name is Dr. I.M. Sessy (Ingrid May Sessy), and I am a psychologist.

My patients call me Dr. Milfe from the Sopranos, and I don't know why. Anyway, I have been commissioned to analyze the following celebrities with only their public behavior and writings to guide me through the twisted wreckage of their minds. Though some of the psychological terminology may seem obscure to the layman, this is written with the latter in mind. Some of the conditions the professional may recognize in the the DSM-IV- TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) but a few new categories, terms and conditions have been added.

This is a new feature. If you have a celebrity or public figure you'd like to submit to my special brand of remote psychiatric and psychological analysis, please write to the editor. He will leave a note with my secretary and I will write one up if and when the celebrity or public figure may gain valuable insight from my expertise.

Among the celebrities slated to be profiled are Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, Cristina Aguilera, Bill O'Reilly, Madonna, et al.

Ann "White Power!" Coulter

• Clinical Diagnosis: Delusional, Terminal Podophobia
• Freudian Diagnosis: Penis Envy

This reminds me of the joke about the man who told his doctor that his wife thinks she is a chicken. "Why didn't you tell me sooner?" the doctor asked. And the farmer says "We needed the eggs."

Ann Coulter suffers the delusion that she is a writer. But her owners at the Leo Strauss Obedience School won't tell her the truth, they need the eggs, and she lays them a plenty. Shit attracts flies as much as honey, and her little brown eggs, fresh from the bowels of this inane demon incarnate, should not be taken lightly....

A recent session with Coulter proved quite edifying. She took a seat in my office and removed her hood, the smell of sweaty feet and lighter fluid wafting in the air, her white robe practically a fire hazard.

"Hello Ann. How are you today?"

"White power!" she thundered with a Nazi salute.

"Eh, ok. Listen...Last week we spoke about your insecurity regarding the size of your feet. I'd like to touch upon that again."

"Why? you know it's hard for me to talk about that."

"I think it is important. Why do you blame someone new each week as to the cause of your 'big ass Flintstone feet'? Doesn't genetics explain it?"

"My big ass feet have nothing to to with genetics or my parents, or any of that liberal hobgoblinism. It's the 9-11 widows who cursed me with this affliction. It's a scientific fact."

"Do you realize how silly that sounds? Honestly, it's not my place to judge a patient, but to be objective and supportive. But damn, woman, the seriousness of your tone as you uttered that nonsense leaves me no choice...."

Actually made from Ann Coulter's shoe.

Immediately I left my chair and approached Ann, slapped the shit out of her, and calmly got back to my desk.

"Fucking liberal!" she cried.

"I'm not a liberal, dear. I'm a moderate. A centrist. We do exist you know, but we digress."

"You hit me!"

"You broke my nail, Sasquatch."

"Cunt."

There was a moment of uncomfortable silence, a silence all the more unnerving because Ann could never shut up. She talked in her sleep, she talked while awake. She talked while she chewed, she talked to herself. Her mouth was always running.

Finally I said "Tell me, Ann, can you remember the first time you ever felt insecure, or belittled by the size of your feet?"

She thought for a moment, a troubled past reflecting on her face....

"I think I was five years old. My dad loaned me out to the fire department to stomp out forest fires. They tried to hide it, but the firefighters always laughed behind my back."

She took off her shoes, the burns on her feet a testament to the veracity of the abuse.

"Then," Ann continued, "when I bought my first pair of Vans, the DMV made me put license plates on them. Fucking liberals."

"But Ann, don't you see the pattern here? As long as you have a personal issue, an insecurity about your own self-worth, you will attack and blame people around you. Indeed, you will still feel bad about yourself, perhaps worse if you have a conscience."

"Why are you always taking their side? The 9-11 widows made fun of my feet. Ergo, they caused my feet to grow to this enormous size."

"Are you sure they were snickering when you did your pedicure? Lots of women," I said, catching myself in a white lie, "do it with a bucket of polish and a paint roller."

"I am certain."

"Ann. Since large feet is something you can do nothing about, being born with it, you might expect a little sympathy for those born with something they can do nothing about; like their skin tone, their ethnicity, etc. Aren't you in the same boat?"

"That's different."

"How so?"

"Because."

"Because why?"

"White power!"

In 2003, the Dallas FBI also broke up a terror plot by members of the Ku Klux Klan to blow up a Wise County power plant.

