Fake Polls Meant to Hide Hillary’s Vote Rigging in California Primary: “Operation Pliers” in Plain View

By |May 25th, 2016|

"Operation Pliers" Comes to America

If this notorious voter suppression PSYOP didn't exist then, it exists now, and it is self-evident. This time, it is waged against Americans, not Venezuelans. Here's the proof the mainstream media see Americans as an enemy.


Chris Matthews actually boasts of network plans to engage in a PSYOPS used in Venezuela, but this time to suppress voter turn-out in California. The 2007 Operation Pliers Memo read: "Start to release data during the early hours of the afternoon [declaring a false win]... (in clear violation of election regulations) [the networks are already doing this by saying Hillary Clinton already won!]

"Operation Pliers" Comes to America: First the fake polls. You will see psychological operations (PSYOPS), "that include contracting polling companies to create fraudulent polls" that show Hillary has already won. This is to create an acceptance of the fraudulent results. They will plant them  in news sources everywhere, and then news assets will begin to cite these news agencies where the polls where published. As Chris Matthews proudly admits, they will call the election for Hillary before all the votes are in by several hours; this to suppress turnout. Voters will miss the last hours left to vote because they will believe, falsely, that the election was won. This tactic, as you can see, was exactly the same as Operation Pliers outlined below, which the CIA was alleged to have used against Hugo Chavez in a bid for regime change.

Sen. Barbara Boxer "fearing for her life" at an alleged chair throwing incident in Nevada. That "fuck you" goes out to the largest voting group in America: you.

Now, it doesn't matter if the CIA used it or not. They said they didn't do it, and for the sake of argument let's say they didn't. That makes it worse for Matthews and the networks, because Chris proudly owns up to doing it before, and admits other networks plan to do it too. He is confessing to a distasteful tactic even the CIA would publicly distance itself from. Matthews is gloating about a PSYOPS used against the American people, not hapless Venezuelans, which supports a point made in earlier writings: the corporate media literally see the American people as an enemy to be misled, corralled, and controlled lest they find what has been done to them as publishers and broadcasters became the elites. The networks are also predicting violence, which is actually a key component of Operation Pliers, to plant the suggestion and then have fake supporters instigate chaos. This is what happened in Nevada.  

Conjuring the Dead for State Affairs Casts Doubts on Hillary’s Psychological Stability

By |May 26th, 2016|

download (6)If Eleanor did speak, she did well in getting the former president to mention the fact that she communes with the dead on a regular basis, because it confirms what many already know: Miss Cleo is a terrible foreign policy adviser. In Macbeth, a classic tragedy, Shakespeare addresses this and the question of free will. Macbeth, a Scottish lord meets three witches after winning a battle. They call him "Thane of Cawdor" and "future King of Scotland" before this even happens. But King Duncan, though rewarding him with the title of the recently executed Thane of Cawdor, announces that his son will be heir to the throne.  Macbeth believes that he has to kill the king now to fulfill the prophecy of the witches. Once Macbeth becomes king, however, he becomes so paranoid about losing power that he starts killing everyone around him, Kissinger style. Eventually his friends turn on him, and then even his army.

download (1)Macbeth follows the advice of the three witches after seeing them again and they conjure the dead to guide him (with tragic results). There is a paradox in this play where the witches know about Macbeth being the future king, but we do not know if he would have even thought about being king if he had not met them.

Interestingly, there is a modern parallel in this very presidential election in terms of the conjuring of "Eleanor" while Secretary of State, even to the point she plays messenger for a dead woman, the late Eleanor Roosevelt in a former president's public address...

“Because as all of you famously learned when I served as president, my wife, now the Secretary of State, was known to commune with Eleanor on a regular basis…she told me that Eleanor reminded her to tell me that I should say that…”

Bill Clinton (see video clip above) See source from Trey Smith
Now in Peru, Hillary, did Eleanor say you would be president? Or was it some other time?

Not a Joke: Facebook Wants Your Passport, Driver’s License, Birth Certificate.

By |May 24th, 2016|

What Types of ID Does Facebook Accept? If we look at how easy it is now to match a person to a personality profile, and how other countries have used this information to quell dissent and even arrest citizens, this should be cause for concern. The dead and missing in Syria, Egypt, China, Turkey, are excellent examples of what happens when an autocratic state uses Facebook data against them. When they ask for your mobile number, they automatically get all of your contacts.  As we've seen already, this is recipe for disaster. More coming soon...

Should Dems Be Freaking Out? In First, National Polling Average Shows Trump Over Clinton

By |May 23rd, 2016|

Perhaps even more troubling, the NBC/WSJ survey found that the negative ratings for the two presumptive nominees are the highest in the history of the poll. Fifty-four percent of those surveyed hold a negative opinion of Clinton and 58 percent have a negative opinion of Trump. At the same time, Democratic challenger Bernie Sanders continues to best both Clinton and Trump in favorability ratings (43 percent hold a positive view of the Vermont senator versus 36 percent who have a negative view) and maintains a double-digit lead over the Republican candidate. NBC/WSJ recorded Sanders ahead of Trump by 15 points. For the period between May 13-19, the presumptive Republican nominee polled ahead of Clinton by a national average of 0.2 points. (Image: Real Clear Politics) (Image: Real Clear Politics)  

8 Years Ago Hillary Evoked RFK Assassination to Stay in Race

By |May 23rd, 2016|

"When asked last week by South Dakota's Sioux Falls Argus Leader newspaper about all this "Hillary Should Quit" nonsense, you said: "My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. You know I just, I don't understand it." "Jeez, Hillary, are you out of your fucking mind? Even if you didn't mean it, to suggest that as a justification to stay in the race, Obama could be assassinated before the primary season is over, is perhaps the most shocking, shameful, morally reprehensible thing you could have possibly ever said." "How could you? Do you realize that with that one comment you threw away whatever shot you may have had to fulfill your dream of convincing, brainwashing and/or bullying the super D's into handing you the nomination? How could you implode like that? It was a despicable act of desperation and, quite frankly, it was pathetic. With that one reckless opportunistic blunder you not only threw away the campaign, but your legacy as well. A once valiant warrior, you are now just a sad footnote in history. An embarrassment. I suspect you will never recover politically from your monumentally insensitive RFK comment, made in the very same week that Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy was diagnosed with a deadly brain tumor. "And so I can no longer support this destructive campaign of yours..."