Former Dallas FBI Special Agent in Charge Danny Coulson was involved in the nation’s first stand-offs with domestic anti-government groups and mounted some of the first intensive domestic terror investigations. He cautioned that authorities should take care not to forget about domestic groups while concentrating on foreign ones."

It was a caution that has fallen on deaf ears.

Al-Qaida's 2003 Cyanide Gas Plot: Terrorism

"News of the 2003 plot to use homemade cyanide bombs, the details of which have been confirmed by the New York Daily News, was first revealed Friday in excerpts from Suskind's book 'The One Percent Doctrine.' The plot, purportedly masterminded by al-Qaida's ringleader in Saudi Arabia, Yusuf al-Ayeri, involved planting crude but effective cyanide canisters around the subway system before the start of the Iraq war."

The Kloran.

The Ku Klux Klan, influenced by the Scottish Rite, call their handbook the Kloran, an obvious reference to  the Islamic Koran. The Klan burns the cross, despite its so-called Christianity, and also appeals to terror; another parallel to the anti-Christian Islamic fanatic.

• Neo-Nazi Leader Seeks Arab Support 01-26-04

• Islam's Unholy Alliance with Neo-Nazis, Leftists - 12-29-03

• "Secrets of Timoty McVeigh" Jim Crogaan LA Weekly News.

Like their Jew-Hating Western Kin, Hamas Dons the White Robe and Hood

Palestinian Hamas suicide bombers, prepare for the catwalk.

Are these terrorists taking a fashion cue from their terrorist kin in the west?

Below, Klansmen leaving rally at a courthouse in Jasper, Texas. It was held at the trial of John King, a Klansmen convicted in the dragging death of James Byrd. Here, residents show their approval

US soldiers in Iraq  stand beside mural of Saddam celebrating 9-11. (click to enlarge)

The Oklahoma City Klan Leader who Rallied for Saddam

"[Dennis Mahon] boasts of his connections to Saddam Hussein’s intelligence service and admits to having been in its pay, beginning during the Persian Gulf War, when he organized several rallies for Iraq. During an interview with a Brazilian television crew, Mahon unrolled and proudly held up a poster of Yasir Arafat, reportedly one of his heroes."

The New American- OKC's Middle East Connection on former Oklahoma City Klan leader Dennis Mahon, partially clad in militia gear.

The Middle-East Connection to Timothy McVeigh"

The [motel] owner says McVeigh was with several Iraqis. He and several of his employees picked out their faces from a photo spread provided by Davis and KFOR-TV... One of the Iraqis, Hussain Alhussaini, later came forward and identified himself as the person being fingered in Davis’ reports as [the FBI's] John Doe No. 2."

"Secrets of Timoty McVeigh" Jim Crogan LA Weekly News.

US Electrical Grid a Target for Both Al-Qaida and the Klan

the northeastern blackout of 2003

Months before the Klan's cyanide gas plot was unraveled, the Dallas FBI also broke up a terror plot by members of the Ku Klux Klan to blow up a Wise County power plant. Although Al-Qaida claimed responsibility for the blackout that knocked out the northeastern United States for several hours, and although it was later attributed to a "technical failure", we do know the electrical grids were targeted throughout the US. And we do know that the Klan was among the groups doing it. We also know that during any crisis on the magnitude of the Northeastern Blackout of 2003, authorities will dream up cover stories to keep Americans from "panic".

This leaves us to ask a simple question: when and if another major terrorist attack hit America, will the Klan once again escape scrutiny by media and political assets too blinded by xenophobia and hate to protect fellow Americans from an obvious fifth column in robes and hood?

After reports of the Klan's terrorist activities surfaced in 2003, Klan leaders decided to use the "immigrant invasion" as a diversion, and were in fact, were instrumental in forming the first militia units to man the southern border. Elements of the far right sympathetic to the Klan, having always given them air time and publicity, soon warned Americans about the possibility of terrorists coming in from the south, but at the same time, had become ideologically allied to, and unwittingly working with, domestic terrorists in the US: The Invisible Empire, the Ku Klux Klan.

"This is one of the most requested programs in FRONTLINE's history. It is about an Iowa schoolteacher who, the day after Martin Luther King Jr. was murdered in 1968, gave her third-grade students a first-hand experience in the meaning of discrimination. This is the story of what she taught the children, and the impact that lesson had on their lives."

NARRATOR: Tonight, a third grade class gets a traumatic lesson in discrimination...

JANE ELLIOTT: Blue-eyed people are smarter than brown-eyed people. They are cleaner than brown-eyed people. They are more civilized than brown-eyed people.

JOHN: Russell called me names and I hit him...

JANE ELLIOTT: What did he call you?

JOHN: Brown eyes.

NARRATOR: Tonight on FRONTLINE...the story of one teacher...her lesson...and what happened to A CLASS DIVIDED."

The sobering lessons in this classic documentary can never be forgotten.  Do yourself a favor and....

• View the documentary.

Film Review- The DaVinci Code

"All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals of this novel are accurate."

One of the most questionable "facts" Dan Brown lists in the opening page of The DaVinci Code.

Hi, I'm museum curator Jacques Sauniere. I've just been gut shot by a mad albino monk, and getting gut shot is one of the most painful ways a man can die. For a shooting, it's also one of the slowest ways to die. I'm in a popular museum, the Louvre. There's phones everywhere, just in case the cell phone in my pocket is dead. If I die right now, I take with me one of the great secrets of the Templars, which supposedly, could undermine the entire Christian faith. That means my life is precious.

So do I use my cell or pick up a phone and call for an ambulance, if even just for pain killers? No, that would imply sanity, and this is a Dan Brown novel.

Symbology Department at Harvard Doesn't Even Exist! Since there is no such thing as a Symbology Department at Harvard University, the publisher of the DaVinci Code has gone to the trouble creating a bogus web site to imply both the book's fictional protagonist, Robert Langdon, and the Harvard symbology department are real. Why?

I know. I'll do what any rational, intelligent person would do. I will tear off my clothes, pose myself naked like a DaVinci piece, and then draw a pentagram on my chest. Then I will lay on the ground until I die, confident that symbologist Robert Langdon, whom I have never met, will try to decrypt the symbolism of my death, so my death would not have been in vain. My genius, however, has only begun. Being a man of erudition, I know there is no such thing as a symbology department at Harvard University. So, the mere act of appealing to Langdon is appealing to an outright fraud, or madman. No matter, this important wisdom I carry is too precious to leave to a real university department and a real professor. I shall instead, trust them to a man who makes up his own departments at Harvard university...you know like the Harvard Department of Symbology, or for that matter, its sister units: the Department of Goblinology, the Department of Jedi Knightology or the Department of Pubicology.

Wait. I really didn't have to die, right? Maybe it would have been easier, and far more certain, that I could convey my important secret if I called for an ambulance, and as I lay in the hospital, called for Langdon and told him myself or simply passed him a note. Surely, if I could go to the trouble of painting a pentagram on my chest, and posing myself awkwardly on the ground as I was gut shot and dying, I'd have enough strength and lucidity to write a simple note to Langdon, or if you want to be even more thorough, an encrypted note to pass on "an unbroken chain of knowledge".

What you have just read is the actual prologue of The DaVinci Code and is in the movie as well. This is an example of Dan Brown's "careful attention to detail" and knack for writing "gripping, convincing prose".

So much for a suspension of disbelief, which is the heart of any good story. In an action movie, like the latest X-men movie, this element is not only there it allows for the most fantastic plot twists. However, in The DaVinci Code, this suspension of disbelief is not welcome anywhere near Brown's general vicinity, and even if it was, would be avoided like a leper at a kissing booth. To say your intellect is danced upon and pissed on like a urinal cake is tempting, but unfair. Clearly, it is assumed the reader or movie viewer has none.

Again, Robert Langdon is a the head of the Symbology Department at Harvard University, and Harvard University has no symbology department. Aware of this discrepancy, the book publishers went to the trouble of creating a web page for Robert Langdon to create the illusion both are real. Isn't that neat?

I mean, the very protagonist of the story heads a fictional department of a fictional science- symbology. It doesn't even qualify as pseudoscience. This wouldn't bother me so much if the opening page didn't imply- nay, insist that the novel was a scholarly exposition of a real secret based on actual events and personages.

Nor does it make much sense to me if the professor of a fake department can attack any religion, when his own credentials imply insanity or fraud. In a downloadable church booklet challenging the assertions of "Cracking the DaVinci Code", the "factual" assertions of a fake professor from a fake science and fake department are itemized:

• Jesus is not God; he was only a man.
• Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene.
• She is to be worshiped as a goddess. [If Jesus is not God, then why should Mary Magdalene be worshipped if a servant is not above the master?]
• Jesus got her pregnant, and the two had a daughter.
• That daughter gave rise to a prominent family line that is still present in Europe today.
• The Bible was put together by a pagan Roman emperor.
• Jesus was viewed as a man and not as God until the fourth century, when he was deified by the emperor Constantine.
• The Gospels have been edited to support the claims of later Christians.
• In the original Gospels, Mary Magdalene rather than Peter was directed to establish the Church.
• There is a secret society known as the Priory of Sion that still worships Mary Magdalene as a goddess and is trying to keep the truth alive.
• The Catholic Church is aware of all this and has been fighting for centuries to keep it suppressed. It often has committed murder to do so.
• The Catholic Church is willing to and often has assassinated the descendents of Christ to keep his bloodline from growing.

"Catholics should be concerned about the book because it not only misrepresents their Church as a murderous institution but also implies that the Christian faith itself is utterly false.... Only some of the offensive claims of The Da Vinci Code pertain directly to the Catholic Church.

The article goes on to say:

"The remainder strike at the Christian faith itself. If the book's claims were true, then all forms of Christianity would be false (except perhaps for Gnostic/feminist versions focusing on Mary Magdalene instead of Jesus)."

Hey Langdon, what does this symbol mean?

That said, we get back to the suspension of disbelief. In an action movie, this is important, in a drama/thriller, it is critical. It is especially critical when a fictional movie attempts to challenge the foundation of over 2,000 years of Christianity: archeology, religious and secular history, etc.

The viewer has to believe that the claims of Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) could possibly have basis in reality. In the opening scenes, we see a droning Landon delivering a lecture on symbology. Projected on a large screen before a university audience is a slide show, showing photos of symbols in different settings and angles. For example the swastika in Buddhism and the Nazi Party, and the similarity between the Klan robe and hood to those worn by certain priests in Europe. The message here is that the same or similar symbols means different things to different cultures. Well, duh. White is the color of mourning in China, and in the west, black is the color of mourning. So what?

This is the basis of Langdon's "genius", and his "science" which will propel the movie's alleged plot. Since this is a film about religion, one would expect an expert in archeology, theology, ancient languages, history, in short, a man who embodies all of these real sciences. But no, we get a man- Langdon- that can tell us the symbolism of the extended middle finger I'm showing him may mean different things in different places and times. Symbols are relative to time and place, we get it. That's why I don't flip off a blind person, it's rude and beside, it's pointless relative to the circumstances.

Now, I love movies. And I can forgive a few monologues by gunmen which inevitably, allow the hero to escape, if not turn the tables and capture the gunman. These attention-whore-soliloquizing-gunmen are the most common props in the stage kit of the lazy or unoriginal writer. In The DaVinci Code, just about everyone has a gun but Langdon, and everyone with a gun has a prepared speech. You almost expect the gunman to reach into his coat pocket, grab his speech and read aloud like it was Oscar night.

One of the most absurd attention-whore-soliloquizing-gunman scenes includes Teabig, an elderly cripple (Ian McKellan). He needs two canes to stand, and can barely walk. Yet, he can easily subdue Langdon and Sophie, since it occurs to neither of these cardboard cut-outs that maybe, just maybe, they could out run the yammering old gimp as he drones on and on about The Dark Side. It is obvious to anyone but these two imbeciles that Teabag cannot walk and aim a gun at once, and that the only time he can aim a gun is when he is precariously braced up by one of his two canes.

I could go on and on about Dan Brown's literary masturbation to Leonardo DaVinci , but I won't. Those who read the book and liked it will probably like the movie too. But if you haven't read the book, you will probably hate the film, like the people I saw shaking their heads in disgust and booing as I left the theater.

RELATED:

• Cracking the DaVinci Code

How CNN Tried to Legitimize the Klan CNN President Jonathan Klein   Since reality doesn't bring him the spurious figures he needs to sow racial enmity, Lou Dobbs and CNN now rely on stats and guests from known Klan fronts and organizations, such as the Council of Conservative Citizens, which even Sen. Trent Lott tried to distance himself from.  Here, in his element, Dobbs delivers a keynote address on immigration and white power. CNN Cites White Supremacist Group as Source SPLC Report on Lou Dobbs. Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks the Klan and neo-Nazis, reports on Lou Dobs CNN Source Circulates this Flyer A Council of Conservative Citizens Flyer on President Lincoln. Admitted white supremacists and segregationists: this is the type of group CNN now appeals to as a credible source of unbiased, scientific studies. Much like international terrorists, who form front groups and "religious charities" to fund their movement, Klan fronts are created to maintain an illusion of grassroots sentiment, but are easily discerned by a consistently parallel agenda with official Ku Klux Klan platforms and ideology. For example, both the Minutemen and Klan see the government as an enemy; both groups support vigilante justice over federal control of immigration laws.  Indeed, the Klan and Minutemen are now interwoven militia movements, the latter with a few token minorities but led exclusively by white supremacists on a crusade to preserve America's "racial purity". In other words, the Minutemen are the armed militia movement of the Klan. The entire point of these fronts is to bring legitimacy to the hated Klan, to make Americans forget their history of domestic terrorism from lynchings to church bombings. See the Anti-Defamation League report on the CCC.

How to Effectively Boycott a Radio or Television Show

"Klan fronts are created to maintain an illusion of grassroots sentiment, but are easily discerned by a consistently parallel agenda with official Ku Klux Klan platforms and ideology. For example, both the Minutemen and Klan see the government as an enemy; and both groups support vigilantism over federal control of immigration laws.  Indeed, the Klan and Minutemen are now interwoven militia movements, the latter with a few token gays and minorities but led exclusively by white supremacists on a crusade to preserve America's 'racial purity'. In other words, the Minutemen are the armed militia movement, and recruitment pool, of the Klan."

You have a purchasing power approaching 1.08 trillion in 4 years, and its up 413 percent from 1990, according to a report by the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the University of Georgia. Yet you are the scapegoat of political media assets hoping to divert attention from the price of gasoline, unchecked Congressional corruption, an increasingly unpopular and costly war, etc.

You are misled by wealthy television and radio personalities with stock portfolios in oil and energy, who grow richer every time the oil companies fuck Americans over. So, attacking what really bothers and affects most Americans isn't in the interest of these media personalities. If they attack oil they risk exposing malfeasance, and exposing malfeasance means a drop in their stock value (like we saw at Enron). Thus they need a scapegoat for Americans to vent their gas-pump rage upon, and immigrants, blacks, gays, religious minorities etc. are a perennial favorite, and always convenient.

What can you, the scapegoat and consumer, do in the face of these attacks? Well, here are the self-evident facts, and here's what you can do...

First of all, understand, and never forget, the following:

Oil. The entire American economy depends on it. Oil makes plastics, plastics you see in everything from water bottles to computer parts. Oil prices affect the price of all goods which have plastic.

Oil powers many of the generators in our electrical grids. Oil affects the price of your electric bill.

Oil is the diesel in the trucks and trains that bring goods to your Wal-Mart, it is the airline fuel that transports people and international goods. It therefore affects the price of air and land delivery.

Because airline fuel affects ticket prices, it is the difference between tourism and no tourism.

The last time we had an oil crisis, in the 1970s, the result was severe inflation. It may have cost President Jimmy Carter his re-election more than any other factor.

Mark Twain on Immigration and Politics- 1872

Chapter Excerpt from "Roughing It"

"They are a kindly disposed, well-meaning race, and are respected and well treated by the upper classes, all over the Pacific coast. No Californian gentleman or lady ever abuses or oppresses a Chinaman, under any circumstances, an explanation that seems to be much needed in the East. Only the scum of the population do it--they and their children; they, and, naturally and consistently, the policemen and politicians, likewise, for these are the dust-licking pimps and slaves of the scum, there as well as elsewhere in America."

Mark Twain, aka Samuel Clemens, in 'Roughing It" 1872

CHAPTER LIV.

Of course there was a large Chinese population in Virginia--it is the case with every town and city on the Pacific coast. They are a harmless race when white men either let them alone or treat them no worse than dogs; in fact they are almost entirely harmless anyhow, for they seldom think of resenting the vilest insults or the cruelest injuries. They are quiet, peaceable, tractable, free from drunkenness, and they are as industrious as the day is long. A disorderly Chinaman is rare, and a lazy one does not exist. So long as a Chinaman has strength to use his hands he needs no support from anybody; white men often complain of want of work, but a Chinaman offers no such complaint; he always manages to find something to do. He is a great convenience to everybody--even to the worst class of white men, for he bears the most of their sins, suffering fines for their petty thefts, imprisonment for their robberies, and death for their murders. Any white man can swear a Chinaman's life away in the courts, but no Chinaman can testify against a white man. Ours is the "land of the free"--nobody denies that--nobody challenges it. [Maybe it is because we won't let other people testify.] As I write, news comes that in broad daylight in San Francisco, some boys have stoned an inoffensive Chinaman to death, and that although a large crowd witnessed the shameful deed, no one interfered.

There are seventy thousand (and possibly one hundred thousand) Chinamen on the Pacific coast. There were about a thousand in Virginia. They were penned into a "Chinese quarter"--a thing which they do not particularly object to, as they are fond of herding together. Their buildings were of wood; usually only one story high, and set thickly together along streets scarcely wide enough for a wagon to pass through. Their quarter was a little removed from the rest of the town. The chief employment of Chinamen in towns is to wash clothing. They always send a bill, like this below, pinned to the clothes. It is mere ceremony, for it does not enlighten the customer much. Their price for washing was $2.50 per dozen--rather cheaper than white people could afford to wash for at that time. A very common sign on the Chinese houses was: "See Yup, Washer and Ironer"; "Hong Wo, Washer"; "Sam Sing & Ah Hop, Washing." The house servants, cooks, etc., in California and Nevada, were chiefly Chinamen. There were few white servants and no Chinawomen so employed. Chinamen make good house servants, being quick, obedient, patient, quick to learn and tirelessly industrious. They do not need to be taught a thing twice, as a general thing. They are imitative. If a Chinaman were to see his master break up a centre table, in a passion, and kindle a fire with it, that Chinaman would be likely to resort to the furniture for fuel forever afterward.

• continued

Exclusive Ann Coulter Book Preview

Ann Coulter's new book, "Skinhead: My Life as a Man", is due out in June and is already raising controversy with its surprising revelations

"My penis was throbbing through pink lacy panties, its massive girth slipping through and embarrassing me in church...."

 

Chapter One

White Power!

Liberals. Blah blah dee blah blah blahblah dee blah blah blah. Blah blah dee blah blah blahblah dee blah blah blah.

All liberals are evil, especially those who can read. Are you a liberal? Fuck you. Blah blah dee blah blah blah liberals. Liberals. Blah blah dee blah blah blah liberals, you stupid race traitors.

My daddy was an Anglophile in the Klan, and he taught me that burning the cross honors Jesus, just like burning  the American flag honors the United States.

White power! everyone knows 2 +2 = 5. What are you, a race traitor? liberal? Blah blah dee blah blah blahblah dee blah blah blah. Blah blah dee blah blah blahblah dee blah blah blah.

My big ass, sexy white feet are proof of genetic supremacy, of reptilian DNA. White power!

"Blacks loved slavery. Blah dee blah blah blah, fucking liberals. Beaners." I said, when I was still a man. "They're almost as bad as Flips, Japs and Chinks."

"Blah blah dee blah blah blahblah dee blah blah blah. Blah blah dee blah blah blah blah dee blah blah blah."

My penis was throbbing through pink lacy panties, its massive girth slipping through and embarrassing me in church. And I hated it, blah dee blah blah. I had to have an operation, and become the world's most famous transsexual conservative author.

 

Hate is Not Pretty Ann Coulter C-SPAN video excerpts of an actual speech in which she refers to Native Americans as peyote smoking "savages" and refers to Arabs as "camel-riding nomads." She also suggests that dissidents should be put in "administrative detention under John Ashcroft." Hate is Not Pretty

The internet phenom we know and love as Maddox, author of The Best Page in the Universe, has pulled off quite a feat. Not only has he proved a website can be profitable without ad revenue, he has proven it can bring him a #1 best-seller, The Alphabet of Manliness, months before his book is officially released June 6 of 2006. Moreover, his satirical page has pulled it off despite being censored in several countries and in America by web filters like Websense.

By all accounts and early reviews, this book is indeed manly. In fact, Maddox's new book "is dedicated to the memory of the effeminate man, who will face the onset of extinction on June 6, 2006. "

Some Maddox Classics for your perusal...

• Racism and scat, a powerful union (new hate mail).

• How to kill yourself like a man.

• Oops! You're racist.

• Looking for a safe stance on abortion? Me neither.

• Twenty-six things a perfect guy would do, and other propaganda disseminated by misguided women.

• Love your kids? Prove it by beating them.

• I am better than your kids.

• Next